In the lead-up to the November midterms, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) put its support behind California’s Proposition 40, a measure that would impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires in the state.
asserted
that → put → state
Although the secretary of state's election results show it on the path to defeat as of Wednesday afternoon, the DSA’s support for the policy has created a flashpoint for larger discussions about socialism's redistributive aims and the capital flight critics say could follow.
uncertain
critics → show → aims
"In their mind, every tax they do is some attempt to get money from people who create wealth and move it to the state," Richard Stern, an economics scholar with Advancing American Freedom (AAF), said in an interview with Fox News Digital.
asserted
Stern → do → Digital
The DSA's stance on Proposition 40 has also brought it into conflict with other Democratic figures, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, who opposed it.
asserted
who → bring → it
The proposition would have applied a 5% tax on assets like businesses, securities, art, collectibles and intellectual property while excluding select pensions, real estate and retirement accounts.
asserted
proposition → apply → pensions
To prevent billionaires from simply leaving the state, Proposition 40 was designed to retroactively apply to billionaires who were residents of California on Jan. 1, 2026.
asserted
who → prevent → Jan.
On the website for its California chapter, the group offered a PowerPoint slideshow supporters could use to argue its merits.
uncertain
supporters → offer → merits
"We have the money in California to pay for the quality schools and healthcare that we need.
asserted
we → have → that
It just needs to be transferred from the wrong pockets to the right ones.
asserted
It → need → ones
We can do that by taxing the rich," the slideshow reads.
asserted
slideshow → do → rich
The DSA argued the policy would help cover up to a projected $100 billion shortfall in federal funding for the state’s Medi-Cal program that provides health insurance for low-income individuals, seniors and people with disabilities.
asserted
that → argue → disabilities
The proposition also outlined that 90% of the generated revenue would go to healthcare, while the remaining 10% would be set aside for education, food assistance and administration of the tax.
asserted
% → outline → tax
As part of its argument in favor of the policy, the DSA framed it as a scaled-up version of something that already exists: a progressive tax, a kind of tax that scales relative to income.
asserted
that → frame → income
"It calls for a temporary 5% wealth tax on just 250 Californians — the very richest people in the state — who together own $2 trillion in wealth," its materials explain.
asserted
materials → call → wealth
"Let’s be clear: if the Billionaire Tax passes, none of the billionaires will actually lose money.
asserted
none → pass → money
They have been averaging a growth rate of 7 or 8 percent per year in their wealth.
asserted
They → average → wealth
Thus, a 5% hit doesn’t even cut into what they have; it just slightly slows down the growth of that wealth.
asserted
it → cut → wealth
"
But to experts like Stern, the AAF economist, the policy reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of wealth.
asserted
policy → reflect → wealth
"The left looks at a billionaire, and they assume that they’re sitting on $10 billion, $100 billion in cash.
asserted
they → look → cash
I hate to break it to them: There’s no cash," Stern said.
asserted
Stern → hate → them
"They have no idea that we’re talking about a trillion-dollar company, we’re talking about a trillion dollars’ worth of factories and warehouses and delivery trucks and machinery.
asserted
we → have → factories
Notably, Newsom has said he is opposed to the measure, arguing it would put California at a competitive disadvantage.
In an interview with Fox News Digital, Newsom cited opposition from a number of different groups.
"The firefighters opposed it.
asserted
firefighters → say → it
The teachers opposed it.
asserted
teachers → oppose → it
Planned Parenthood opposed it.
asserted
Parenthood → oppose → it
The vast majority of labor opposes it.
asserted
majority → oppose → it
I think the majority of Californians oppose it.
asserted
majority → think → it
So, we all have our reasons why," Newsom said ahead of the election.
asserted
Newsom → have → election
"I don’t think it’s a good idea to do [it] at a state level.
asserted
it → think → level
It’s a badly written initiative.
asserted
It → ’ → ?
It focuses just on one part of the state’s budget.
asserted
It → focus → budget
It’s one-time money and the impact is already being felt.
asserted
impact → ’ → ?
People have left the state.
asserted
People → leave → state
"
Instead, Newsom called on voters to adopt a poison pill countermeasure.
asserted
Newsom → call → countermeasure
Proposition 42 was designed to prohibit new state taxes on personal property and restrict certain retroactive taxes.
asserted
Proposition → design → taxes
That measure looks to be on track to succeed.
asserted
measure → look → track
Even so, Newsom noted that his views on a 5% tax might change if implemented at the federal level.
uncertain
views → note → level
I think the majority of Californians see that distinction even though they absolutely believe that we need a new tax bracket in this country," Newsom said.
asserted
Newsom → think → country
Stern noted that Newsom’s openness to considering such a policy nationally comes with many of the same difficulties, but on an international scale.
asserted
openness → note → scale
"You can more easily leave California, but you could give up American citizenship and move abroad," Stern said.
uncertain
Stern → leave → citizenship
"[It] gets back to the old half-joke about communism and the wall in Berlin, which is, as Reagan said, they build walls that keep people in where normally we build walls to keep people out.
asserted
we → get → people
…and 2 more, not listed.
The Aporia
