Congress to Trump: MORE TARIFFS, PLEASE!

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
The Bulwark · collected 2026-09-17 · by Andrew Egger commentary

Quick Summary

Congress recently passed a Russia sanctions bill that includes sweeping new powers for President Donald Trump to impose tariffs on international trade. This legislation grants Trump the authority to place up to 100 percent tariffs on countries importing Russian energy, aiming to punish Russia economically while supporting Ukraine. Critics argue that these tariff powers may be more appealing to Trump than actual sanctions against Russia, potentially compromising the bill's effectiveness in curbing Russian aggression.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The United States House of Representatives passed a bipartisan sanctions bill targeting Russia on Wednesday, with a final vote of 262 to 159, after more than a year of delays and opposition. The legislation, championed by the late Senator Lindsey Graham, gives President Donald Trump new powers to impose tariffs up to 100 percent on countries like China and India that import energy supplies from Russia. This measure aims to further restrict financial support flowing to Moscow due to its ongoing war in Ukraine. While it received overwhelming bipartisan support in both chambers of Congress, Democrats were divided over concerns about expanding presidential tariff authority, with some fearing potential misuse against allies. The bill now awaits President Trump's signature.

Written for “US Russia Sanctions Bill” on 2026-09-18, grounded in this article and the 16 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.25 Confidence medium
Leaning score -0.25 for article 16077 (medium confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-17

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
66
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
5%
3 of 66 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position
Correction & hedging signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
17
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

Story

📰 US Russia Sanctions Bill
Politics · 17 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 7% hedged 9 of 126
“The articles describe different events occurring on separate days and involving distinct political actions.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 24 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe the passage of a new Russia sanctions bill in Congress on September 17, 2026.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 34 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A focuses on the passage of the sanctions bill with a vote count, while Article B mentions it but covers multiple other events and lacks detailed specifics about the sanctions bill's passage.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 37 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different aspects of the political situation regarding gas prices and tariffs; Article A focuses on internal disagreements within Congress about suspending the gas tax, while Article B reports on members of Congress discussing rising gas prices with constituents.”

Publisher

The Bulwark · 155 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Andrew Egger
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It’s an unambiguously pro-Ukraine piece of legislation that will punish Russia hard for its war of aggression.
2026-09-17 · assertive framing · Congress to Trump: MORE TARIFFS, PLEASE!
🔮 Catherine Rampell and Andrew Egger take on the pure Trumpian madness engulfing the Kennedy Center, which could close as early as Tuesday after Trump’s takeover drove away donors, performers, and audiences.
🔮 Later, he repeated the point: “Again, I wouldn’t call it a war.
2026-09-04 · assertive framing · Iran War? What Iran War?
🔮 You might want to start telling them, Yeah, I’m with him—but only on the good stuff, the stuff you guys like.
2026-09-03 · assertive framing · When You Control the Mail, You Control the Nation
More on this subject from Andrew Egger
When You Control the Mail, You Control the Nation
2026-09-03 · The Bulwark · 52% similar
All 4 articles by Andrew Egger →

Topics

Freedom Caucus GOP Russia the House of Representatives the Washington Sun1

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 10× Russia GPE · 5× Congress ORG · 2× the House of Representatives ORG · 2× Andy Harris PERSON · 1× Freedom Caucus ORG · 1× GOP ORG · 1× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 1× Transportation and Infrastructure Committee ORG · 1× the Washington Sun1 ORG · 1×

Narrative

On Bulwark Takes, TIM MILLER, WILL SOMMER, and SAM STEIN take on a bizarre collection of stories from MAGA and the Republican party, including Milo Yiannopoulos’ messy divorce, a GOP nominee’s ties to the Unite the Right rally, Victor Marx’s latest campaign controversies, and a Republican candidate who fell for a fake Kai Trump account.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 It’s an unambiguously pro-Ukraine piece of legislation that will punish Russia hard for its war of aggression.
2026-09-17 · The Bulwark
Congress to Trump: MORE TARIFFS, PLEASE! · assertive framing

Claims (66 extracted, 3 hedged)

Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris wanted the suspension; Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chair Sam Graves reminded him how ferociously he’d opposed the same idea when the Biden administration had sought one in 2022. asserted
administration → want → 2022
This went over poorly. asserted
This → go → ?
Harris started shouting and banging the desk: “This is fucking war!” asserted
This → start → desk
Then he and his allies stormed out of the room. asserted
he → storm → room
Later, one of them took to Twitter to call Graves an “Establishment elitist” who was “fighting hard” to bring “the swamp” back. asserted
who → take → swamp
Here come those midterms! asserted
midterms → come → ?
Congress Just Gave Trump a Bigger Tariff Hammer. asserted
Congress → give → Hammer
The House of Representatives is getting out of Dodge early today, Speaker Mike Johnson’s last small favor to Donald Trump of the year—and perhaps of his speakership.2 asserted
House → get → speakership.2
But on their way out the door yesterday, the House passed one last piece of major legislation: a strong new sanctions bill on Russia that was the baby of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham. asserted
that → pass → Graham
It’s an unambiguously pro-Ukraine piece of legislation that will punish Russia hard for its war of aggression. asserted
that → ’ → aggression
Last year, when Trump and JD Vance were delivering their infamous Oval Office sandbagging of Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump was routinely parroting talking points Vladimir Putin was whispering in his ear, it would have seemed absurdly Pollyannaish to think the administration would eventually back such a pro-Ukrainian package. asserted
administration → deliver → package
The bill doesn’t just place mandatory sanctions on Russia’s leadership and energy and defense industries. asserted
bill → place → leadership
It also grants Trump sweeping new powers to indulge in his favorite hobby: tariffing the shit out of international trade. asserted
It → grant → trade
When Trump signs the bill, he will acquire the discretionary authority to place tariffs of up to 100 percent on countries that are top importers of Russian energy. asserted
that → sign → energy
If you want to know how Trump was wheedled into backing unambiguously pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia legislation, these shiny new tariff powers surely have a lot to do with it. asserted
powers → want → it
Now, you could make the argument that this is a useful geostrategic tool—that choking off Russia’s war economy is a worthy aim and any tariffs Trump might deploy to that end are at least partially to the good. uncertain
Trump → make → good
But for starters, as Catherine Rampell noted last month, the bill “doesn’t force Trump to use his existing sanction powers” because of the mile-wide exceptions—and it doesn’t give him any new sanctions powers, either. asserted
it → note → powers
Moreover, the tariffs-as-sanctions logic completely ignores the way Trump has actually deployed his tariff powers so far. asserted
Trump → ignore → powers
Over and over, the president has taken tariff authorities that are supposedly narrow in scope and used them to wage his personal Maximum Trade War around the world. asserted
that → take → world
Ever since the Supreme Court slapped down his “liberation day” tariffs, ruling that he couldn’t simply place any tariff on any country for any reason, he’s been trying to recreate his sweeping protectionist trade regime piecemeal, using any tariff authority he can reach. asserted
he → slap → authority
Many of these have been obviously pretextual: In July, with one temporary authority expiring, Trump grabbed another, imposing tariffs on 60 countries supposedly due to forced-labor concerns. asserted
Trump → expire → concerns
For years now, Trump has been exploiting a simple fact: The lawmakers who created our various tariff authorities over the last century never dreamed that a tariff-crazed president would try to stitch them into a patchwork quilt heavy enough to smother global trade. asserted
president → exploit → trade
Today’s Congress has no such excuse; they’ve seen Trump’s tariff crusade. asserted
they → have → crusade
The fact that they just handed him yet another suite of broad tariff powers is nothing short of insane. asserted
they → hand → powers
To their credit, many House Democrats realized all this. asserted
Democrats → realize → this
While Senate Democrats backed the sanctions bill en masse, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries spearheaded his party’s opposition in the lower chamber, arguing that the good end of Russia sanctions did not outweigh the perils of the bill’s tariff provisions. asserted
end → back → provisions
Even some Republicans were getting antsy about them as the vote approached: CNN reported yesterday that more than a dozen GOP House members were lobbying at the eleventh hour to strip the tariff provisions from the bill. asserted
members → get → bill
Now, look: I’m not saying this was an easy call. asserted
this → look → ?
I can at least see how some lawmakers, Republicans and Democrats alike, weighed up the tradeoffs and decided that placing a few more arrows in Trump’s tariff quiver was worth it to get him onside on Ukraine. asserted
him → see → Ukraine
That’s probably why some Democrats voted for it—the bill won 86 votes in the Senate and 262 in the House. asserted
bill → ’ → House
But I can’t help recoiling from how ludicrous it all is. asserted
it → help → ?
Didn’t we all just live through 2025? asserted
we → live → 2025
Don’t we all remember Liberation Day? asserted
we → remember → Day
Haven’t we seen how eager Trump is to throttle the U.S. economy while chasing fantasies of “trillions of dollars coming into our country” in hallucinated foreign investment? asserted
trillions → see → investment
It’s like Trump’s recent appetite for real war has led us to forget how insatiable his appetite is for trade war. asserted
appetite → ’ → war
I’d long since resigned myself to the fact that Congress wasn’t going to bring Trump’s tariff powers to heel. asserted
Congress → resign → heel
But even I didn’t think they would actually gear up—on a bipartisan basis!—to give him even more. asserted
they → think → more
The numbers don’t tell the whole story, argues MARK HERTLING. asserted
HERTLING → tell → story
Here’s Who Trump Should Blame for the Rate Hike… asserted
Trump → ’ → Hike
He promised lower prices and lower interest rates. asserted
He → promise → prices
…and 26 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support