Short Circuit: An inexhaustive weekly compendium of rulings from the federal courts of appeal

Read the original at Reason ↗
Reason · collected 2026-09-18 · by John Ross analysis

Quick Summary

Short Circuit is a weekly feature compiled by contributors from the Institute for Justice, summarizing significant rulings from federal courts of appeal. Among recent cases discussed are questions about whether Flock cameras reduce crime, debates over SWAT team use in Supreme Court cases, and constitutional challenges to warrantless searches at borders. Another case considers under what circumstances associations can sue on behalf of members, while another addresses the Fourth Amendment requirements for strip searching arrestees and qualified immunity issues.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-18, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In Reason Magazine, John Ross compiled the latest rulings from federal courts of appeal, noting that the Ninth Circuit will not reconsider its decision requiring the VA to build housing for disabled veterans on 600 acres between Santa Monica and Los Angeles. This land was originally deeded to the U.S. in the late 1800s for veteran housing. Ross also highlights a Second Circuit case where associations cannot bring lawsuits under Section 1983 on behalf of their members, a precedent now being reconsidered through a "mini en banc" process to align with other federal circuits. Additionally, Ross touches on a First Circuit ruling that denies plaintiffs the right to proceed under pseudonyms.

Written for “Federal Court Rulings Weekly” on 2026-10-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
103
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
14%
14 of 103 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
65.8
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Federal Court Rulings Weekly
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 25% hedged 5 of 20 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles discuss similar topics related to Flock Safety cameras but describe different aspects and analyses of the issue.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 7 of 57 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles cover different content, one discussing a court decision on USPS and the other compiling rulings from federal courts of appeal.”

Publisher

Reason · 525 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)
2026-10-02
Would a Firing Squad Have Been More 'Humane' for Christa Pike?
2026-09-26
"I Will Not Stand for Being Jerked Around … by Any Lawyer Who Practices Before Me"
2026-09-18
New Article: Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections: Bringing Clarity To The Necessary and Proper Clause
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

John Ross
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The first two trains will be built in Germany with American workers on hand for training—and then eight more Made in America.
🔮 "Technology may make surveillance more convenient, but it does not make the Fourth Amendment's protections any less important."
🔮 Might be a Fourth Amendment violation if the officials searched the home based only on a vague unsubstantiated complaint, but qualified immunity for substantive and procedural due process claims.
🔮 A former mayor even scrapped planned upgrades.
🔮 - In which the Third Circuit holds that restrictions on out-of-state doctors' telemedicine practice are content-based restrictions on speech that would be subject to strict scrutiny … if not for the Founding-era history of gov't licensing of physician speech, which is hard cheese for the plaintiff physicians.
Also by John Ross
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Second Circuit Short Circuit The Second Circuit The Third Circuit the Supreme Court

Subjects

Fifth Circuit ORG · 4× The Second Circuit ORG · 3× the Supreme Court ORG · 3× Second Circuit ORG · 2× Short Circuit ORG · 2× The Third Circuit ORG · 2× First Circuit ORG · 1× New Jersey GPE · 1× SWAT ORG · 1× the Institute for Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

- And in en banc news, the Ninth Circuit will not reconsider its decision that the VA needs to build some housing for disabled veterans on 600 acres between Santa Monica and Los Angeles that were deeded to the U.S. in the late 1800s for housing disabled veterans.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 Might be a Fourth Amendment violation if the officials searched the home based only on a vague unsubstantiated complaint, but qualified immunity for substantive and procedural due process claims.

Claims (103 extracted, 14 hedged)

Do Flock cameras actually reduce crime? asserted
cameras → reduce → crime
The company says a new study shows it. asserted
study → say → it
But, looking at the same study, we see no statistically significant changes in car thefts and car-theft clearances for the average agency. asserted
we → look → agency
- The plaintiff in this First Circuit case isn't allowed to proceed under a pseudonym—and neither is the judge, though she entertains the possibility for a bit. asserted
she → allow → bit
- Can associations bring lawsuits under Section 1983 on behalf of their members? asserted
associations → bring → members
The Second Circuit said "no" in 1973, but since then every federal circuit—citing the Supreme Court—has disagreed. asserted
circuit → say → Court
Luckily, the Second Circuit can fix these sorts of problems with a "mini en banc," a "salutary practice" in which the panel asks the rest of the circuit if they can reverse the earlier precedent. asserted
they → fix → precedent
Second Circuit: Which we now do. asserted
we → do → Which
- Neither the Second Circuit nor the Supreme Court has addressed the constitutionality of warrantless, suspicionless searches of cellphones at the border. asserted
Circuit → address → border
Second Circuit: Which we now do, and it's bad news for this identity thief busted at JFK Airport. asserted
it → do → Airport
The Third Circuit giveth: Henceforth, the Fourth Amendment generally requires a warrant supported by probable cause to strip search an arrestee (deepening a circuit split). asserted
Amendment → require → split
The Third Circuit taketh away: asserted
Circuit → taketh → ?
- New Jersey child welfare officials search a home and later remove children on concerns that mother's boyfriend is abusive and that the home is in poor condition. asserted
home → search → condition
Might be a Fourth Amendment violation if the officials searched the home based only on a vague unsubstantiated complaint, but qualified immunity for substantive and procedural due process claims. uncertain
officials → search → claims
I would look at more evidence and also conclude there's no case sufficiently on point to overcome qualified immunity on the Fourth Amendment claim. uncertain
I → look → claim
The questions "what is a reality show?" and whether "My 600-lb Life" is one have sparked a Fifth Circuit symposium on the party presentation principle. asserted
Life → spark → principle
The argument made on appeal (relating to whether the defendant insurer must pay claims related to the show) was waived below, so we don't have to answer those metaphysical questions. uncertain
we → make → questions
Sometimes we can address arguments waived below—but not when they're the exact opposite of what a party argued below, like here. asserted
party → address → what
Our job is to get the law right and my two cents is "reality show" is ambiguous. asserted
show → get → ?
Like, does that include "Monday Night Football"? asserted
that → include → Football
- Homeowners: Austin violated our constitutional rights by incorporating us into the city's jurisdiction in 2019. asserted
Austin → violate → 2019
District court (2022): This case is barred by the Tax Injunction Act! asserted
case → bar → Act
District court (2025): Oh, I see. asserted
I → see → ?
So it's barred by Pullman abstention! asserted
it → bar → abstention
It is none of those things, and we politely suggest that maybe this six-year-old case could start to move forward a bit. uncertain
case → suggest → things
- After being accused of stalking, New Orleans university student is arrested by campus police. asserted
student → accuse → police
An officer shares info about the arrest with a student reporter, who writes it up in the school paper. asserted
who → share → paper
The arrested student sues the school for defamation, etc. asserted
student → arrest → defamation
(He drops out; the criminal case against him is dropped.) asserted
case → drop → him
And the school will have to keep defending. asserted
school → have → ?
State anti-SLAPP laws don't apply in federal court. asserted
laws → apply → court
Judge Oldham, dubitante: We don't have interlocutory jurisdiction over this. asserted
We → have → this
- Putative class of children brings Section 1983 suit against current and former officers of the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, alleging that they kept the kids in juvenile detention long after the kids were ordered released. asserted
kids → bring → detention
Aha, but you're seeking damages from the officers based on the acts they took as officers of the state, meaning your suit is actually against the state, and the state is sovereign-ly immune. asserted
state → seek → state
Section 1983 literally says people can sue for damages when officers violate their rights "under color of" state law. asserted
officers → say → law
Case undismissed. asserted
Case → undismisse → ?
- 2022 Minnesota gubernatorial candidate, a doctor, ran on the message that Covid-related school closures and vaccine mandates were problematic. asserted
closures → run → message
The state medical board took umbrage, launched multiple investigations into whether he was spreading misinformation. asserted
he → take → misinformation
He hired an attorney, responded to the investigations, and spent countless hours preparing for an in-person conference. asserted
He → hire → conference
No punishment ensues. asserted
punishment → ensue → ?
…and 63 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support