Photo via The Guardian

How you (yes you) can fight dark money in elections | Judd Legum

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Legum, J. (2026, November 2). How you (yes you) can fight dark money in elections | Judd Legum. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/02/how-you-yes-you-can-fight-dark-money-in-elections

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-02 · by Judd Legum

Quick Summary

Judd Legum discusses how an influx of dark money is influencing the 2026 midterms in the United States, with spending expected to exceed $8.9 billion from previous elections. He highlights that nearly $1.3 billion has already been spent on undisclosed donations, primarily by tech billionaires and corporate interests through Super PACs. Legum argues this makes it difficult for voters to distinguish between accurate and misleading information.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 2026, an unprecedented surge in election spending, fueled by tech billionaires and corporate interests, is influencing the US midterm elections. Spending on federal elections has risen from $3.8 billion in the 2014 midterms to $8.9 billion in 2022, with this year expected to surpass that mark. A significant portion of this funding, estimated at a minimum of $1.3 billion, comes from "dark money" sources where donor identities are not disclosed. This opaque funding is impacting voter perceptions and could shape the composition of Congress, posing a threat to democracy according to Judd Legum's analysis for The Guardian. Academic studies suggest that attack ads from outside groups lose effectiveness when voters learn about their undisclosed donors, highlighting a potential strategy for combating dark money influence.

Written for “Fighting Dark Money In Elections” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 123447 (high confidence, 5 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Fighting Dark Money In Elections
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Intercept
Hedges 11 of 197 claims Outlet record 97/100
“The articles discuss similar topics related to money in politics during midterms but describe different specific events or analyses.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 49 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss similar themes about dark money in midterms but describe different aspects and perspectives; Article A provides an overview, while Article B offers advice on fighting it.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the release of ads accusing Republican candidates of protecting Epstein, while Article B discusses broader issues of dark money in elections with a brief mention of Epstein files. They are not describing the same specific event.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
52
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
4 of 52 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1929 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Judd Legum
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Without question, the billions of dollars in dark money will influence the composition of the next Congress, and Super Pac spending profoundly impacts a race, beyond possibly shifting votes.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

America Guardian Republican Senate WinSenate

Subjects

Epstein PERSON · 3× Congress ORG · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Senate ORG · 2× Washington ORG · 2× WinSenate ORG · 2× America GPE · 1× Guardian ORG · 1× Judd Legum PERSON · 1× Katie Phang PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Multiple academic studies conducted over the last 15 years have found that attack ads from outside groups become meaningfully less effective after voters are provided with information about the donors behind the ads.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 Without question, the billions of dollars in dark money will influence the composition of the next Congress, and Super Pac spending profoundly impacts a race, beyond possibly shifting votes.
2026-11-02 · The Guardian
How you (yes you) can fight dark money in elections | Judd Legum · assertive framing

Claims (52 extracted, 4 hedged)

Welcome back to How We Win, a Guardian opinion series with leading thinkers, offering bold ideas for America’s political future. asserted
We → welcome → future
Last week, Katie Phang argued that the Epstein files are a midterms sledgehammer. asserted
files → argue → ?
Today’s edition was written by Judd Legum, the founder and author of Popular Information. asserted
edition → write → Information
An unprecedented influx of cash from tech billionaires and corporate interests have been injected into the midterms to sway the election. asserted
influx → inject → election
With the fate of US democracy hanging in the balance, millions of Americans have faced a cacophony of provocative – and often inaccurate – messages precisely calibrated to shift their preferences. asserted
millions → hang → preferences
Right now, it is next to impossible for the average voter to sort through the noise. asserted
voter → sort → noise
Overall, spending on federal elections in the United States has exploded in recent years – rising from $3.8bn in the 2014 midterm elections to $8.9bn in 2022. asserted
spending → explode → 2022
This year’s congressional midterms are on pace to break that record. asserted
midterms → break → record
A growing amount of this spending is so-called dark money, funds where the donor legally does not have to be disclosed. asserted
donor → grow → spending
Last month, the Brennan Center estimated, conservatively, that $1.3bn in dark money had already been deployed in the 2026 midterms, more than twice the amount spent through election day during the 2022 midterms. asserted
1.3bn → estimate → midterms
Even when the donor is publicly disclosed, the money is routed through a vaguely named group, and few voters have the time or inclination to look up who funds it. asserted
who → disclose → it
Much of the dark and functionally dark money has come from Super Pacs funded by billionaires, including Elon Musk and Jeff Yass, and corporate interests, particularly the AI and crypto industries. asserted
Much → come → Musk
In 2026, Super Pacs have flooded the airwaves, mailboxes and the internet with false and misleading advertisements. asserted
Pacs → flood → advertisements
For example, the false claim (or implication) that Senate candidate James Talarico in Texas supported “taxpayer-funded sex change surgeries on kids”, Senate candidate Roy Cooper released a murderer from prison, or gubernatorial candidate Amy Acton is an alcoholic. uncertain
Acton → support → prison
(It was Vivek Ramaswamy’s own campaign that did the now infamous ad against Acton, featuring her estranged mother.) asserted
that → do → mother
Although about 60% of dark money spent this cycle has benefited Republicans, and Republican-aligned groups are responsible for many of the most outrageous claims, it is a bipartisan problem. uncertain
it → spend → claims
A Democratic Super Pac called WinSenate claimed “Jeffrey Epstein’s business partner funneled $3 million” to a Pac supporting the Republican Maine Susan Collins. asserted
partner → call → Collins
PolitiFact rated the ad false. asserted
PolitiFact → rat → ad
WinSenate receives much of its funding from billionaires, via another Super Pac, Senate Majority Pac. asserted
WinSenate → receive → Pac
Without question, the billions of dollars in dark money will influence the composition of the next Congress, and Super Pac spending profoundly impacts a race, beyond possibly shifting votes. uncertain
spending → influence → votes
Campaigns are forced to respond, even when an attack has no factual basis. asserted
attack → force → basis
To counter pricey TV ads, candidates are diverted from voter events to fundraising functions. asserted
candidates → counter → functions
With a limited pool of money, parties and outside groups divert resources from other races. asserted
parties → divert → races
We don’t have to accept the world as it is. asserted
it → have → world
There are several ways we can combat dark money, as the balance of power shifts in Washington. asserted
balance → be → Washington
We don’t have to accept the world as it is. asserted
it → have → world
There are several ways we can combat dark money, as the balance of power shifts in Washington. asserted
balance → be → Washington
The first is to limit the amount of money billionaires and corporations can spend on elections. asserted
billionaires → limit → elections
This has been tried, in fits and starts, since the 1970s. asserted
This → try → 1970s
But efforts to restrict such spending have generally been invalidated by the courts. asserted
efforts → restrict → courts
After Congress banned “soft money” – unlimited donations to political parties from corporations, unions and wealthy individuals – the cash was simply diverted to other entities, including Super Pacs. asserted
cash → ban → Pacs
The second tactic would be to reduce the effectiveness of dark money. asserted
tactic → reduce → money
Multiple academic studies conducted over the last 15 years have found that attack ads from outside groups become meaningfully less effective after voters are provided with information about the donors behind the ads. asserted
voters → conduct → ads
In other words, requiring Super Pacs and other groups to disclose the top donors to their advertisements would blunt their impact. asserted
requiring → require → impact
Right now, Elon Musk is spending tens of millions of dollars on misleading attack ads that are “Paid for by America Pac”. asserted
that → spend → Pac
If those advertisements were required to disclose that virtually all of America Pac’s money comes from Musk, voters would view them much differently. asserted
voters → require → them
Notably, the courts have upheld the constitutionality of increased disclosure requirements. asserted
courts → uphold → requirements
In 2024, the United States court of appeals for the ninth circuit upheld Alaska’s requirement to include donor information on advertisements related to state campaigns. asserted
court → uphold → campaigns
The supreme court declined to hear the case. asserted
court → decline → case
Making donor disclosure requirements meaningful would require closing a few loopholes. asserted
requirements → make → loopholes
…and 12 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support