US lawmakers pass bill giving Trump more power to sanction Russia and its enablers

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-17 · by Andrew Roth
Read the original at The Guardian ↗

Summary

The US Congress has passed a bill giving President Donald Trump the authority to impose tariffs up to 100% on major buyers of Russian energy and to issue other sanctions against Russia. The Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, which aims to punish Russia for its involvement in Ukraine by targeting political and military officials along with foreign networks aiding the country’s war efforts, passed with a vote of 262-159. Despite support from the Trump administration and a significant majority in the Senate, the bill faced opposition in the House due to concerns over giving the president excessive powers and potential harm to American allies.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
4%
1 of 24 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
60.0
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
12
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

The United States House of Representatives passed a bipartisan sanctions bill targeting Russia over its ongoing war against Ukraine, following its approval by the Senate. The bill was championed by late Senator Lindsey Graham and voted through on Wednesday with a tally of 262-159. It grants President Donald Trump authority to impose tariffs up to 100% on countries importing energy from Russia, aiming to restrict funds flowing to Moscow. This measure also imposes sanctions on Russian officials, banks, and the shadow fleet facilitating Russian energy trade. However, some Democrats opposed the bill due to concerns that it could give Trump broader tariff powers and potentially harm US allies like Ukraine. Despite these reservations, 58 Democrats supported the bill alongside 203 Republicans, while seven Republicans voted against it. The legislation now heads to President Trump's desk for his signature.

Written for “US Russia Sanctions Bill” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 11 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.50 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.50 for article 14849 (high confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-17

Story

📰 US Russia Sanctions Bill
Politics · 12 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 12 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on the passage of the Lindsey Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act in the US Congress with the exact vote count of 262-159 on the same date.”
Euronews · 0.85 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 21 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe the US Congress passing a bill allowing Trump to impose sanctions on Russia and its energy buyers with identical vote counts.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 27 📰 publisher trust 77
“Both articles describe the identical passage of a Russia sanctions bill in the House on September 17, 2026, with a vote count of 262 to 159.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 34 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe the identical passage of the Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 in the US House of Representatives on September 17, 2026, with the same vote count.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 77
“Both articles describe the US Congress passing a Russia sanctions bill on September 17, 2026.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 1 of 15 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles report on the exact same vote in Congress to pass the sanctions bill targeting Russia and Iran, with identical voting results of 262-159.”
Al Jazeera · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 19 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe the passage of the same sanctions bill targeting Russia, passed by the US Congress on September 17, 2026 with a vote of 262-159.”
South China Morning Post · 0.85 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles describe the passage of the Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 by the US Congress on the same day, targeting Russia's leading energy buyers.”
The Hindu
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A reports the actual passage of the bill in a vote, while Article B indicates the House is set to take up the bill for a vote, suggesting they are describing different stages of the legislative process.”

Publisher

The Guardian · 363 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-07
Former Louisiana mayor completes 90-day jail term for raping 16-year-old boy

Who wrote this

Andrew Roth
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 However the bill faced last-minute hurdles in Congress as members of the Republican party’s isolationist wing were joined by Democrats who warned that Trump could use the bill’s new tariffs authority against allies instead.
🔮 Rubio said that he would seek $45m (£33m) in additional funding from Congress towards efforts aimed at “dismantling these terrorist groups”, although he did not go into details.
Also by Andrew Roth
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Congress Democrats Kremlin Russia Russian

Subjects

Congress ORG · 6× Russia GPE · 6× Democrats NORP · 5× Russian NORP · 4× Ukraine GPE · 4× Kremlin GPE · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Ukrainian NORP · 3× Democrat NORP · 2× House ORG · 2×

Narrative

“Choking off the money funding a war of conquest in Europe is exactly what that authority should be used for, and Congress deciding to do that is Congress doing its constitutional job,” he said, rejecting arguments by Democrats that the bill gave Trump too much authority to slap tariffs on foreign countries.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 However the bill faced last-minute hurdles in Congress as members of the Republican party’s isolationist wing were joined by Democrats who warned that Trump could use the bill’s new tariffs authority against allies instead.

Claims (24 extracted, 1 hedged)

The US Congress has passed a sweeping bill allowing Donald Trump to raise tariffs on top buyers of Russian energy and issue other punishing sanctions against the Kremlin following a pitched battle between lawmakers backing Ukraine and sceptics worried the bill gives the president too much power. asserted
bill → pass → power
The Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 passed in a 262-159 vote on the last day before Congress goes on recess ahead of the midterm elections. asserted
Congress → sanction → elections
Graham, who died earlier this year, co- asserted
who → die → ?
The long delay in the vote was widely considered to be scepticism from the Trump administration, which had opposed additional sanctions and then recently changed its stance to support tabling the bill as efforts to negotiate with the Kremlin to end the war have yielded few results. asserted
efforts → consider → results
However the bill faced last-minute hurdles in Congress as members of the Republican party’s isolationist wing were joined by Democrats who warned that Trump could use the bill’s new tariffs authority against allies instead. uncertain
Trump → face → allies
The bill would mandate new sanctions on Russian political and military officials, and foreign networks helping to supply Russia’s war machine and evade existing sanctions. asserted
bill → mandate → sanctions
It would also target Russia’s so-called fleet of “shadow tankers”, which have allowed the country to continue to ship crude around the world despite sanctions on its energy exports. asserted
country → target → exports
It would also allow Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100% on the top purchasers of Russian energy, including China, as well as other countries helping the Kremlin evade sanctions. asserted
Kremlin → allow → sanctions
Senior Democrats voiced opposition to the bill during a heated floor debate. asserted
Democrats → voice → debate
“Why in the world would this Congress give this president additional authority to visit that kind of economic harm on the American people?” said Hakeem Jeffries, the leading Democrat in the House, during a speech on Wednesday, adding he would vote against the bill. asserted
he → give → bill
Democratic staffers supporting the bill said that it offered a “last chance” to increase sanctions on Russia before Ukraine entered a “long winter”. asserted
Ukraine → support → winter
Russia has improved the drone technology it has used to strike Ukrainian infrastructure as Kyiv has suffered a shortage of anti-air missiles, leaving the country in a dire position. asserted
Kyiv → improve → position
Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican supporting the bill, called it the US Congress’ “Churchill vs Chamberlain Moment on Russia”. asserted
Bacon → support → Russia
“Choking off the money funding a war of conquest in Europe is exactly what that authority should be used for, and Congress deciding to do that is Congress doing its constitutional job,” he said, rejecting arguments by Democrats that the bill gave Trump too much authority to slap tariffs on foreign countries. asserted
bill → choke → countries
The bill passed the Senate last month in a landslide 86-11 vote. asserted
bill → pass → vote
However it faced more pushback in the House of Representatives. asserted
it → face → Representatives
A Tuesday rule vote allowing consideration of Senate amendments to the bill passed by just 214-211, with two renegade Democrats joining Republicans to vote in favour of what they said was an act of support for Ukraine. asserted
they → allow → Ukraine
That vote led to senior Democrats holding terse talks with their fellow party members. asserted
Democrats → lead → members
“I’m proud to represent one of the largest Ukrainian communities in America – people who have lost fathers, mothers, sons and daughters in the fight to defeat fascism,” wrote Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, one of the two Democrat representatives, in a statement on Tuesday. asserted
Perez → ’m → Tuesday
“I’ll always stand with my community’s values, and am grateful for the 86 senators who voted to send this bill to the House. asserted
who → stand → House
My vote today gets us one step closer to enacting these sanctions into law and I look forward to voting tomorrow to cut off the flow of Russian oil money fuelling this war.” asserted
I → get → war
The Ukrainian government has said it supported the bill, and hundreds of pro-Ukrainian activists calling for tougher sanctions on Russia held advocacy talks in Washington DC in the days leading up to the vote. asserted
hundreds → say → vote
“We support any initiative that is in the interest of Ukraine and Ukrainians,” said Denys Sienik, the Chargé d’Affaires at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington DC. asserted
Sienik → support → DC
“So if we are talking about the possibility of putting more pressure on Russia so that it holds the Russian war machine, of course, we are there, and we are grateful to every senator, to every congressman and congresswoman for their voice and, and for their support.” asserted
we → talk → support
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support