Photo via New York Post

Sure, California voters overwhelmingly backed Democrats. But they refused to punish success.

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

CA Post Editorial Board. (2026, November 5). Sure, California voters overwhelmingly backed Democrats. But they refused to punish success. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/04/opinion/california-voters-backed-democrats-but-they-refused-to-punish-success/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-05 · by CA Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

California voters rejected Proposition 40, a wealth tax targeting the state’s richest residents, on Election Day. The proposition, which aimed to take 5% of the assets from the wealthiest Californians, was defeated despite support from high-profile figures like Bernie Sanders and Ro Khanna. Dave Regan, president of SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, spent $47 million advocating for Proposition 40 but failed due to concerns that it would drive away entrepreneurs and investors. Texas billionaire Mark Cuban warned that such a tax could prompt companies to relocate. The article highlights California voters' pragmatic approach in protecting economic opportunities rather than punishing success.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

California voters rejected Proposition 40 on November 3, 2026, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires with fortunes over $1 billion. The measure faced strong opposition from billionaire tech leaders and others who argued it would harm job creation and economic growth. Despite support from progressive figures like Senator Bernie Sanders and the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Prop 40 lost, marking a significant setback for efforts to address wealth inequality through direct taxation of the ultra-rich. The initiative had divided liberal leaders nationally and sparked one of California's most expensive ballot fights, with opponents pouring over $300 million into campaigns against it.

Written for “California Billionaire Tax Referendum” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 California Billionaire Tax Referendum
Economy/Business · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different outcomes for Proposition 40; Article A implies support, while Article B states it was rejected.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 29 claims Outlet record 77/100
“The articles refer to different aspects of Proposition 40: one is about the initial proposal and debate, while the other reports on its outcome in the election.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 5 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of California's political and economic situation without clearly describing the same specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 6 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Proposition 40, Article A focuses on economists opposing it through a letter, while Article B discusses the outcome of the election where voters rejected the proposition.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 8 of 56 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the proposed wealth tax in California; Article A focuses on billionaires fleeing and economists' warnings, while Article B discusses voter rejection of Proposition 40 during an election.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 17225 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

CA Post Editorial Board
76 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Silicon Valley Rep. Ro Khanna, who is almost certain to run for the Democratic presidential nomination, also fought for Proposition 40 — even though it would punish the biggest job creators in his own district.
🔮 Becerra never told voters what he would do differently from the outgoing governor.
🔮 Inside Xavier Becerra’s secretive inner circle as Dem insiders jockey for plum gigs — before votes are even counted - From the billionaire tax to voter ID, here are the 14 measures Californians will decide in November - How California could track your miles — and what drivers might pay -
🔮 Lower courts last month had declined to order the ballots set aside so that those voters’ eligibility could be double-checked before the votes were counted.
🔮 It could also boost oil and gas production right here in California, creating jobs, lowering energy prices and producing cleaner fuel than would be produced anywhere else in the world.
🔮 Sanders’ real goal is to introduce a nationwide billionaire tax, which would chase entrepreneurs offshore — a disaster for America.
🔮 This year, it might be tempting to think that your vote matters even less.
🔮 Good: Admitting the need for change — obvious though it may be — is the first step toward a safer, stronger, more livable LA.
🔮 It might just work, because Becerra may think he has an excuse to continue funding it, under new leadership.
🔮 Even former Obama administration staffers were appalled that he might move ahead to the general election.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by CA Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 76 articles by CA Post Editorial Board →

Topics

California Californians Proposition 40 SEIU The California Post

Subjects

California GPE · 10× Dave Regan PERSON · 2× Bernie Sanders PERSON · 1× Californians NORP · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Regan PERSON · 1× Ro Khanna PERSON · 1× SEIU ORG · 1× The California Post ORG · 1× Vermont GPE · 1×

Narrative

Silicon Valley Rep. Ro Khanna, who is almost certain to run for the Democratic presidential nomination, also fought for Proposition 40 — even though it would punish the biggest job creators in his own district.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 Silicon Valley Rep. Ro Khanna, who is almost certain to run for the Democratic presidential nomination, also fought for Proposition 40 — even though it would punish the biggest job creators in his own district.

Claims (24 extracted, 0 hedged)

California voters showed their pragmatic side on Election Day by rejecting Proposition 40, the so-called “billionaire tax.” asserted
voters → show → Proposition
The tax was an attempt to seize 5% of the wealth of the richest Californians. asserted
tax → seize → Californians
It was pushed by SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West president Dave Regan, in a naked cash grab to help his union’s members. asserted
It → push → members
Regan, named by The California Post as the “biggest election loser” in the state, blew $47 million on Proposition 40 and another failed ballot measure that was designed to intimidate community health clinics. asserted
that → name → clinics
But the billionaire tax had some big-name supporters. asserted
tax → have → supporters
Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont campaigned hard for the wealth tax, which he wants to impose nationwide as well. asserted
he → campaign → which
Silicon Valley Rep. Ro Khanna, who is almost certain to run for the Democratic presidential nomination, also fought for Proposition 40 — even though it would punish the biggest job creators in his own district. asserted
it → run → district
Luckily, California voters saw right through it. asserted
voters → see → it
They understood that the billionaire tax was driving California’s entrepreneurs to leave. asserted
tax → understand → entrepreneurs
They knew that it would keep investors away from California companies. asserted
it → know → companies
They heard the warnings of Texas billionaire — and Democrat — Mark Cuban: “You can bet if I’m investing in a multibillion-dollar startup, I’m asking them to move from California first.” asserted
I → hear → California
Voters got the message. asserted
Voters → get → message
Supporters of Proposition 40 complained about the hundreds of millions of dollars that Google co-founder Sergey Brin spent to oppose the measure. asserted
Brin → complain → measure
If only Brin had put that money toward a useful cause, they said. asserted
they → put → cause
That’s the problem in California: Rich and poor alike have to waste money and time just protecting what’s theirs from a greedy state and special-interest bullies like Dave Regan. asserted
what → ’ → Regan
But common sense prevailed, as it so often does. asserted
it → prevail → ?
In 2020, the same voters that chose Joe Biden 2-to-1 over Donald Trump also voted to protect Proposition 209, California’s race-neutral policy on college admissions. asserted
that → choose → admissions
Even in a “blue wave,” California voters know there are limits. asserted
voters → know → wave
They want to make sure this beautiful state is still the best place to launch an idea. asserted
state → want → idea
You can’t keep that going if you punish success. asserted
you → keep → success
This was never about protecting a few rich “tech bros.” asserted
This → protect → bros
It was about protecting the tens of thousands of people who still come to California looking to build the next unicorn. asserted
who → protect → unicorn
It was about saving the California dream. asserted
It → save → dream
No matter how you feel about Democrats’ victory, you have to feel good about that. asserted
you → feel → that
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support