Behind China's 'fearmongering' claim is a fundamental fear about AI

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-09-16 · by Allyson Horn
Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗

Summary

US tech leaders warn that China's lead in artificial intelligence could pose significant dangers to the United States and the world, advocating for restrictions on technology sales to Beijing. In response, Chinese officials through state media accuse these US executives of "fearmongering" and criticize the calls for a slowdown as counterproductive to global AI governance. However, behind this rhetoric, China’s own top intelligence official recently highlighted concerns about AI threatening political stability and security within China, alongside other risks like warfare and attacks on critical infrastructure.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
4%
1 of 26 hedged
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
60.2
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
10
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Minister Chen Yixin, head of China’s State Security, warned that artificial intelligence (AI) poses significant national security threats to China, including risks to political and ideological stability. Published on September 13, 2026, Chen accused foreign entities of using generative AI technologies to spread harmful information against China. He also noted that AI is now the main battleground for global technological competition between major powers.

Chinese officials are dismissing calls from U.S. tech leaders like Dario Amodei (CEO of Anthropic) and Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI) to slow down AI development due to safety concerns, describing these as "fearmongering" and part of a Cold War playbook aimed at containing China. Chinese leader Xi Jinping is scheduled to meet with U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington later that month, where AI governance and safety will be key topics for discussion.

The Global Times, a state-backed newspaper, criticized Amodei's call for slowing AI development as an attempt to hinder China’s progress. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged international cooperation on AI rather than engaging in confrontation or malicious competition.

Written for “China AI Rivalry Usa” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 9 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.35 Confidence high 2 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning score +0.35 for article 14536 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-17

Story

📰 China AI Rivalry Usa
Politics · 10 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 15% hedged 8 of 55 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles discuss the warning from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei about slowing down AI development and China's response, indicating they are reporting on the same specific incident.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles discuss different aspects of the tech and AI race between China and the US, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles discuss different aspects of international relations, with Article A focusing on global opinion towards the US and China, while Article B focuses on AI development concerns related to China.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles discuss related tensions between the US and China regarding espionage and AI development, but describe different specific incidents and timeframes.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 50% hedged 1 of 2 📰 publisher trust 96
“While both articles discuss reactions to calls for slowing AI development, they describe different phases or aspects of the incident: Article A reports China's initial stance on international cooperation and rejecting threat narratives, whereas Article B focuses on Beijing’s response to specific warnings from US tech leaders.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 1 of 11 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss different aspects of concerns around AI regulation and competition, with Article A focusing on Trump dismissing fears as a hoax and Article B discussing China's response to warnings about AI development from US tech leaders.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 46 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles cover different speakers and perspectives on AI regulation, with Article A focusing on Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon at a 'Pro-Human Assembly,' while Article B discusses US tech leaders' concerns about China's AI development.”
NPR · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 23% hedged 6 of 26 📰 publisher trust 60
“While both articles discuss reactions to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's call to curb China's AI development, Article A reports on Beijing's immediate response, while Article B seems to summarize the broader context and implications of Amodei's warning and subsequent Chinese reaction.”
NBC News · 0.88 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 16% hedged 6 of 37 📰 publisher trust 95
“While both articles discuss China's dismissal of calls to slow down AI development, Article A focuses on a broader context and comments from President Trump, while Article B delves into the perspective behind China’s claim and includes more specific details about tech leaders' warnings.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 94
“While both articles discuss reactions to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's call to curb China's AI development, they describe different phases of the incident: Article A reports on the immediate response by China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while Article B analyzes the broader context and China's subsequent reaction through state media.”

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 517 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-15
Canberra man posed as teenage girl to obtain child abuse material
2026-09-07
'Her career's finished': Fugitive Sydney developer's daughter avoids jail

Who wrote this

Allyson Horn
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei issued a blunt assessment that a "Chinese lead in AI would pose great danger for the United States and the world" and urged Washington to restrict sales of key tech to Beijing.
🔮 "After the incident, the organising committee immediately closed off and isolated the affected area and track, and completed comprehensive disinfection," organisers said. "Relevant equipment was removed from the venue, and waste was disposed of in accordance with municipal waste-management standards." The organisers also said they would replace flooring at the venue to protect future athlete health.
Also by Allyson Horn
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Beijing China Chinese Washington the United States

Subjects

China GPE · 14× Beijing GPE · 4× Washington GPE · 2× Chinese NORP · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Foreign Ministry ORG · 1× Guo Jiakun PERSON · 1× Xi Jinping PERSON · 1× the Chinese Communist Party's ORG · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun also accused the US executives of "fearmongering" and warned that "vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance, which serves no-one's interests". But the phrase "vicious competition" is a hollow accusation for China to lob at Washington, given it is also engaged in the race for AI supremacy.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei issued a blunt assessment that a "Chinese lead in AI would pose great danger for the United States and the world" and urged Washington to restrict sales of key tech to Beijing.
2026-09-17 · ABC News (AU)
Behind China's 'fearmongering' claim is a fundamental fear about AI · assertive framing

Claims (26 extracted, 1 hedged)

When the leaders of major US tech groups all echoed calls to "slow the pace" of artificial intelligence development, the underlying message targeted a specific and, in their view, uncontained threat: China. asserted
message → echo → threat
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei issued a blunt assessment that a "Chinese lead in AI would pose great danger for the United States and the world" and urged Washington to restrict sales of key tech to Beijing. asserted
lead → issue → Beijing
The warning was met by a forceful rejection from Beijing, which used state media to label the warnings as a "Cold War playbook" for the AI sector. asserted
which → meet → sector
China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun also accused the US executives of "fearmongering" and warned that "vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance, which serves no-one's interests". But the phrase "vicious competition" is a hollow accusation for China to lob at Washington, given it is also engaged in the race for AI supremacy. asserted
it → accuse → supremacy
China warns about AI risks amid race for dominance asserted
China → warn → dominance
China's ambitious goals to integrate AI into 90 per cent of the country's economy by 2030 are underpinned by its plans to ultimately achieve worldwide dominance in the sector. asserted
goals → integrate → sector
To do so, it wants to be entirely self-sufficient and position itself as the world leader that other countries would have to rely on for their infrastructure and tech. asserted
countries → do → infrastructure
China has spent decades perfecting the industry-supremacy playbook in areas like electric vehicles and solar panels, and AI is next on the agenda. asserted
AI → spend → agenda
So it's no surprise China is resisting any calls for a slowdown — especially when its main rival is still surging ahead. asserted
rival → resist → slowdown
But that doesn't mean China is unbothered by the potential threats that AI could pose in the future. uncertain
AI → mean → future
Over recent months, Beijing officials have been more openly vocal about the risks surrounding the technology, including President Xi Jinping who warned AI "should always remain under human control". asserted
AI → surround → control
And just a few days ago, in a further sign of China's growing unease around the impacts of technological developments, the country's top intelligence official released an illuminating article that listed Beijing's perceived AI threats. asserted
that → grow → threats
Prominent among them was the potential for AI to threaten the Chinese Communist Party's hold on power. asserted
AI → threaten → power
"Artificial intelligence is penetrating all aspects of human society at an unprecedented speed, breadth, and depth, profoundly reshaping the global economic structure, power dynamics, innovation paradigms, and social governance logic," Ministry of State Security Chen Yixin wrote. asserted
Yixin → penetrate → Security
"Various hostile forces and individuals with ulterior motives abuse generative artificial intelligence technologies such as deepfake audio and video, AI-generated text and images, and intelligent online trolls … waging a propaganda war and a cognitive war against us, directly threatening our political security, institutional security, and ideological security." asserted
forces → abuse → security
The article also listed other risks, including in areas of warfare, social governance and attacking critical infrastructure. asserted
article → list → infrastructure
Notably, it did not canvass the same concerns about AI posing an existential threat to humanity that have been expressed in America. asserted
that → canvass → America
Both China and US want to win AI race asserted
China → want → race
China's response to AI's projected hazards has been an open call for worldwide cooperation on AI technologies, including proposals that would put China at the forefront of global AI governance. asserted
that → project → governance
Earlier this year, it set up The World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization, which aimed to bring governments together to develop frameworks for the "beneficial, safe and fair" future of AI. asserted
which → set → AI
About 30 countries signed up for the initiative — but none of them were Western. asserted
none → sign → them
At the BRICS summit in early September, President Xi also proposed creating a community for open-source AI and letting countries with less developed technological sectors tap into China's expertise. asserted
countries → propose → expertise
All of these initiatives put China at the helm of discussions and give it the power to embed its own institutions in developing a global rule book. A global AI conversation that's led by China also ultimately serves Beijing's political and diplomatic ambitions to rival the hegemony of the United States and win the AI race. asserted
that → put → race
Analysts have said managing the risks of AI and future development will require the leaders of China and America to have meaningful engagement on the issue — which, at the moment, seems unlikely. asserted
which → say → moment
The opportunity for a starting point on those conversations is likely to present itself next week when Xi is due to meet US President Donald Trump at the White House. asserted
Xi → start → House
But in the AI race, where both leaders want their team to win, there are low expectations that either side would be willing to give any ground, while the other still surges ahead. asserted
other → want → ground
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support