Photo via The Bulwark

Inside the Wargaming to Foil Trump’s Election Meddling

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
Cite

Egan, L. (2026, November 2). Inside the Wargaming to Foil Trump’s Election Meddling. The Bulwark. https://www.thebulwark.com/p/inside-the-pro-democracy-groups-wargaming-to-foil-trump-midterm-election-meddling

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Bulwark · collected 2026-11-02 · by Lauren Egan commentary

Quick Summary

The American Civil Liberties Union convened a group of around 250 experts in Philadelphia last April to prepare for potential disruptions to the midterm elections by figures like Donald Trump. Over two and a half days, participants considered twenty-five scenarios involving various forms of interference, ranging from casting doubt on results without evidence to deploying ICE or the National Guard at polling places. They developed state-specific plans and identified key contacts in each scenario, such as state attorneys general or election directors, while also responding to Supreme Court rulings that weakened voting protections.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In April 2026, approximately 250 officials from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) gathered in Philadelphia to strategize against potential electoral interference ahead of the midterm elections. Over two and a half days, they explored twenty-five scenarios ranging from Donald Trump casting doubt on election results without evidence to federal agencies like ICE or the National Guard disrupting voting processes. The group drafted mock press releases and developed advocacy, legal, and organizing plans for various contingencies. ACLU officials noted that while they weren't surprised by recent rulings, they were caught off guard by how quickly Republican-controlled states moved to diminish black voters' electoral power in the South. This underscores the urgency of their work to protect democratic processes.

Written for “Wargaming to Foil Trump's Election Meddling” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Wargaming to Foil Trump's Election Meddling
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Mother Jones
Hedges 13 of 101 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of a broader effort to address election interference; one focuses on actual arrests and actions taken, while the other describes planning sessions to counter such interference.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 89 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one focuses on interviews with voters about their views on extremism and election integrity, while the other discusses a meeting of ACLU leaders planning to counter potential election meddling.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 22 of 122 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects of efforts to prevent and prepare for potential election interference by Trump in the midterm elections, not a single specific incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses Trump's political narrative about election cheating, while Article B describes a strategic meeting held by the ACLU to plan responses to potential election interference. Although both articles relate to similar themes of election security and Trump's influence, they describe different specific events.”
NPR
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 5 of 63 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different preparations and planning sessions held by Democrats and civil rights organizations in response to potential election interference, not the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Bulwark · 584 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Lauren Egan
16 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 For two and a half days, the group walked through twenty-five variations on how Donald Trump and his allies might mess with the midterm elections.
🔮 AS DEMOCRATIC OFFICIALS AND STRATEGISTS mapped out their game plan for the midterms earlier this year, they speculated that the Supreme Court’s ruling gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act—and the ensuing rush to carve up the electoral power of black voters in the South—could help drive black voter turnout.
🔮 The polls were largely correct, and maybe they even underestimated the party’s strength in a few races.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · What a Blowout Dem Win in ’26 Would Mean for ’28
🔮 Democrats Test the Limits of a Blue Wave A recording from The Bulwark’s live video Could Democrats really flip Senate seats in deep-red states like Mississippi, South Carolina, and Florida?
🔮 Today, though, there’s reason to believe that the public’s earlier ambivalence has faded, and that Trump’s corruption is not only breaking through in a big way, but could sway the course of this year’s midterms.
🔮 Lauren talks with Hamilton supporters about why they think Kansas could finally be ready to elect a Democrat to the Senate for the first time in nearly a century, and asks Hamilton how he plans to win over Republicans and voters who remain skeptical of the Democratic Party. Join Bulwark+ to unlock the rest Become a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
2026-10-07 · assertive framing · Republicans Are Panicking Over the Kansas Senate Race
🔮 Prairie Village, Kansas STANDING IN FRONT OF A CROWD of roughly a hundred people on Friday evening, Adam Hamilton didn’t have the aura of a man whose entire life was about to be picked apart, whose political ambitions were set to be battered by millions of dollars of negative TV ads, whose campaign had become a vector of immodest hope for Democrats dreaming of an unfathomably successful midterm election.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Kansas Is in Play. Can Adam Hamilton Keep It That Way?
🔮 AS DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVES brace for the final weeks of the midterm campaign, they’ve been pleased to discover that they may not need to actually get above 50 percent of the vote to win in several key races.
2026-10-01 · assertive framing · Live Free or Die (Helping Dems Get Elected)
🔮 The mission at hand, he would tell them, is like landing a plane in a hurricane.
2026-09-28 · assertive framing · Could a Wave THIS Big Actually Happen?
🔮 WITH JUST OVER SIX WEEKS TO GO until Election Day, things couldn’t be going better for the Democrats.
2026-09-21 · assertive framing · The One Legit Reason for Dem Panic
Also by Lauren Egan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by Lauren Egan →

Topics

ACLU Democratic Philadelphia Republican the American Civil Liberties Union

Subjects

ACLU ORG · 4× Democratic NORP · 2× Republican NORP · 2× American NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× ICE ORG · 1× Philadelphia GPE · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× the American Civil Liberties Union ORG · 1× the Justice Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

ACLU officials told me that while they weren’t surprised by the ruling, they were caught off guard by how quickly Republican-controlled states rushed to carve up the electoral power of black voters in the South—underscoring the importance of the work they were doing.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 For two and a half days, the group walked through twenty-five variations on how Donald Trump and his allies might mess with the midterm elections.
2026-11-02 · The Bulwark
Inside the Wargaming to Foil Trump’s Election Meddling · assertive framing

Claims (15 extracted, 1 hedged)

THEY FLEW IN FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY: asserted
THEY → fly → COUNTRY
Some 250 lawyers, policy experts, communication staffers, and other leaders from the American Civil Liberties Union huddled in a hotel conference room in Philadelphia last April trying to figure out what to do if American democracy goes to shit. asserted
democracy → huddle → shit
For two and a half days, the group walked through twenty-five variations on how Donald Trump and his allies might mess with the midterm elections. uncertain
Trump → walk → elections
The scenarios ranged from Trump casting doubt on the results without evidence, to interference from the Justice Department, to the deployment of ICE or the National Guard at the polls, to the refusal by Republican leaders in Congress to seat Democratic victors. asserted
Trump → range → victors
Such hypotheticals had been discussed publicly and privately before. asserted
hypotheticals → discuss → ?
What the ACLU was trying to do at that gathering was to wargame what effective responses would look like—and to explore a more uncomfortable question: What if no response comes together? asserted
response → try → question
The participants wrote up mock press releases and came up with advocacy, legal, and organizing game plans. asserted
participants → write → plans
They made state-specific plans and worked through who, in each scenario, would be their first call: the state attorney general, the election director, or some other figure. asserted
who → make → scenario
Lending a feeling of urgency to the proceedings was some breaking news: As the participants worked through the scenarios, the Supreme Court announced its ruling gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. asserted
Court → lend → Act
ACLU officials told me that while they weren’t surprised by the ruling, they were caught off guard by how quickly Republican-controlled states rushed to carve up the electoral power of black voters in the South—underscoring the importance of the work they were doing. asserted
they → tell → work
And one other theme emerged as the conference went on: More than in any previous election, this year’s midterms would be contested in states with known election deniers in positions of power over election administration. asserted
midterms → emerge → administration
“It’s hard to imagine that these people who have gone to such trouble, to such lengths, to try to take power, are going to just peacefully accept the results,” Deirdre Schifeling, the ACLU’s chief political and advocacy officer, told me. asserted
Schifeling → ’ → me
“We are prepared on all fronts,” Schifeling said. asserted
Schifeling → say → fronts
The ACLU is not the only pro-democracy organization that has been engaged in this type of preparation in the leadup to the midterms. asserted
that → engage → midterms
In fact, in nearly a dozen conversations with officials at civil-society groups and Democratic-aligned organizations this week, it became clear that quietly, behind the scenes, asserted
it → align → scenes
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support