Photo via The Bulwark

The Trump Administration Wanted to Remake American Culture. Now Americans Get Their Say.

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
Cite

Hertling, M. (2026, November 2). The Trump Administration Wanted to Remake American Culture. Now Americans Get Their Say. The Bulwark. https://www.thebulwark.com/p/the-trump-administration-wanted-change-american-culture-stephen-miller-education-immigration-constitution-midterms

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Bulwark · collected 2026-11-02 · by Mark Hertling commentary

Quick Summary

In the lead-up to midterm elections, an article discusses how the Trump administration has attempted to reshape American culture through its policies and rhetoric. Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller notably addressed these efforts at an event promoting a Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program, emphasizing opposition to perceived cultural shifts like diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives while pledging to instill patriotism in children. The piece questions the feasibility and depth of such cultural transformation efforts, drawing parallels with other complex organizational changes the author has witnessed firsthand.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In November 2026, Donald Trump hosted an Oval Office event introducing a new Justice Department program called the "Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program," aimed at combating alleged fraud by refugees and immigrants. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, emphasized that these groups were exploiting government benefits meant for American taxpayers. This rhetoric is part of a broader effort by the administration to reshape American culture and politics since 2025, with critics arguing it unfairly targets certain communities and political ideologies. As midterm elections approached, the event highlighted ongoing debates about immigration and government accountability.

Written for “Trump Administration Cultural Policy Debate” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans right for article 122669 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Trump Administration Cultural Policy Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 9 of 64 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of political actions leading up to midterm elections, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
95
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
3 of 95 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Bulwark · 573 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Mark Hertling
13 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 After a disconcerting soliloquy about prison rape and child abuse, Miller promised that “children will be taught to love America, children will be taught to be patriots.
🔮 That is true, but nothing close to the whole truth, and so misleading that I worry it may cause some Americans—including policymakers—to arrive at unrealistic and dangerous conclusions about what kind of threat the Houthis pose to American interests and what American policy toward them should be.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · America’s Other Middle East War
🔮 He repeated his argument: “I am in the process of negotiating Peace in the war between Russia and Ukraine, and don’t want to do anything that will drive, foolishly, Russia away from the bargaining table.
2026-10-20 · assertive framing · Siding With Russia Is a Double Betrayal
🔮 They offered something orders, operational plans, and military briefings could never provide: compassion in the face of unbearable loss.
🔮 It might be good to look at the overlap of these issues.
2026-10-14 · assertive framing · America Is Making Its Own Problems Worse
🔮 The unequivocalness of the president’s prediction—made months into a war he repeatedly said would last only days—set off alarm bells in my head.
🔮 Saudi Arabia also has a separate National Guard that itself represents a substantial ground force, also equipped with some of the best military equipment America and Europe would sell them.
2026-09-23 · assertive framing · Why Saudi Arabia’s Houthi Problem Is Our Problem, Too
🔮 They also examine reports that the Pentagon may be undercounting U.S. military deaths in the Middle East, as well as the growing cost of the Iran war.
🔮 FOR DECADES, THE SECURITY architecture of the Persian Gulf rested on an assumption: When the gravest regional threats emerged, the United States would be the power around which its partners organized.
🔮 Mark explains why Iran and the Houthis appear to have the initiative, why the U.S. is increasingly responding rather than setting the terms of the conflict, and how Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and NATO could become entangled as the war continues to expand.
Also by Mark Hertling
America’s Other Middle East War
2026-10-28 · The Bulwark
Siding With Russia Is a Double Betrayal
2026-10-20 · The Bulwark
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 13 articles by Mark Hertling →

Topics

AMERICANS American Democrat the Justice Department’s the White House

Subjects

Miller PERSON · 3× AMERICANS NORP · 2× American NORP · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Democrat NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Stephen Miller PERSON · 1× communists NORP · 1× the Justice Department’s ORG · 1× the White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

Last week, Donald Trump hosted an event in the Oval Office to introduce the Justice Department’s new “Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program,” and his deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, used the opportunity to distinguish between people he portrayed as exploiting government benefits—namely refugees and immigrants—and the American taxpayers being robbed by them:
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 After a disconcerting soliloquy about prison rape and child abuse, Miller promised that “children will be taught to love America, children will be taught to be patriots.

Claims (95 extracted, 3 hedged)

AS AMERICANS VOTE IN THE MIDTERM elections, arguments about the economy, immigration, national security, and the performance of our elected officials abound. asserted
arguments → vote → officials
But beneath the political debates lies a question that deserves more attention: What kind of country do we aspire to be? asserted
we → lie → country
Last week, Donald Trump hosted an event in the Oval Office to introduce the Justice Department’s new “Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program,” and his deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, used the opportunity to distinguish between people he portrayed as exploiting government benefits—namely refugees and immigrants—and the American taxpayers being robbed by them: asserted
he → host → them
The president is describing . . . a criminal conspiracy where a state knowingly aids and admits fraud that’s funneled into these communities. asserted
that → describe → communities
They then use those funds to fund the Democrat party. asserted
They → use → party
So it’s a self-enrichment scheme that’s being exposed, that is fundamentally a criminal conspiracy. asserted
that → ’ → ?
I first grew suspicious of the administration’s attempts to transform American culture in the spring of 2025, when Miller delivered remarks from the White House “about what President Trump has done to secure our values, our culture and our way of life from the unwavering assault from the radical left and the communists and the Democrat party.” asserted
Trump → grow → left
He went on to decry “the wave of racial discrimination, so called diversity, equity and inclusion policies, that have taken over both public sector and private sector entities,” and promised that “this administration is not going to let our society devolve into communist woke DEI strangulation.” asserted
society → go → strangulation
After a disconcerting soliloquy about prison rape and child abuse, Miller promised that “children will be taught to love America, children will be taught to be patriots. asserted
children → promise → America
Children will be taught civic values for schools that want federal taxpayer funding. asserted
that → teach → funding
For any nation to be successful it cannot teach its children to hate themselves and to hate their country.” asserted
it → teach → country
Miller and the rest of the Trump administration have been explicit about their desire to reshape our society, from what children are taught in schools to how Americans understand equality, national identity, immigration, and patriotism. asserted
Americans → reshape → equality
But I wonder whether they truly understand the complexity of what they are attempting. asserted
they → wonder → what
I’ve commanded military organizations with tens of thousands of soldiers, worked with physicians and hospital executives to transform health care organizations, and taught business leaders struggling to change their companies’ cultures. asserted
I → command → cultures
In almost every instance, the challenge was far more complicated than the leaders initially imagined. asserted
leaders → imagine → instance
Culture is not a policy memorandum, a strategic plan, or a collection of slogans posted. asserted
Culture → post → slogans
It is the accumulation of history—the good and the bad—made up of our shared experiences, traditions, values, and behaviors. asserted
It → make → experiences
It is reflected in what people believe, how they treat one another, what they consider acceptable, and what they are willing to defend. asserted
they → reflect → what
Leaders certainly influence culture, but every individual also shapes it. asserted
individual → influence → it
One of the first lessons leaders learn when attempting to change culture is that authority and influence are not the same thing. asserted
authority → learn → culture
A CEO can change organizational structures, revise policies, replace executives, and change performance standards. asserted
CEO → change → standards
A military commander can issue lawful orders, establish priorities, and enforce discipline. asserted
commander → issue → discipline
But genuine cultural change requires credibility, trust, consistency, and, perhaps most importantly, a willingness among all members of the organization to embrace the values their leaders claim to represent. uncertain
leaders → require → values
A leader’s most powerful tool to change a culture is personal example. asserted
tool → change → culture
People watch what leaders do far more closely than they listen to what leaders say. asserted
leaders → watch → what
When leaders preach integrity but practice deception, demand accountability but refuse to accept responsibility, or insist upon respect while treating others with contempt, their actions overwhelm their words. asserted
actions → preach → words
Changing the culture of a military unit or a company is hard enough. asserted
Changing → change → unit
It is made up not of employees or subordinates but citizens—more than 340 million of them—with different beliefs, religions, traditions, political opinions, and aspirations. asserted
It → make → beliefs
Our government derives its legitimate authority from those citizens, not the other way around. asserted
government → derive → citizens
The president can propose policies, enforce laws, and advocate for his preferred vision for the country. asserted
president → propose → country
But no elected official can legitimately claim exclusive ownership of American culture or determine that citizens who hold different beliefs from him are somehow less American. uncertain
who → elect → him
That’s what makes Miller’s statements worth examining, especially as we approach an election. asserted
we → ’ → election
The issue is not whether American culture should change. asserted
culture → change → ?
It has always changed, and much of our national progress has depended upon that evolution. asserted
much → change → evolution
The more important questions are what values should guide that change, how it should occur, and whether the government’s methods of imposing change respect the constitutional principles that define our republic. asserted
that → guide → republic
Our Founders believed that individuals possessed inherent rights to think, speak, worship, assemble, and pursue their lives without unnecessary government interference. asserted
individuals → believe → interference
Yet Miller revealed that the administration was working to ban certain theories—those he vaguely described as promoting “communist ideology—from even being discussed in schools. asserted
he → reveal → schools
I believe deeply in teaching young Americans to love their country. asserted
I → believe → country
I spent nearly four decades wearing its uniform, and I’ve witnessed extraordinary acts of patriotism from soldiers who understood the sacrifices required to defend it. asserted
who → spend → it
But patriotism cannot be commanded. asserted
patriotism → command → ?
…and 55 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support