Short Circuit: An inexhaustive weekly compendium of rulings from the federal courts of appeal

Reason Magazine · collected 2026-09-04 · by John Ross analysis
Read the original at Reason Magazine ↗

Summary

A weekly summary of federal court rulings, written by a team at the Institute for Justice. A recent episode of the Bound by Oath podcast examines the doctrine of Younger abstention, which allows government officials to avoid certain lawsuits. The Short Circuit podcast discusses a First Amendment case regarding police recording and ID requirements. Meanwhile, various federal circuits have issued opinions on cases involving Bergdahl's court-martial conviction, a man firing an AK-47 at the White House, and nonbinary individuals' birth certificate requests in Puerto Rico.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-04, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
62
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
3%
2 of 62 hedged
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
86.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-04 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Los Angeles officials in 1966 attempted to prosecute a man for handing out leaflets protesting a fatal police shooting, leading to the doctrine of Younger abstention, which has had a significant impact on civil rights cases. The Institute for Justice examined this case and its effects on the Bound by Oath podcast. Meanwhile, in a separate development, Robert "Bowe" Bergdahl, an infantryman who deserted his post in Afghanistan in June 2009 and was later released in a prisoner swap, received a dishonorable discharge after pleading guilty at court-martial.

Written for “Federal Appeals Court Decisions” on 2026-09-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.35 for article 4026 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-04

Story

📰 Federal Appeals Court Decisions
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason.com
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes a student prayer vote in Santa Fe Independent School District in 1995, while Article B discusses a police shooting protest case from 1966 (Younger v. Harris)”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 14 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles are discussing different court cases and events; Article A mentions a 5-4 ballroom interim docket decision with Chief Justice John Roberts, while Article B discusses the Younger v. Harris case from 1966”
Reason.com
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A refers to an event on September 3, 2005, while Article B discusses a case from 1966.”

Publisher

Reason Magazine · 39 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.026 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.141 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

John Ross
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - In which the Third Circuit holds that restrictions on out-of-state doctors' telemedicine practice are content-based restrictions on speech that would be subject to strict scrutiny … if not for the Founding-era history of gov't licensing of physician speech, which is hard cheese for the plaintiff physicians.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

D.C. Circuit First Circuit Los Angeles Short Circuit the Institute for Justice

Subjects

Bergdahl PERSON · 2× D.C. Circuit ORG · 2× First Circuit ORG · 2× Short Circuit ORG · 2× Younger PERSON · 2× Harris PERSON · 1× Los Angeles GPE · 1× Robert "Bowe" Bergdahl PERSON · 1× The Volokh PERSON · 1× the Institute for Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

- Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over "swaps," which include "any agreement, contract, or transaction … that provides for any purchase, sale, payment, or delivery … that is dependent on the occurrence, nonoccurrence, or the extent of the occurrence of an event or contingency associated with a potential financial, economic, or commercial consequence."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-04
🔮 - In which the Third Circuit holds that restrictions on out-of-state doctors' telemedicine practice are content-based restrictions on speech that would be subject to strict scrutiny … if not for the Founding-era history of gov't licensing of physician speech, which is hard cheese for the plaintiff physicians.

Claims (62 extracted, 2 hedged)

In 1966, Los Angeles officials tried to put a man in prison for handing out leaflets in protest of a fatal police shooting. asserted
officials → try → shooting
Today, we know the case as Younger v. Harris, which kicked off the doctrine of Younger abstention, the bane of many a civil rights plaintiff. asserted
which → know → plaintiff
On this episode, we examine the origins, the impact, and the relentless expansion of the doctrine. asserted
we → examine → doctrine
New on the Short Circuit podcast: You have a First Amendment right to record the police! And a Fourth Amendment right to not show ID! asserted
You → have → ID
But if you exercise those rights, it's OK if you're arrested. asserted
you → exercise → rights
- Infantryman Robert "Bowe" Bergdahl left his post in Afghanistan in June 2009 and was promptly captured by allies of the Taliban. asserted
Bergdahl → leave → Taliban
After five years of captivity and torture, he was released in a prisoner swap. asserted
he → release → swap
At court-martial, he pleaded guilty and was dishonorably discharged. asserted
he → plead → martial
Unknown to him, the judge presiding over his court-martial was seeking a job in the Trump DOJ and had submitted as his writing sample an order holding that then-candidate Trump's comments that Bergdahl was a "traitor" who "deserved the death penalty" did not constitute "unlawful command influence." asserted
who → preside → influence
Bergdahl files suit in federal court to vacate the conviction. asserted
Bergdahl → file → conviction
But we don't have jurisdiction over that sort of thing. asserted
we → have → thing
- Convinced that the president is the antichrist, man fires multiple rounds from an AK-47 at the White House. asserted
man → convince → House
No one is hurt; he pleads guilty to injuring a dwelling. asserted
he → hurt → dwelling
- Because we love you, we do research: asserted
we → love → research
This First Circuit opinion is, in fact, the first time a decision in the Federal Reporter has promised to "fill in the deets[.]" - Puerto Rican "nonbinary persons" challenge the commonwealth's denial of their request to change their birth certificates from what they said when they were born to "X." asserted
they → promise → X.
We're going to assume rational basis applies. asserted
basis → go → ?
And with that, the asserted legitimate interest in protecting privacy sounds good enough. asserted
interest → assert → privacy
- Long Island, N.Y. public-school teachers are ordered by the school district to take down pride flags. asserted
teachers → order → flags
They sue, alleging violations of the First Amendment, among other things. asserted
They → sue → things
The displays covering the walls and doors of grade-school classrooms are something the gov't is allowed to control. asserted
gov't → cover → classrooms
We join the Sixth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits in holding the rules for university professors don't apply here. asserted
rules → join → professors
- In which the Third Circuit holds that restrictions on out-of-state doctors' telemedicine practice are content-based restrictions on speech that would be subject to strict scrutiny … if not for the Founding-era history of gov't licensing of physician speech, which is hard cheese for the plaintiff physicians. asserted
which → hold → physicians
(Wondering if the court's historical analysis is correct? asserted
analysis → wonder → ?
Well, have we got just the article for you.) asserted
we → get → you
So no suppression for this hit-and-hold (a procedure by which police officers use warrants to track a box to a particular address, secure the box, and then search that address) that went awry when the recipient took the box to Apartment 1, rather than the Apartment 2 listed on the warrant, yet police searched Apartment 1 anyway. asserted
police → hit → Apartment
The cop made an isolated mistake—bad news for the defendant, who now must face the music of the discovery of five pounds of meth and a boatload of fentanyl. asserted
who → make → fentanyl
- Woman who has identified as a Jehovah's Witness, a follower of the Nation of Islam, and as a Christian, files a Title VII case against her employer after they fire her for not taking a COVID vaccine. asserted
they → identify → vaccine
Fourth Circuit (over a dissent): She was kind of hazy about how her refusal connected to religion, but we don't expect people to have degrees in theology. asserted
people → connect → theology
This is close enough to go to a jury. asserted
This → go → jury
- Sunset, La. police chief handcuffs unresisting, innocent bystander who does not match description of suspect and then twists the bystander's wrist until it's injured. asserted
it → handcuff → wrist
Now-former chief: That was unreasonable of me, but you know what else is unreasonable? asserted
what → know → me
Me paying this guy $3.5k in restitution. asserted
Me → pay → restitution
A coalition of internet companies sue, seeking a preliminary injunction. asserted
coalition → sue → injunction
The district court denies the injunction, holding that there's no showing of irreparable harm. asserted
court → deny → harm
The chilling of speech and the unrecoverable compliance costs the companies face are irreparable. asserted
companies → face → speech
How can they be irreparably harmed? asserted
they → harm → ?
Maybe the Tennessee AG will just decide not to enforce the law against them. asserted
AG → decide → them
- A once-prominent Cincinnati spine doctor is accused of fraudulently billing Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance companies millions of dollars for hundreds of unnecessary surgeries that left patients worse off. asserted
that → accuse → patients
(He fled to Pakistan after the indictment and remains on the lam.) asserted
He → flee → lam
Civil litigation proceeded in his absence with his insurer defending and his appearing remotely for a few depositions. asserted
his → proceed → depositions
…and 22 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support