Photo via The Sydney Morning Herald

Why AI hasn’t taken your job yet

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Napier-Raman, K. (2026, September 17). Why AI hasn’t taken your job yet. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/why-ai-hasn-t-taken-your-job-yet-20260917-p60y6e.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-09-17 · by Kishor Napier-Raman

Quick Summary

The article discusses the concerns raised by artificial intelligence (AI) companies like OpenAI and Anthropic over potential risks associated with rapid AI development, including fears of job displacement and existential threats. Despite these warnings, recent employment data from various countries shows no immediate signs of mass unemployment due to AI; for example, the United States added 162,000 jobs in September 2023. The article suggests that while AI is changing job markets, it also creates new opportunities and questions whether fears about a job apocalypse are overstated or premature.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

AI-related stocks declined globally on Monday, following warnings from leading AI executives about the need for a slowdown in development to address safety concerns. This selloff was particularly evident among tech giants like Nvidia, which saw its shares fall by over 3%, and other chipmakers such as Micron Technology, down more than 5%. The broader Nasdaq Composite index dropped by 0.6% while the S&P 500 fell 0.5%.

The sell-off was exacerbated by Donald Trump's dismissive comments on social media, where he labeled calls for regulation of AI a "sick conspiracy" and suggested that only a strong leader could prevent misuse, implying his own leadership as sufficient guard against potential risks.

Meanwhile, the Australian sharemarket futures pointed to a 0.2% slide at the open, mirroring global trends. Despite these challenges, some non-AI-focused stocks showed resilience, such as Intuit, which gained 5.5%.

Written for “AI Development Slowdown Concerns” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 11 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Development Slowdown Concerns
Technology · 12 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 19% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 34 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI's impact and regulation in technology and healthcare respectively.”
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 8 of 66 claims Outlet record 97/100
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 14 claims
“The articles discuss different topics within the broader context of AI and economic concerns; one focuses on a call for slowing down AI development, while the other discusses raising interest rates to curb inflation.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 7 of 72 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss related topics about AI development and its implications but describe different specific events and focus on distinct aspects of the broader issue.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 24 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different events: one discusses a call for AI development slowdown and another reports on Anthropic's partnership with Accenture to evaluate AI models.”
The Independent
Hedges 5 of 39 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles cover different aspects of AI development: one discusses a call for slowing down AI due to safety concerns, while the other focuses on the potential for AI models to achieve autonomous improvement.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles cover different aspects of the AI debate and do not describe the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI risks from distinct company leaders.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different viewpoints on AI risks but do not describe the same specific incident or happening.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one discusses calls for slowing down AI development by industry leaders, while the other reports on UN experts warning against apocalyptic rhetoric regarding AI risks.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
31
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
19%
6 of 31 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
12
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 5735 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kishor Napier-Raman
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Ozempic, the injectable weight loss drug which has become a transformative weapon in the war against obesity and a cultural phenomenon in its own right, might seem like the sworn enemy of the fast food industry.
2026-09-24 · assertive framing · How McDonald’s is grappling with the Ozempic boom
🔮 The source of Zhang’s online animus is Keith Rabois, the Trump-aligned Silicon Valley venture capitalist who has repeatedly accused Airwallex of being vulnerable to legal obligations to assist with Chinese Communist Party espionage upon request, on the basis that it could be compelled to hand American users’ data to Beijing.
🔮 Given the scale of Heraghty’s very recent fall from grace at Super Retail Group, it was utterly predictable that scandal would follow him to the new job.
🔮 That announcement prompted his former colleague, Evan Hurbinger, to claim that there was a greater than 10 per cent chance that AI would “kill all humans” within the next decade.
2026-09-17 · assertive framing · Why AI hasn’t taken your job yet
Also by Kishor Napier-Raman
How McDonald’s is grappling with the Ozempic boom
2026-09-24 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Anthropic China Federal Reserve OpenAI The United States

Subjects

Australia GPE · 3× Anthropic ORG · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× The United States GPE · 2× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Elon Musk PERSON · 1× Evan Hurbinger PERSON · 1× Jacob Poxon PERSON · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Fortunately, all this has been rejected by US President Donald Trump, who has insisted that attempts to slow down AI are a “sick conspiracy” to let China get ahead, creating the absurd situation where highly valuable companies are begging a recalcitrant government to regulate them.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 That announcement prompted his former colleague, Evan Hurbinger, to claim that there was a greater than 10 per cent chance that AI would “kill all humans” within the next decade.
2026-09-17 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Why AI hasn’t taken your job yet · assertive framing

Claims (31 extracted, 6 hedged)

OpenAI and Anthropic, the dominant frontier labs, have thrown plenty of elbows in their race toward stratospheric, trillion-dollar stockmarket listings. asserted
OpenAI → throw → listings
But this week, Sam Altman and Dario Amodei, their respective leaders, reached a rare unity ticket along with fellow AI kingpin Elon Musk, calling for a slowdown on artificial intelligence development in the name of saving humanity. asserted
Altman → reach → humanity
This latest bout of fear coming from inside the house began after Anthropic researcher Jacob Poxon resigned last week, accusing the companies of “gambling with our lives”. asserted
Poxon → come → lives
That announcement prompted his former colleague, Evan Hurbinger, to claim that there was a greater than 10 per cent chance that AI would “kill all humans” within the next decade. uncertain
AI → prompt → decade
Fortunately, all this has been rejected by US President Donald Trump, who has insisted that attempts to slow down AI are a “sick conspiracy” to let China get ahead, creating the absurd situation where highly valuable companies are begging a recalcitrant government to regulate them. asserted
government → reject → them
They are less worried about geopolitical rivalry or the prospect of rogue agents creating a devastating virus than whether the machines will take their jobs. asserted
machines → create → jobs
In May 2025, the Anthropic boss Amodei predicted that half of all entry-level white-collar jobs would be obliterated in the next five years, sending unemployment rates into the double digits. uncertain
half → predict → digits
If there is perhaps one micro-dose of optimism among all the bleak AI news, it is that the tsunami hasn’t yet hit. asserted
tsunami → be → news
Instead, employment data from around the world paints a messy, paradox-filled picture. asserted
data → paint → picture
The United States added 162,000 jobs in September, exceeding expectations and strengthening the case for the country’s Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, which it did for the first time since 2023 on Wednesday, much to Trump’s chagrin. asserted
it → add → chagrin
Here in Australia, unemployment crept up unexpectedly to 4.5 per cent in July, its highest rate in the post-COVID era in trend terms. asserted
unemployment → creep → terms
While it’s too soon to tell whether this is the start of a longer-term trend, a 0.1 per cent increase does not seem like the start of a job apocalypse. asserted
increase → ’ → apocalypse
The rose-tinted view of the AI boom suggests that, like every past industrial revolution, the latest technological rupture will destroy many jobs but create different new ones. uncertain
rupture → suggest → ones
Some recent number-crunching in The Economist magazine found that AI had created around 1 million new jobs in the United States, with many attributable to the data centre construction boom. asserted
many → find → boom
The problem is that while data centres are delivering reliable, well-paid blue-collar work, those jobs are temporary. asserted
jobs → deliver → work
These AI “factories” don’t resemble the real thing when it comes to employment. asserted
it → resemble → employment
Then there’s the fact that they have become a widely despised symbol of everything people resent about AI, with opposition to their development cutting across political lines and threatening to stall that job explosion. asserted
opposition → ’ → explosion
Whether that infrastructure delivers in Australia is also contested. asserted
delivers → deliver → Australia
The local sector’s lobbyists insist it will “support” 935,000 jobs. asserted
it → insist → jobs
But as this masthead recently reported, that figure comes from a line in a 2024 report by consulting firm Mandala (which has partnered with OpenAI in the past) and conflates data centre work with all tech sector jobs. asserted
which → report → jobs
More importantly, the report was commissioned by five of the country’s biggest data centre operators. asserted
report → commission → operators
Separately, economic think tank the e61 Institute claims there are only around 11,500 data centres workers in Australia nationally. uncertain
Institute → claim → Australia
Even if data centres are the future, it’s quite a stretch to imagine soft-handed software engineers (let alone journalists) to retrain as construction workers. asserted
engineers → ’ → workers
Beyond blue-collar work, AI is still causing ruptures in the labour market. asserted
AI → cause → market
Research from Princeton University’s Sania Edlich and Apollo Global Management chief economist Tortsen Slok found that rather than destroying jobs, AI was stifling wage growth. asserted
AI → find → growth
Those “different” jobs created by the AI boom could well be repetitive, boring and lower paid. uncertain
jobs → create → boom
The next few years could see Australia struggle with the “K-shaped” economy which has characterised the United States post-COVID in which the asset-rich few thrive thanks to a surging stock market and corporate profits, even as wages stagnate for the many. uncertain
wages → see → many
The problem is that AI is moving at such a fast clip that there are many people with opinions, but few are truly informed. asserted
few → move → opinions
Now, it is the frontier lab bosses, the people who have seen what the technology can do, who are sounding the loudest alarms. asserted
who → see → alarms
At least the unemployment rate probably doesn’t matter too much if humanity is wiped out. asserted
humanity → matter → ?
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. asserted
newsletter → deliver → stories
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support