Photo via Washington Examiner

Alito highlights Colorado’s poor Supreme Court record during Catholic preschool case

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Birle, J. (2026, November 4). Alito highlights Colorado’s poor Supreme Court record during Catholic preschool case. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/4790007/samuel-alito-colorado-poor-supreme-court-record-catholic-preschool-case/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-04 · by Jack Birle

Quick Summary

During a Supreme Court hearing for St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, Justice Samuel Alito pointed out Colorado’s weak track record regarding First Amendment cases over the past decade. The case involves Colorado's decision to exclude Catholic preschools from its universal preschool program due to the schools' refusal to admit all children regardless of their families’ religious beliefs. This exclusion is challenged by Catholic schools on grounds that it infringes upon their First Amendment rights to freely exercise their religion without state interference.
Written by AI on 2026-11-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On November 1, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court heard a case involving St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, where Colorado's refusal to include religious schools in its universal preschool program was challenged by Catholic institutions and families. The case centers around whether religious schools can exclude students from LGBTQ+ families without violating state anti-discrimination laws. Erika Nagle, a mother of three whose children attend St. Mary Catholic School in Littleton, Colorado, claims her family was denied $12,000 in taxpayer-funded preschool benefits because she chose a Catholic education for her children. The program, worth up to $6,300 per child, aims to provide universal access but includes conditions that religious schools find discriminatory. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it could allow more public funds to flow to religious schools despite state nondiscrimination policies.

Written for “Supreme Court Hearing Catholic Preschool Case” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 17 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.15, but all 1 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 127032: attributed speech only · logged 2026-11-04

Story

📰 Supreme Court Hearing Catholic Preschool Case
Politics · 18 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 69/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 69/100
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 65/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 69/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
NPR
Hedges 4 of 51 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
4
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 4 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
18
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4074 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jack Birle
39 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The coalition of Catholic schools argued that asking them to admit families who do not follow Catholic teachings would sacrifice their beliefs, which they say violates their First Amendment rights.
🔮 The coalition of Catholic schools argued that asking them to admit families who do not follow Catholic teachings would sacrifice their beliefs, which they say violates their First Amendment rights.
🔮 The coalition of Catholic schools argued that asking them to admit families who do not follow Catholic teachings would sacrifice their beliefs, which they say violates their First Amendment rights.
🔮 In Gwinnett and Cobb counties, officials have said they will contact voters who have not received the absentee ballots they requested after a pair of lawsuits in the past week claimed that nearly 5,000 residents in both counties did not receive their requested absentee ballots.
🔮 The high court began its November sitting on Monday with oral arguments in Maxwell v. Dinis over whether William Maxwell, who is serving a sentence in a low-security prison in Texas for his role in organized crime and taking over a mortgage-loan company, can file a habeas corpus challenge to be transferred to a halfway house or home confinement under the First Step Act.
🔮 As same-day voters go to the polls for the midterm elections next week, the Supreme Court will hear a major religious liberty case over a Colorado universal preschool program with implications beyond the Centennial State.
🔮 A trio of cases involving property rights and personal freedoms set to be argued this term illustrates the role of the Supreme Court as the last line of defense for people fighting what they see as government overreach.
🔮 The Supreme Court will hear a pair of cases over the legality of sweeping “assault weapons” bans later this year, and the local governments at the center of the lawsuits are urging the high court this week to let them ban the firearms they claim are responsible for the “most tragic and frightening crimes.”
🔮 The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a loss on its emergency docket on Wednesday, declining to lift a lower court’s block on a new regulation for federal prisons that would stop providing inmates with transgender surgeries and procedures.
🔮 The high court announced in an order list that because they lacked a quorum in BMG Rights Management v. Vetter, the lower court’s ruling would be affirmed as if the justices never took up the case, the same way that a deadlock at the Supreme Court would affirm a lower court’s ruling.
Also by Jack Birle
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 39 articles by Jack Birle →

Topics

Catholic Colorado First Amendment St. Mary Catholic Parish v. the Supreme Court

Subjects

Catholic NORP · 5× Colorado GPE · 2× the Supreme Court ORG · 2× Roy PERSON · 1× Samuel Alito PERSON · 1× St. Mary Catholic Parish v. ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, a case involving the state’s decision to bar Catholic preschools from its universal preschool programs because they refuse to comply with standards requiring schools to admit any child.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-04
🔮 The coalition of Catholic schools argued that asking them to admit families who do not follow Catholic teachings would sacrifice their beliefs, which they say violates their First Amendment rights.

Claims (4 extracted, 0 hedged)

Justice Samuel Alito highlighted Colorado’s dismal record at the Supreme Court in the past decade on First Amendment issues when questioning the state’s requirements for its universal preschool program, which the state says must exclude Catholic schools. asserted
state → highlight → schools
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, a case involving the state’s decision to bar Catholic preschools from its universal preschool programs because they refuse to comply with standards requiring schools to admit any child. asserted
they → hear → child
Colorado defended its decision because it required the Catholic preschools to accept all families, including those who do not share Catholic beliefs, to be part of the state program. asserted
who → defend → program
The coalition of Catholic schools argued that asking them to admit families who do not follow Catholic teachings would sacrifice their beliefs, which they say violates their First Amendment rights. asserted
they → argue → rights
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support