Why all the president’s women are looks-maxxed, blonde, and more likely to be fired

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Maley, J. (2026, October 16). Why all the president’s women are looks-maxxed, blonde, and more likely to be fired. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/why-all-the-president-s-women-are-looks-maxxed-blonde-and-more-like-to-be-fired-20261017-p615y7.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-10-16 · by Jacqueline Maley

Quick Summary

Katie Zacharia, who served as White House press secretary for just five days under President Donald Trump, was fired after it emerged that she had not passed any state bar exam. Despite her initial claim of working on international transaction law in China, Zacharia admitted to the media that she did not practice law there or anywhere else. The article highlights a pattern where women appointed by Trump are more likely to be terminated compared to men, with recent examples including Kimberly Guilfoyle being dismissed as US Ambassador to Greece.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Summary unavailable.

Written for “President's Women Staff Dynamics” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 86135 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-16

Story

📰 President's Women Staff Dynamics
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses Hillary Clinton's criticism of the Trump administration regarding the hiring criteria for press secretaries, while Article B focuses on Katie Zacharia's short tenure and dismissal as White House press secretary.”
The Hindu
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 1 of 13 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes Katie Zacharia's defense of her legal credentials during a press conference or appearance, while Article B discusses her firing after five days in the job and subsequent questioning about her legal qualifications.”
Euronews
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 16 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes Katie Zacharia's comments about China and her legal credentials, while Article B discusses her firing after five days in the job due to questions about her bar exam qualifications.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 23 📰 publisher trust 68
“The articles describe different stages of the same general incident, with Article A covering Katie Zacharia facing scrutiny on Fox News during her tenure as press secretary and Article B describing her firing after five days in the role.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 9% hedged 5 of 57 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A describes Katie Zacharia's debut and initial performance, while Article B discusses her firing a few days later.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 14% hedged 4 of 28 📰 publisher trust 77
“Article A discusses mounting questions about Katie Zacharia's resume, while Article B mentions her firing after five days as press secretary.”
Mar-a-Lago Face Won’t Save You different event · 80%
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 26 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of Katie Zacharia's tenure as White House press secretary, with Article A focusing on her first briefing and its reception, while Article B discusses her dismissal and questions about her qualifications.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss Katie Zacharia's controversial claim about passing a bar exam in China, but they describe different timeframes and outcomes (her firing vs. her appointment).”
Global News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 21% hedged 4 of 19 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A discusses scrutiny over Katie Zacharia's background after her debut, while Article B focuses on her firing and doubts about her legal qualifications.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 2 of 21 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A focuses on Katie Zacharia defending her legal credentials after failing the California bar exam, while Article B discusses her firing and describes a more general pattern of behavior by women in President Trump's administration.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
46
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
6 of 46 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 3920 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jacqueline Maley
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 She took only three questions, and couldn’t answer the most pressing inquiry – whether the United States has suspended intelligence-sharing with Ukraine.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

China FBI Fox News White House the New York Times

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 12× Zacharia PERSON · 11× China GPE · 3× Guilfoyle PERSON · 3× FBI ORG · 2× Fox News ORG · 2× Homan PERSON · 2× White House ORG · 2× the New York Times ORG · 2× the Wall Street Journal ORG · 2×

Narrative

The Telegraph sniffed about Zacharia’s “flat Miss America semi-finalist cadence”, and said she hid behind her “impressive mane of blonde hair”. Such criticism of a woman’s appearance is usually denounced by feminists such as myself, especially now we have copious real-world experience of the vitriol and physical risk faced by women in the public eye.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-16
🔮 She took only three questions, and couldn’t answer the most pressing inquiry – whether the United States has suspended intelligence-sharing with Ukraine.
2026-10-16 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Why all the president’s women are looks-maxxed, blonde, and more likely to be fired · assertive framing

Claims (46 extracted, 6 hedged)

The now-former White House press secretary Katie Zacharia, who was sacked on Saturday after just five days in the job, was described by herself and her boss, United States President Donald Trump, as a lawyer. asserted
who → sack → lawyer
When asked by reporters this week in which state she passed the bar exam, Zacharia replied: “When I moved to China”. asserted
I → ask → China
Media outlets such as the New York Times later reported that Zacharia had graduated with a law degree from Pepperdine University, a Californian Christian college, but had not been admitted to practise law in any state. asserted
Zacharia → report → state
According to the Wall Street Journal, she sat the California bar exam after graduating, but did not pass. uncertain
she → accord → exam
Zacharia later admitted that was the case. asserted
that → admit → ?
Zacharia says she worked on “international transaction law” during a stint in China, but it seems unlikely she practised law there – China doesn’t generally allow foreigners accreditation in its jurisdiction. asserted
China → say → jurisdiction
The focus on Zacharia’s credentials, and her apparent embellishment of them, came after she gave her first press briefing, which was amateurish in the extreme. asserted
which → come → extreme
She opened with a gushing monologue about how honoured she was to work for Trump. asserted
she → open → Trump
“I have wanted to work for him for a very long time,” she told the White House press corps. asserted
she → want → corps
She took only three questions, and couldn’t answer the most pressing inquiry – whether the United States has suspended intelligence-sharing with Ukraine. asserted
States → take → Ukraine
Zacharia’s predecessor Karoline Leavitt was an excellent performer but, overall, it is difficult to mount the case that the Trump administration is a meritocracy. asserted
administration → mount → case
It is stacked with sycophants, shucksters, nepo-babies and former TV hosts (Zacharia was previously a commentator for Fox News). asserted
Zacharia → stack → News
The self-styled Secretary for War Pete Hegseth (a former Fox News host) presided over “Signalgate”, where a journalist – The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg – was accidentally added to a group-chat where sensitive, classified details about US military airstrikes were shared. asserted
details → style → airstrikes
FBI Director Kash Patel is the subject of much scrutiny over reported heavy drinking and erratic behaviour on the job, and Trump’s hand-picked “Border Czar” Tom Homan was caught on audio in 2024 literally accepting cash in a plastic bag – $50,000 of it. asserted
Czar → report → it
The FBI sting was shut down by the Trump administration, according to the New York Times. uncertain
sting → shut → Times
Homan remains in his job, as do the other men of his administration who have self-dealt and stuffed up while working, ostensibly, for the American taxpayer. asserted
who → remain → taxpayer
Trump, who became famous for his TV catchphrase – “You’re fired!” – seems to only terminate the employment of his female appointees. asserted
You → become → appointees
Zacharia is not the only one to get sacked this week. asserted
Zacharia → sack → ?
The now-former US Ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle, also fell victim to the Trump-woman curse when she was dumped via Zacharia’s first press briefing (the only informative news to emerge from it). asserted
she → fall → it
Guilfoyle, a Trump loyalist who was long-time engaged to Trump’s eldest son, Donald Junior, had become an embarrassment. asserted
who → become → son
She was given the posting immediately after her fiancé was caught canoodling with a younger woman, soon after which their engagement was broken off. asserted
engagement → give → which
Guilfoyle may have been spurned, but she made hay with her consolation prize. uncertain
she → spurn → prize
She used the Greek post, it seems, to party hard and shamelessly hustle for cash – the final straw for Trump was the publication by the Wall Street Journal of texts where she tells a Trump donor whom she called “honey” to pay off her $100,000 credit card bill, apparently in return for favours. asserted
she → use → favours
Zacharia and Guilfoyle join former attorney-general Pam Bondi, Labour secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, homeland secretary Kristi Noem and national intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard as the latest woman to be jettisoned by Trump. asserted
Zacharia → join → Trump
All have been replaced by men. asserted
All → replace → men
(Zacharia’s replacement hasn’t been announced yet.) asserted
replacement → announce → ?
It’s no wonder Zacharia was so anxious on her first day. asserted
Zacharia → ’ → day
She seems to have had almost no preparation and little notice of her appointment. asserted
She → seem → appointment
And her nerves would not have been improved by reading the subsequent media critiques, many of them unflattering and some focused on her looks. asserted
some → improve → looks
The Times of London headlined their story, “Another Maga Blonde Bombshell”. asserted
Times → headline → story
Its author, a woman, wrote of Zacharia that it was “hard to get over how she looks, with her to-the-tits golden hair, transfixingly white teeth and notably plumped and sculpted lips and cheeks”. asserted
she → write → hair
The Telegraph sniffed about Zacharia’s “flat Miss America semi-finalist cadence”, and said she hid behind her “impressive mane of blonde hair”. Such criticism of a woman’s appearance is usually denounced by feminists such as myself, especially now we have copious real-world experience of the vitriol and physical risk faced by women in the public eye. asserted
we → sniff → eye
In Australia, as in the United States, female politicians and officials face disproportionate and sexualised abuse, often based on their appearance. asserted
politicians → face → appearance
Such abuse tends to divide into one of two lanes – the woman is either ugly and unf---able, or the opposite, and therefore a “whore”. asserted
woman → tend → lanes
But in the case of the Trump administration, the well-founded reluctance to comment on women’s appearance presents a dilemma because it is hard to observe the women of Trump’s circle without observing the way they look. asserted
they → found → way
And the way they look is a part of the broader story of government-by-MAGA. asserted
they → look → MAGA
Except for the non-public-facing White House chief of staff Susie Wiles (also subject to imminent-sacking rumours), who looks like a normal 69-year-old, the women of the Trump administration are all looks-maxxed versions of a heightened feminine aesthetic that owes much to our beloved Barbie. asserted
that → look → Barbie
They are cosmetically enhanced, heavily made-up and usually blonde. asserted
They → enhance → ?
Trump’s MAGA movement overlaps generously with the gender-fascism and misogyny of the manosphere. asserted
movement → overlap → manosphere
In that context, perhaps this hyper-feminised Trump-woman look – the emphasis on the feminine parts of one’s appearance, from the eyelashes and lips to the bust – is an aesthetic apology for being a woman who wields power. asserted
who → wield → power
…and 6 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support