Supreme Court denies Trump-backed Missouri congressional map for the third time
By
asserted
Court → deny → time
The Supreme Court on Friday turned away an attempt to use a new Missouri congressional map backed by President Donald Trump, putting an end to a long-running legal dispute as absentee voting is underway in the midterm elections.
asserted
voting → turn → elections
The justices halted a federal appeals court ruling that would have revived the Republican-friendly map for the November elections, which will determine control of Congress.
asserted
which → halt → Congress
The Supreme Court instead let stand a decision by the Missouri Supreme Court, which ruled earlier this month that a citizen petition prevents the new map from being used unless first approved by voters in a November referendum.
asserted
petition → let → referendum
The decision means Missouri residents will vote under the same congressional districts used in the 2024 and 2022 elections.
asserted
residents → mean → elections
“At this late date, ordering reversion to the 2025 map in the midst of an ongoing election would usher in electoral chaos,” the high court wrote in an unsigned opinion.
asserted
court → order → opinion
“The District Court and Court of Appeals should not enjoin or otherwise prohibit the use of the 2022 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri.”
asserted
Court → enjoin → Missouri
Republicans had hoped the new House map — which already was used in the August primaries — could help them win an additional seat as part of a nationwide redistricting battle pushed by Trump to gain an edge in the midterms.
uncertain
them → hop → midterms
A panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that switching districts between the primary and general elections would violate the U.S. Constitution.
asserted
switching → rule → Constitution
The panel directed a district judge to bar Missouri from using anything other than the new map but delayed the order’s effect until next Monday to allow time for an appeal to the Supreme Court.
asserted
panel → direct → Court
Republicans had hoped the new House map — which already was used in the August primaries — could help them win an additional seat as part of a nationwide redistricting battle pushed by Trump to gain an edge in the midterms.
uncertain
them → hop → midterms
A panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that switching districts between the primary and general elections would violate the U.S. Constitution.
asserted
switching → rule → Constitution
The panel directed a district judge to bar Missouri from using anything other than the new map but delayed the order’s effect until next Monday to allow time for an appeal to the Supreme Court.
asserted
panel → direct → Court
Republican state Sen. Rick Brattin won a six-way Republican primary under the revised districts.
asserted
Brattin → win → districts
They remain the candidates for the general election, even though the district boundaries have reverted to their prior lines.
asserted
boundaries → remain → lines
Brattin was a plaintiff, along with Republican Rep. Bob Onder and two other voters, in a federal lawsuit that led to the 8th Circuit’s ruling and the last two appeals to the Supreme Court.
asserted
that → lead → Court
Missouri’s redistricting prompted a big legal fight
asserted
redistricting → prompt → fight
At least 16 lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts related to Missouri’s congressional redistricting.
asserted
lawsuits → file → redistricting
The battle has been the longest and most complex among roughly a dozen states that sought to change their U.S. House districts over the past year.
asserted
that → seek → year
Missouri’s new map survived most of the lawsuits, including ones contending that mid-decade redistricting violated the state constitution and that the new districts ran afoul of requirements to be compact.
asserted
districts → survive → requirements
In one case, the Missouri Supreme Court allowed the new districts to be used while election officials worked to verify petition signatures seeking to put the map to a statewide vote.
asserted
officials → allow → vote
Republican Secretary of State Denny Hoskins waited until the legal deadline on Aug. 4 — the day the new districts were used in the primaries — to reject the petition.
asserted
districts → wait → petition
He asserted referendum petitions aren’t allowed for congressional redistricting.
asserted
petitions → assert → redistricting
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled Sept. 3 that the referendum petition was valid.
asserted
petition → rule → ?
It ordered Hoskins not to use the new map and to instead use the districts adopted in 2022, after the last census.
asserted
It → order → census
The U.S. Supreme Court let that ruling stand on Sept. 8.
asserted
ruling → let → Sept.
But minutes later, U.S. District Judge Stephen Clark issued a conflicting order in favor of the new map.
asserted
Clark → issue → map
The U.S. Supreme Court on Sept. 10 blocked Clark’s order from taking effect.
asserted
Court → block → effect
That day, the Missouri Supreme Court held Hoskins temporarily in contempt for telling local election authorities to use the new map after Clark’s order.
asserted
Hoskins → hold → order
Start your day with all you need to know
Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more.
asserted
Report → start → news
The 8th Circuit, hearing an appeal of Clark’s blocked order, ruled in favor of the Trump-backed map Monday.
asserted
Circuit → hear → map
That’s what led to the latest decision from the U.S. Supreme Court.
asserted
what → ’ → Court
Richard von Glahn, executive director of People Not Politicians Missouri, said the group was pressing forward with its campaign to persuade voters to permanently reject the new map in the November referendum.
asserted
group → say → referendum
“We have said from the beginning, people, not politicians will be the final deciders on this DC power grab,” he said in a statement.
asserted
he → say → statement
The Aporia
