No Anti-Stalking Order Against Rabbi Based on His Actions Opposing Anti-Israel Protest

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, August 28). No Anti-Stalking Order Against Rabbi Based on His Actions Opposing Anti-Israel Protest. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/27/no-anti-stalking-order-against-rabbi-based-on-his-actions-opposing-anti-israel-protest/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-08-28 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

A Washington D.C. rabbi's actions against protesters outside the Israeli embassy in 2024 were deemed not to warrant an anti-stalking order. The incidents occurred during protests against Israel's military actions in Gaza, with Rabbi Herzfeld calling a protester a "Hamas supporter" and "terrorist." A judge ultimately denied the request for a restraining order due to lack of evidence that Rabbi Herzfeld intended to harass or intimidate the protesters. Three separate incidents took place on three different days in March and May 2024, involving Rabbi Herzfeld and two protesters, Ms. Barmada and Ms. Rokhvand.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

A judge has ruled that a rabbi, Rabbi Herzfeld, did not violate an anti-stalking order by protesting against anti-Israel demonstrations outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. The protests were led by two women, Ms. Rokhvand and Ms. Barmada, who had been staging a months-long demonstration against Israel's military actions in Gaza. Rabbi Herzfeld, the rabbi of a local congregation, was involved in counter-protests and displayed signs criticizing the protesters' views. A judge ultimately decided that Rabbi Herzfeld's actions were protected by free speech laws, and he did not have to pay the plaintiffs' attorney fees as requested. The case occurred on three separate days in March and May 2024 during protests in front of the Israeli embassy.

Written for “Anti-Israel Protest Controversy” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Anti-Israel Protest Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 5 of 58
“The articles describe different incidents with different participants and locations, although they are related to protests against Israel”
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles mention different legal cases and events involving protests and court orders, with no clear connection between them.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
75
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
10 of 75 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
94/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 43 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
144 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Even in First Amendment cases, where the facial-challenge bar is lower than it otherwise might be, the plaintiff [in a facial challenge] must show that "a substantial number of [the law's] applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep."
🔮 Officers who violate the law may be criminally prosecuted by the State.
🔮 The standard for the granting of Pseudonym status can be found in Practice Book § 11–20A(h)(1) which provides in pertinent part: "Pseudonyms may be used in place of the name of a party or parties only with the prior approval of the judicial authority and only if the judicial authority concludes that such order is necessary to preserve an interest which is determined to override the public's interest in knowing the name of the party or parties.
🔮 It would hold up only if websites have an inherent expressive value that differs from the expressive value inherent in all books.
🔮 While any one of FirstBank's services to Epstein may be claimed to be "routine" (though in many instances even that is suspicious), together, the complaint alleges that FirstBank was deeply enmeshed in Epstein's misconduct for its own financial benefit….
🔮 We hold that some predicate crimes (like Bost's conviction for terroristic threats) demonstrate a prima facie risk of physical violence from misusing guns and that those convicted of such crimes may presumptively be disarmed based on those convictions alone….
🔮 However, when it came to Pride events, the newsroom was deviating from its typical editorial review process, and many reporters were beginning to go cover stories about Pride festivals as soon as they heard that the event was taking place—without discussing with the rest of the newsroom whether the story ought to be covered, whether it was duplicative of another story that had recently aired, or whether some unique aspect of the story could be explored in a way that highlighted the story's overall newsworthiness.
🔮 The Court will grant that motion as well, finding that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed not only on their due process claim, but also on their two First Amendment claims.
🔮 But if you submit exclusively to us before that, we will give you an answer within 14 days; and then if you'd like to have it published quickly, we can publish it in within a few months, if it's sufficiently clean and cite-checked by your research assistant.
🔮 Two NAMI supporters, whom we will call "June" and "Lynn," names we have randomly chosen in the interest of their privacy, were employees of a large health-insurance company and arrived early to set up a picnic area and booth to greet their participating coworkers and provide information about their employer.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-10-16 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 144 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

D.C. Gaza Israel Israeli Jewish

Subjects

Barmada PERSON · 14× Herzfeld PERSON · 13× Rokhvand PERSON · 6× Israel GPE · 5× Rabbi Herzfeld PERSON · 5× Hamas ORG · 4× Gaza GPE · 3× D.C. GPE · 2× Israeli NORP · 2× Jewish NORP · 2×

Narrative

That statute provides for prompt dismissal of meritless cases brought based on speech on public matters, and provides that a losing plaintiff in such a case has to pay the defendant's attorney fees; but how that plays out as to the attorney fee request here is left for the trial court (for reasons you can read about in the opinion).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-28
🔮 This case arises from three incidents that occurred on three separate days in March and May of 2024 during demonstrations in front of the Israeli embassy….

Claims (75 extracted, 10 hedged)

This case arises from three incidents that occurred on three separate days in March and May of 2024 during demonstrations in front of the Israeli embassy…. uncertain
that → arise → embassy
Ms. Rokhvand and Ms. Barmada were engaged in a multi-month demonstration in front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C. in protest of Israel's recent military actions in Gaza…. asserted
Rokhvand → engage → Gaza
The protesters used a designated area outside the embassy to set up their display of flags, tents, and signs and to engage in "noise demonstrations," during which they spoke into megaphones, played Palestinian music, or used noise machines. asserted
they → use → machines
They displayed large signs with messages against Israel's military actions in Gaza, as well as a sign offering earplugs to passersby, along the sidewalk. asserted
They → display → sidewalk
During his tenure in D.C., Rabbi Herzfeld has been involved in the wider community and worked with other local faith leaders and elected officials. asserted
Herzfeld → involve → leaders
Rabbi Herzfeld has close relationships with family and friends in Israel and was "devastat[ed]" by the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. asserted
Herzfeld → have → Israel
Rabbi Herzfeld did not know of Ms. Barmada or Ms. Rokhvand before his interactions with them at the Israeli embassy. asserted
Herzfeld → know → embassy
Likewise, neither Ms. Barmada nor Ms. Rokhvand had heard of or met Rabbi Herzfeld before their interactions with him during the embassy demonstrations. asserted
Barmada → hear → demonstrations
The first incident occurred in the middle of the day while Ms. Barmada and a few other protesters, not including Ms. Rokhvand, were at the protest site. asserted
Barmada → occur → site
According to Ms. Barmada, a group of men including Rabbi Herzfeld approached the protest site and began slowly walking through the demonstration and "intensely … looking around." uncertain
group → accord → demonstration
Ms. Barmada heard Rabbi Herzfeld call her a "Hamas supporter" and a "terrorist" who supported "raping women" and "beheading babies." asserted
who → hear → babies
Another man in the group called Ms. Barmada a "Nazi bitch" and said that she should "go to the concentration camp." asserted
she → call → camp
Rabbi Herzfeld began speaking about the protesters, pointing at Ms. Barmada and referring to the protesters as the "wicked people" that "we will defeat." asserted
we → begin → that
The group of men again approached the protesters and walked back and forth in front of them, during which time Ms. Barmada and Rabbi Herzfeld exchanged a couple of remarks and Rabbi Herzfeld took something out of his pocket and stood near Ms. Barmada with his group. asserted
Herzfeld → approach → group
Ms. Barmada perceived the interaction to be a threat designed to "intimidate" her. asserted
interaction → perceive → her
She felt "scared" and "harassed" and that the incident was "violating." asserted
incident → feel → ?
Rabbi Herzfeld testified that the first incident occurred on a Jewish holy day commemorating the biblical story of Esther, a Queen who saved the Jewish people from annihilation. asserted
who → testify → annihilation
Rabbi Herzfeld went to the embassy to pray for the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. asserted
Herzfeld → go → Gaza
He and a few others arrived to a "surreal scene" of people "shouting all sorts of terrible things." asserted
people → arrive → things
As the group was walking through the protest, Ms. Barmada spoke into a megaphone and accused the group of "celebrating terror" and being "proud of terrorizing children." asserted
Barmada → walk → children
Rabbi Herzfeld did not call Ms. Barmada a name and did not ask anyone he was with to do so. asserted
he → call → anyone
Rabbi Herzfeld had to yell in order to speak to the group he was with, because the protesters spoke into megaphones while Rabbi Herzfeld was speaking. asserted
Herzfeld → have → megaphones
He spoke about the protesters being akin to the supporters of the king in the story of Esther, because the protesters did not want Israel to defend itself from attacks by Hamas. asserted
Israel → speak → Hamas
Rabbi Herzfeld took out a prayer book but was "not able to concentrate properly" due to the protesters' noise. asserted
Herzfeld → take → noise
Rabbi Herzfeld filed a lawsuit against Ms. Rokhvand and Ms. Barmada in federal court related to the first incident, claiming that the protesters had assaulted him and caused him a noise injury. asserted
protesters → file → injury
He did an interview with Fox News about the lawsuit, during which he characterized the incident as part of a "dangerous trend" of "targeting Jews, attacking Jews." asserted
he → do → Jews
The press coverage regarding the lawsuit made Ms. Rokhvand "very terrified." asserted
Rokhvand → regard → lawsuit
Ms. Rokhvand was concerned because her full name had been publicly associated with claims that she was "doing things … against Jewish people which weren't true" on a day that she was not even present at the embassy. uncertain
she → associate → embassy
Ms. Rokhvand believed that the suit and the resulting press coverage had "put a target on [her] back" as a pro-Palestinian activist. asserted
suit → believe → activist
The second incident took place over a month later, the day after Ms. Barmada and Ms. Rokhvand were served in Rabbi Herzfeld's federal lawsuit. asserted
Barmada → take → lawsuit
According to Ms. Barmada, a car approached the protest site, moving very slowly even though no other cars were on the road. uncertain
cars → accord → road
Ms. Barmada saw a man in the passenger seat staring "intensely" out the window at her with "a very taunting look." asserted
man → see → look
Ms. Barmada was "alarmed" by the situation and then "felt panicked" once she recognized the man in the car as Rabbi Herzfeld. asserted
she → feel → Herzfeld
Ms. Rokhvand also saw these things, which made Ms. Rokhvand "very concerned." asserted
Rokhvand → see → things
Rabbi Herzfeld then rolled down the window of the car with an "eerie smile on his face" and said, "How come you support people raping innocent women?" asserted
you → roll → women
Rabbi Herzfeld then rolled up his window, and the car continued down the street. asserted
car → roll → street
The interaction made Ms. Barmada feel like she was being "harassed" and "watched and monitored." asserted
she → make → ?
According to Rabbi Herzfeld, he did not know that Ms. Barmada or Ms. Rokhvand were at the protest site when he asked his driver to slow down so that he could read the protesters' signs. uncertain
he → accord → signs
Rabbi Herzfeld never went to the embassy "with the understanding" that either Ms. Barmada or Ms. Rokhvand would be there. asserted
Barmada → go → understanding
Rabbi Herzfeld asked the protesters if they supported raping innocent women because he had recently watched a movie about the "weaponization of sexual assault" on October 7th. asserted
he → ask → 7th
…and 35 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support