Photo via The Guardian

Ads accusing Republican candidates of protecting Epstein fill airwaves in final midterm push

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Baio, A. (2026, October 31). Ads accusing Republican candidates of protecting Epstein fill airwaves in final midterm push. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/31/political-ads-midterms-epstein-republican-candidate

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-31 · by Ariana Baio
Content note This article describes abuse of a child.

Quick Summary

Democratic candidates and groups are airing ads in several states accusing Republican opponents of protecting Epstein, a convicted sex offender. These ads aim to stir voter emotions by claiming that Republicans such as Jeff Crank in Colorado and Ashley Hinson in Iowa have blocked the release of documents related to Epstein’s crimes. According to analyses from CNN and the Washington Post, Democrats have spent over $40 million on these advertisements across key Senate races. The Republican candidates are defending their positions, with some accusing the opposition of exploiting sensitive issues for political gain.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In the final push before the 2026 midterms, Democratic candidates and their supporters have released ads accusing Republican candidates of protecting Jeffrey Epstein by voting against legislation to release files related to him. These ads aim to evoke an emotional response among voters. According to CNN and the Washington Post, Democrats spent over $35 million and $40 million respectively on such ads across key Senate races.

In Colorado, ads target Republican candidate Jeff Crank for voting against releasing the Epstein files, with Virginia Giuffre’s family members claiming he “covered up Epstein’s crimes” to protect Donald Trump. Similarly, in Iowa, Ashley Hinson was accused of voting to "protect her donors" by refusing to support file release legislation.

These ads highlight how issues related to Epstein continue to influence political campaigns despite the passage of time since his death and conviction.

Written for “Ads Attack Republican Candidates Over Epstein” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 119795 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Ads Attack Republican Candidates Over Epstein
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 13 of 43 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of a broader political campaign strategy regarding Epstein, not the same specific incident.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 7 of 101 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles describe different political advertisements in separate contexts and states.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 30 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes Trump's speech about Jeffrey Epstein during a campaign stop, while Article B discusses ads targeting Republican candidates for their alleged protection of Epstein.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 2 of 12 claims
“Article A discusses specific new allegations against Trump and evidence related to Epstein, while Article B covers a broader trend of Democratic ads accusing Republicans of protecting Epstein in various races across the country.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 50 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the broader political context of the Jeffrey Epstein files in relation to US midterm elections, while Article B focuses specifically on the ads released by Democratic candidates and groups accusing Republicans of protecting Epstein. Although related, these articles describe different aspects of the same issue.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
3 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1867 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ariana Baio
36 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A spokesperson for Crank’s campaign accused the Epstein-related ad of being “intentionally vague”, in a statement to the Washington Post, because his position was that he would vote against the file’s release until he could be confident that victim information was properly redacted.
🔮 man named Dan J Sullivan entered the Alaska Senate race as a Republican in May, challenging incumbent Republican Dan S Sullivan and Democrat Mary Peltola.
🔮 Peltola’s campaign had denied involvement in encouraging or soliciting Dan J Sullivan, a former educator with no political experience, to run against Dan S Sullivan, according to an Anchorage Daily News report from May.
🔮 In March, McMahon – who is seeking to permanently shutter the Department of Education – announced the department would relocate from its headquarters in the Lyndon B Johnson building to a smaller building in downtown Washington DC, which housed the US Agency for International Development (USAID) before the Trump administration closed it down.
🔮 The new memo, seen by CNN, states that the DHS will be solely responsible for the system’s “employment, use and development of tactics, techniques and procedures”.
🔮 Neil Bush said he sees Talarico as “a principled, pragmatic leader” who has a “willingness to listen to those with whom he disagrees”.
🔮 The new press secretary declined to explain why she took just three questions, but said going forward she would be “very well prepared on the briefing” and “would love, and do love, questions”.
🔮 The notice said law enforcement officials were working to intercept additional mail, but it is possible some could reach their destination.
🔮 Jodi Hunt, a self-described single-issue voter, probed Talarico’s pro-choice stance, asking: “How would you convince me as a Catholic voter that I can trust you would protect the most innocent among us?”
🔮 Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the leader of the New York City council have agreed to ban horse-drawn carriages from the city, a popular tourist attraction that has faced widespread scrutiny.
2026-10-14 · assertive framing · New York City moves to ban horse-drawn carriages
Also by Ariana Baio
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 36 articles by Ariana Baio →

Topics

Democrats House Republican Republicans Senate

Subjects

Epstein PERSON · 17× Crank PERSON · 5× House ORG · 5× Republican NORP · 5× Republicans NORP · 5× Democrats NORP · 3× Hinson PERSON · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Democratic NORP · 2×

Narrative

Melissa Stone, a spokesperson for Patronis’s campaign, highlighted his work with Trump to obtain disaster funding after Hurricane Isaias and said his opponent, Gay Valimont, was “still talking about a dead pedophile in a sad web video than helping the people of [the first congressional district] recover.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 A spokesperson for Crank’s campaign accused the Epstein-related ad of being “intentionally vague”, in a statement to the Washington Post, because his position was that he would vote against the file’s release until he could be confident that victim information was properly redacted.

Claims (33 extracted, 3 hedged)

In races across the country, Democratic candidates or groups that support them have released ads accusing Republicans of protecting pedophiles by voting against legislation to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. asserted
that → support → Epstein
The ads appear intended to evoke an emotional response by accusing candidates of “protecting” Epstein, a notorious pedophile accused of running a sex-trafficking ring involving minors. asserted
ads → intend → minors
An analysis from CNN found that candidates and outside groups have spent more than $35m on Epstein-related ads. asserted
candidates → find → ads
Another from the Washington Post found that Democrats spent more than $40m on Epstein-related ads across six key Senate races. asserted
Democrats → find → races
In Colorado, ads targeting Republican Jeff Crank note that the lawmaker voted against releasing the Epstein files. asserted
lawmaker → target → files
In one, the family members of Virginia Giuffre, a woman who survived abuse at the hands of Epstein and died by suicide last year, claim Crank “covered up Epstein’s crimes to protect Donald Trump”. uncertain
Crank → survive → Trump
Ashley Hinson, a Senate candidate in Iowa, was accused of voting to “protect her donors” by refusing to vote to release the Epstein files. asserted
Hinson → accuse → files
“This week I had to explain to my boys, ‘No, Mom does not protect pedophiles,’” Hinson said in a campaign ad responding to attacks over the Epstein files. asserted
Hinson → have → files
An ad targeting Mike Collins, the Republican running for a Georgia Senate seat, says “Mike Collins voted against releasing the Epstein files even after he knew Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation exploited 14-year-old girls for sex”. asserted
operation → target → sex
Florida Republican Jimmy Patronis faced an attack from his Democratic opponent, claiming he called investigating Epstein “a waste of his time”. asserted
he → face → time
A spokesperson for Crank’s campaign accused the Epstein-related ad of being “intentionally vague”, in a statement to the Washington Post, because his position was that he would vote against the file’s release until he could be confident that victim information was properly redacted. uncertain
information → accuse → release
The campaign also said it was “unfortunate” that his opponent, Jessica Killin, was “preying on a grieving family with the help of the Washington Democrats”. asserted
opponent → say → Democrats
Crank’s staff invited and met with Giuffre’s family, though Crank himself did not meet with them in person, the New York Times reported. asserted
Times → invite → person
Crank’s campaign also said it offered to meet with Epstein victims before the vote on the legislation. asserted
it → say → legislation
Last year, Democrats and a select few House Republicans tried to force a vote on the Epstein files through a discharge petition – a procedure used in Congress to bypass the traditional steps of legislation and force a vote on the House floor. asserted
Democrats → try → floor
Donald Trump, who knew Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, opposed the discharge petition for the files, reversing his campaign promise to increase government transparency. asserted
who → know → transparency
House Republicans largely aligned themselves with him, prompting anger from high-profile Trump voters. asserted
Republicans → align → voters
Eventually, under pressure from allies, Trump supported the legislation, giving Republican lawmakers the go-ahead to vote for it. asserted
Trump → support → it
All but one House Republican voted for the Epstein Files Transparency Act. asserted
Republican → vote → Act
Many of the ads omit the fact that nearly every House Republican voted to release the Epstein files when the Epstein Files Transparency Act came to the floor, although at that point Trump had agreed to sign the legislation and release the files. asserted
Trump → omit → files
Instead, the ads refer to Republicans opposing early attempts to force the legislation to the floor. asserted
ads → refer → floor
Republicans have pointed to this fact when disputing the attack ads. asserted
Republicans → point → ads
“Of course I voted to release the Epstein files,” Hinson said in a direct-to-camera ad, accusing her opponent, Josh Turek, of lying. asserted
Hinson → vote → opponent
While Hinson voted for the final Epstein Files Transparency Act, she did not sign on to the discharge petition. asserted
she → vote → petition
Patronis, meanwhile, never called the investigation a “waste of time”, but told a local radio station that while he had “no problem getting everything all released”, the issue was a “massive energy and time suck at the end of the day”. asserted
issue → call → day
Melissa Stone, a spokesperson for Patronis’s campaign, highlighted his work with Trump to obtain disaster funding after Hurricane Isaias and said his opponent, Gay Valimont, was “still talking about a dead pedophile in a sad web video than helping the people of [the first congressional district] recover.” asserted
people → highlight → district
Some Republicans and groups supporting the GOP have sought to flip the script, accusing Democrats of taking money from donors who had ties to Epstein. asserted
who → support → Epstein
During a Georgia Senate debate, Collins accused his opponent, Jon Ossoff, of accepting campaign donations from Reid Hoffman, a tech billionaire who had ties to Epstein. asserted
who → accuse → Epstein
Hoffman has said he only knew Epstein through fundraising relationships and regrets it. asserted
he → say → it
“You can claim to fight against the Epstein class, but I’m going to tell you, this call is coming from inside the house and the Epstein class is on stage right now and it’s you,” Collins said. uncertain
Collins → claim → stage
In New Mexico’s gubernatorial race, an outside group released an ad accusing Democratic candidate Deb Haaland of accepting a ride on Epstein’s private jet and taking “tens of thousands of dollars from Epstein businesses” and then “asking for more”. asserted
group → release → more
Haaland did not fly on Epstein’s jet, but did take a flight booked by one of Epstein’s companies in 2014. asserted
Haaland → fly → 2014
Haaland has said she was unaware the chartered flight was owned by an Epstein-owned company. asserted
flight → say → company
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support