Photo via Washington Examiner

What the Lindsay Clancy case reveals about toxic femininity

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Alpert, J. (2026, September 17). What the Lindsay Clancy case reveals about toxic femininity. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/4730452/what-the-lindsay-clancy-case-reveals-about-toxic-femininity/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-17 · by Jonathan Alpert

Quick Summary

A psychotherapist reflects on the public reaction to Lindsay Clancy's case, where she killed her three children and was acquitted due to claims of postpartum psychosis. The article explores whether recognizing one’s own struggles with postpartum depression equates to acknowledging potential culpability in similar extreme cases. It questions if the concept of "toxic femininity" exists when traditionally feminine traits like empathy and loyalty are taken to extremes, leading women to defend Clancy without proper distinction between different mental health conditions.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In October 2023, Lindsay Clancy, a mother from Indiana, killed her three young children before taking her own life, sparking widespread discussions about toxic femininity. Many women identified with Clancy’s suffering due to postpartum depression and other mental health issues but drew the line at condoning such actions. The case raised concerns over how traditionally feminine traits like empathy and loyalty can be distorted into unhealthy behaviors when pushed too far. During Clancy's trial, women supporters gathered outside in pink and held signs declaring "Believe," highlighting a problematic trend where compassion might override judgment, particularly within female communities. Psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert argues that while recognizing shared struggles is important, it should not lead to blind acceptance of harmful behavior under the guise of solidarity.

Written for “Toxic Femininity Revealed” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Toxic Femininity Revealed
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
Hedges 6 of 48 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses a case involving Lindsay Clancy who killed her three young children, while Article B refers to a different mother who killed two sons in their beds and made disturbing Google searches prior to the incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 44 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and perspectives on the Lindsay Clancy case rather than describing the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 5 of 138 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Lindsay Clancy's case, they describe different aspects of it: Article A discusses public reaction and identification with Clancy, while Article B excerpts a transcript from a 60 Minutes interview with Patrick Clancy.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles cover different aspects of the case: one discusses public reaction to Clancy's actions and the concept of toxic femininity, while the other reports on her ex-husband's interview after a mistrial.”
Times of India
Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses public reaction and psychotherapeutic concerns regarding Lindsay Clancy's case, while Article B focuses on an interview with her ex-husband discussing forgiveness and mental illness context.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses public reactions and psychotherapeutic concerns regarding Lindsay Clancy's case, while Article B covers a legal development related to phone data investigation of a holdout juror from her trial.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 8 of 61 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Lindsay Clancy case: one focuses on societal reactions and toxic femininity, while the other reports on a juror's actions post-trial.”
The Independent
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses societal reactions and psychological insights regarding Lindsay Clancy's case, while Article B reports on a juror's perspective from her trial verdict.”
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Lindsay Clancy's case—one focusing on public reaction and identification with her situation, while the other covers a juror's statement about a mistrial.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 3 of 18 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different cases as they involve mothers who killed their children but with distinct details such as number of victims and legal proceedings.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
48
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
6 of 48 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3879 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jonathan Alpert
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Maybe the problem isn't that children can't handle disappointment.
🔮 Hundreds of women looked at Lindsay Clancy, a mother who killed her three young children, and thought: That could have been me.
🔮 Maybe you mistook disagreement for prejudice.
Also by Jonathan Alpert
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

Clancy PERSON · 6× Gaines PERSON · 2× Lia Thomas PERSON · 1× Lindsay Clancy PERSON · 1× Riley Gaines PERSON · 1× University of Kentucky ORG · 1×

Narrative

Consider Riley Gaines, the former University of Kentucky swimmer who became an advocate for sex-based eligibility in women’s sports after competing against transgender swimmer Lia Thomas.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 Hundreds of women looked at Lindsay Clancy, a mother who killed her three young children, and thought: That could have been me.
2026-09-17 · Washington Examiner
What the Lindsay Clancy case reveals about toxic femininity · assertive framing

Claims (48 extracted, 6 hedged)

Hundreds of women looked at Lindsay Clancy, a mother who killed her three young children, and thought: That could have been me. uncertain
That → look → children
As a psychotherapist, that identification concerns me. asserted
identification → concern → me
Not because these women were supporting murder. asserted
women → support → murder
Many recognized their own experiences with postpartum depression, anxiety, exhaustion, or feeling failed by doctors in Clancy’s story. asserted
Many → recognize → story
But recognizing something familiar in another person’s suffering is very different from concluding that you could have become her. uncertain
you → recognize → suffering
We’ve spent years talking about “toxic masculinity.” asserted
We → spend → masculinity
The response to Clancy raises a less comfortable question: Is there such a thing as toxic femininity? asserted
response → raise → femininity
I think there is. asserted
I → think → ?
Not because femininity itself is toxic, any more than masculinity is, but because traditionally feminine virtues can become unhealthy when pushed beyond reason. asserted
virtues → become → reason
Empathy can become over-identification, compassion can crowd out judgment, and loyalty can become an expectation that women defend other women simply because they’re women. asserted
they → become → women
Women gathered outside the courthouse dressed in pink, carried signs saying “Believe,” and talked about their own struggles after childbirth. asserted
Women → gather → childbirth
Many believe Clancy was profoundly ill, failed by the medical system, and shouldn’t be held criminally responsible if she was psychotic at the time. asserted
she → believe → time
That’s a legitimate argument, and it’s essentially the question the jury couldn’t resolve when her trial ended in a mistrial. asserted
trial → ’ → mistrial
But believing Clancy was psychotic is very different from believing that what happened to her could have happened to you. uncertain
happened → believe → you
Postpartum depression affects roughly one in seven mothers. asserted
depression → affect → mothers
Postpartum psychosis is far rarer, occurring in only one or two per 1,000 births. asserted
psychosis → occur → births
Depression doesn’t simply become psychosis because it gets severe. asserted
it → become → ?
Psychosis involves a loss of contact with reality, sometimes including delusions or hallucinations. asserted
Psychosis → involve → delusions
Even then, most people who experience psychosis don’t become homicidal. asserted
who → experience → psychosis
Blurring them can leave mothers with postpartum depression fearing that their illness is the beginning of something far more dangerous when, for nearly all of them, it isn’t. asserted
it → blur → them
In trying to reduce the stigma around postpartum mental illness, we may inadvertently create more of it. uncertain
we → try → it
Empathy doesn’t require erasing distinctions. asserted
Empathy → require → distinctions
We can recognize something familiar in another person’s suffering while acknowledging that her experience and actions may be profoundly different from our own. uncertain
experience → recognize → own
But once someone else’s story becomes our story, judgment gets harder. asserted
judgment → become → ?
Questioning her can begin to feel like questioning ourselves. asserted
Questioning → question → ourselves
We’ve turned “women supporting women” into a cultural virtue. asserted
We → turn → virtue
Women have stood together against discrimination, abuse, and exclusion, sometimes when nobody else would stand with them. asserted
nobody → stand → them
But solidarity loses its meaning when it becomes an obligation rather than choice. asserted
it → lose → meaning
Solidarity can also become an expectation: Believe her. asserted
Solidarity → become → her
Questioning another woman can start to look like betrayal. asserted
Questioning → question → betrayal
This solidarity isn’t extended equally to all women. asserted
solidarity → extend → women
Consider Riley Gaines, the former University of Kentucky swimmer who became an advocate for sex-based eligibility in women’s sports after competing against transgender swimmer Lia Thomas. asserted
who → consider → Thomas
Gaines says she is defending fairness and opportunities for female athletes. asserted
she → say → athletes
For doing so, she has faced intense criticism and accusations of intolerance. asserted
she → do → intolerance
The very women we’re told should be heard and believed can quickly find that principle withdrawn when their views become inconvenient. asserted
views → tell → ?
You can disagree with Gaines. asserted
You → disagree → Gaines
But it’s difficult to miss the contradiction in a culture that celebrates women for finding their voices, then condemns some of them for what they say. asserted
they → ’ → what
“Women supporting women” can end up meaning women supporting the right women. asserted
Women → support → women
At that point, solidarity starts looking a lot more like conformity. asserted
solidarity → start → conformity
None of this settles what should happen to Clancy. asserted
what → settle → Clancy
…and 8 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support