Photo via The Sydney Morning Herald

High Court to hear Hanson challenge to racist hate speech laws

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Begley, P., & Maley, J. (2026, November 5). High Court to hear Hanson challenge to racist hate speech laws. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/high-court-to-hear-hanson-challenge-to-racist-hate-speech-laws-20261105-p61br7.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-11-05 · by Patrick Begley, Jacqueline Maley

Quick Summary

Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, has been granted special leave by the High Court to challenge Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits racial discrimination and vilification. The case stems from Hanson's 2022 tweet directed at Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi, in which she used a racist slur. The Full Federal Court previously found Hanson guilty of hate speech under Section 18C. Now, the High Court will examine whether this section is constitutional and if it conflicts with the implied freedom of political communication.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The High Court of Australia has granted Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, special leave to appeal a 2024 ruling that found her tweet directed at Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi was racist hate speech. The exchange began in 2022 after Faruqi commented on social media about not mourning Queen Elizabeth II as "the leader of a racist empire." Hanson responded with the now-infamous tweet telling Faruqi to “piss off back to Pakistan.” This case is expected to challenge the constitutionality of Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits racial discrimination and vilification. The High Court will determine whether these laws unduly restrict Australia's implied freedom of political communication.

Written for “Pauline Hanson Appeals Racial Discrimination Ruling” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 130701 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 Pauline Hanson Appeals Racial Discrimination Ruling
Politics · 4 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 28 claims Outlet record 66/100
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 67/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
6
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 6 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 6213 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Patrick Begley
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The case is expected to test the limits of the implied freedom of political communication, a doctrine which the High Court has applied for decades but with an ongoing and at-times heated debate over its reach.
🔮 The shift will impact up to 600 occupants including active personnel, up to a dozen defence families including those with young children, along with public servants, reservists and cadets.
🔮 The decision to allow a massive NSW coal mine to run until 2045 will be fought in court, legal experts predict, after the High Court struck down a separate approval for failing to grapple with the climate impact of Australian coal being burned in foreign power plants.
🔮 The Minns government is still mulling a proposal to allow volunteer members of a Jewish security group to be armed at public religious events, even after the NSW Police announced a heavily armed, specially trained squad of 250 officers will be deployed with long-arm rifles.
🔮 Approval for a major coal mine expansion has been declared invalid by the High Court in a decision that will force NSW planning authorities to reckon with emissions from Australian coal burnt overseas.
🔮 The pool Whichever One Nation candidate runs for the seat of Capricornia at the next federal election could find themselves in a fight watched around the country.
Also by Patrick Begley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Patrick Begley →
Jacqueline Maley
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The case is expected to test the limits of the implied freedom of political communication, a doctrine which the High Court has applied for decades but with an ongoing and at-times heated debate over its reach.
🔮 Dr Tahlia Gordon, the Senior Tribunal member who heard the case, said she was satisfied “that if Mr Papadopoulos attended Sydney Elements or Showgirls, there is a sufficient risk that he could engage in trouble-making behaviour and cause a problem”.
🔮 You will only see the post on Overall’s Facebook page if it pops up in the online bubble that is perfectly tailored to you, courtesy of a tech company’s algorithm, breeding an isolation that is anything but pro-social.
🔮 She took only three questions, and couldn’t answer the most pressing inquiry – whether the United States has suspended intelligence-sharing with Ukraine.
Also by Jacqueline Maley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

High Court One Nation Section 18C the High Court the Racial Discrimination Act

Subjects

the High Court ORG · 2× Greens NORP · 1× High Court ORG · 1× Mehreen Faruqi PERSON · 1× One Nation ORG · 1× Pakistan GPE · 1× Pauline Hanson PERSON · 1× Queensland GPE · 1× the Full Federal Court ORG · 1× the High Court’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Queensland senator applied for special leave to appear before the High Court after the Full Federal Court upheld findings that she had subjected Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi to racist hate speech with her “piss off back to Pakistan” tweet, sent in 2022.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 The case is expected to test the limits of the implied freedom of political communication, a doctrine which the High Court has applied for decades but with an ongoing and at-times heated debate over its reach.
2026-11-05 · The Sydney Morning Herald
High Court to hear Hanson challenge to racist hate speech laws · assertive framing

Claims (6 extracted, 0 hedged)

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has won her bid to mount a High Court challenge arguing that Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act should be declared unconstitutional and torn up. asserted
Section → win → Act
The Queensland senator applied for special leave to appear before the High Court after the Full Federal Court upheld findings that she had subjected Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi to racist hate speech with her “piss off back to Pakistan” tweet, sent in 2022. asserted
she → apply → 2022
The case is expected to test the limits of the implied freedom of political communication, a doctrine which the High Court has applied for decades but with an ongoing and at-times heated debate over its reach. asserted
Court → expect → reach
“Special leave to appeal is granted,” read the High Court’s single-line ruling, released on Thursday afternoon. asserted
ruling → appeal → afternoon
The ruling was made by Chief Justice Stephen Gageler as well as Justices Michelle Gordon, James Edelman, Jayne Jagot, Jacqueline Gleeson and Robert Beech-Jones. asserted
ruling → make → Gageler
The seventh justice, Simon Steward, has returned to the court this month after several months’ sick leave. asserted
justice → return → leave
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support