The Senate flew back into session this week after their long summer break.
asserted
Senate → fly → break
One reason for their urgency (and the resulting chaos) was that in the days just before the lawmakers reconvened, a whistleblower in the artificial intelligence industry dramatically claimed the frontier companies’ products were racing down the path of danger, where one of the possible outcomes is human extinction.
asserted
one → result → outcomes
In response to the alarmist thread, the CEOs of the three major AI companies—Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI—declared that America’s elected officials need to step in and install guardrails for their industry.
asserted
officials → declare → industry
President Donald Trump called this nonsense yesterday and claimed that the only thing necessary to prevent an AI apocalypse is a “STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT.”
asserted
thing → call → apocalypse
That didn’t instill a great deal of confidence on Capitol Hill, to put it mildly.
asserted
That → instill → it
But as these nervy conversations continued to play out in public, I started to wonder if the AI leaders might have a less noble and more familiar goal in mind than preventing the end of the world: regulatory capture.
uncertain
leaders → continue → world
Most senators I raised this possibility with either hadn’t considered it or refused to entertain the idea.
asserted
I → raise → idea
Regulatory capture is what happens when the government’s efforts to regulate a particular industry end up turning it into a kind of cartel economy where certain large companies are given protected status.
asserted
companies → happen → status
It can occur for several reasons.
asserted
It → occur → reasons
One is the revolving-door problem.
asserted
One → revolve → ?
Members of Congress will employ staffers who move in and out of the industries their bosses are responsible for regulating.
asserted
bosses → employ → industries
It’s probably no surprise that the AI industry’s ranks of lobbyists and consultants are packed with former Capitol Hill staff from both parties, as well as former House members and senators whose terms have expired.
asserted
terms → ’ → parties
Earlier this month, OpenAI also hired the daughter of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
asserted
OpenAI → hire → Schumer
A second is that highly technical industries are often too complex for members of Congress to comprehend at a detailed level,1 so they enlist the very industry insiders they are seeking to regulate to help them draft the regulations.2
When I spoke with senators who are working on this issue, some indicated they are taking seriously the possibility that a push for regulatory capture is already happening.
“That’s certainly something that members of Congress have to be mindful of,” Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said about the possibility that AI executives have ulterior motives for their recent claims about the risks posed by their products.
uncertain
executives → comprehend → products
“Safety has to come first,” Padilla added.
asserted
Padilla → have → ?
“That applies to everybody, large or small.”
asserted
That → apply → everybody
“I mean, some of these CEOs are bankrolling efforts to try to stop states from regulating them,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told me.
asserted
Murphy → mean → me
“So it would be naïve not to doubt their sincerity.”
asserted
it → doubt → sincerity
“We’ll eventually have to have something,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said about advancing AI regulations in Congress.
asserted
Tuberville → have → Congress
We had to figure out what it was about, how to handle it.
asserted
it → have → it
But right now, we just need to make sure we do the right thing and understand it’s already here—it’s not coming.
asserted
it → need → thing
“We need competition.
asserted
We → need → competition
A lot of this stuff—I think—comes from China, and it’s some kind of propaganda because they know that we’re into it pretty good.
asserted
we → think → it
Whoever masters it will probably have an edge.”
asserted
masters → master → edge
Tuberville’s claim that the Chinese government is fueling AI fears and discontent in the United States has some evidentiary support.
uncertain
government → fuel → support
You’ve reached the obligatory “support our work” box.
asserted
You → reach → box
We’ll spare you the hard sell.
asserted
We → spare → sell
If you like what we do at The Bulwark, please consider being part of our community.
asserted
we → like → community
Other senators’ understanding of the issue seemed limited to either what they’ve heard while watching television news, or their own preexisting desires to regulate the AI industry.3
“To be honest, I hadn’t thought about that in the sense that . . . the interview I’ve seen seemed genuine,” said Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.), probably referring to one of the interviews of whistleblower Jacob Coxon.
asserted
Boozman → seem → Coxon
It would be different if [the CEOs] were the only few raising the alarm.”
asserted
CEOs → raise → alarm
Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio) sidestepped the issue of regulatory capture, and instead used the auto industry as a metaphor to put responsibility back on the shoulders of the companies rather than lawmakers:
If an automaker made a car and they said, “Yeah, this car’s dangerous.
asserted
car → sidestep → car
Probably shouldn’t drive it,” well, you’d believe them, right?
asserted
you → drive → them
And they should never release that car.
asserted
they → release → car
So these folks, if they really believe their product is dangerous, then they have an obligation not to release it.
asserted
they → believe → it
Husted’s example might have made more sense if the auto industry hadn’t been the subject of regulatory capture case studies.
uncertain
industry → make → studies
It’s also notable that one of the AI CEOs in question is also an electric car mogul whose vehicles have been known to spontaneously combust.
asserted
vehicles → ’ → question
Elon Musk has made a habit of deceiving legislators and the public, demonstrated no remorse for the human lives lost as a result of his involvement in the government, and pursued a personal fortune unrivaled in modern history.
asserted
Musk → make → history
A former board member at Sam Altman’s company described Altman as having an “almost a sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences that may come from deceiving someone.”
uncertain
that → describe → someone
Of the three, Dario Amodei seems like the straightest shooter.
asserted
Amodei → seem → shooter
Sen. Murphy credited the Anthropic CEO’s intentions over those of Altman and Musk.
asserted
Murphy → credit → Altman
…and 29 more, not listed.
The Aporia
