Photo via Mother Jones

Trump’s Attempts to Interfere in the Midterms Have Been “Complete Failures”

Read the original at Mother Jones ↗
Cite

Michaels, S. (2026, October 29). Trump’s Attempts to Interfere in the Midterms Have Been “Complete Failures”. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/10/trumps-attempts-to-interfere-in-the-midterms-have-been-complete-failures/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Mother Jones · collected 2026-10-29 · by Samantha Michaels

Quick Summary

The Trump administration is attempting to interfere with midterm elections by deploying immigration officers to check voter registration and disputing mail-in ballots, particularly in California where 28 green card holders were arrested. Advocacy groups have filed lawsuits against these actions, arguing they constitute voter intimidation and misuse unreliable data. A federal court recently blocked ICE from conducting door-knocking operations until after Election Day due to potential violations of the Voting Rights Act. Elections expert David Becker asserts that such federal interference is unprecedented and claims the administration's efforts are failing.
Written by AI on 2026-10-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 30, 2026, a federal appeals court in California rejected the Justice Department's latest bid to force the state to set aside over 20,000 mail-in ballots from individuals suspected of being noncitizens, just days before the midterm elections. The department initially sued California on October 15, alleging that these individuals were unlawfully registered to vote and sought a court order to prevent their ballots from being counted until citizenship status was verified.

The Justice Department had sent Los Angeles County officials a list of suspected noncitizen voters via a password-protected thumb drive, demanding they confirm the citizenship status of anyone on this list. However, California officials refused to comply with the request, arguing that it lacked credible evidence and could disenfranchise eligible voters. The appeals court’s rejection marks the second time in less than a week that such efforts have been denied.

This legal battle has raised concerns about voter suppression tactics and the politicization of election integrity measures, particularly as criticism mounts against the Justice Department's handling of these allegations. California officials, including Governor Gavin Newsom, argue that this move is an attempt to undermine public confidence in the electoral process ahead of the elections.

Written for “DOJ Subpoena Battle Over California Ballots” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 73 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 DOJ Subpoena Battle Over California Ballots
Politics · 74 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 20 claims Outlet record 70/100
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 51 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses observers monitoring polling places on Election Day, while Article B details specific actions by immigration officers and the administration's efforts to prevent alleged voter fraud in California.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses observers expected to monitor US election day for interference, while Article B describes specific actions and legal challenges related to alleged voting irregularities and ICE involvement.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 34 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 64 claims Outlet record 97/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of election interference attempts by federal officials; Article A focuses on Maine's preparation and potential interference, while Article B discusses operations in California.”
NBC News
Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Hindu
Hedges 1 of 10 claims Outlet record 77/100
Mother Jones
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 95/100
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 5 of 52 claims Outlet record 95/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
101
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
13 of 101 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
95/100
Mother Jones's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
74
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Mother Jones · 412 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Samantha Michaels
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The administration is also trying to stop officials in California and Los Angeles County from counting 20,000 mail-in ballots that the administration claims could be coming from noncitizens.
🔮 In June 2025, before Zohran Mamdani was elected mayor of New York City, he went on a popular internet show called Subway Takes.
🔮 For several days this spring, trapped inside a Texas immigration detention center, Luis made frantic phone calls, one after the other, to everyone he could think of.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · “You Kidnapped My Son”
🔮 You might not have heard about this just because there’s a lot going on (gestures everywhere).
Also by Samantha Michaels
“You Kidnapped My Son”
2026-10-05 · Mother Jones
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

California ICE Los Angeles County Operation Protect the Vote the Protect Democracy Project

Subjects

California GPE · 3× Homeland Security ORG · 2× Homeland Security Investigations ORG · 2× ICE ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× the Department of Justice ORG · 2× the Supreme Court ORG · 2× Beau Tremitiere PERSON · 1× Los Angeles County GPE · 1× the Protect Democracy Project ORG · 1×

Narrative

California asked for that; they didn’t give it to them, and then they waited three months to file a lawsuit, long after mail ballots had already gone out, after federal law prohibited the state from conducting voter list maintenance. Let’s say, hypothetically, there was a federal government working in good faith that thought it had evidence that some people on voter lists in the states were not citizens.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-29
🔮 The administration is also trying to stop officials in California and Los Angeles County from counting 20,000 mail-in ballots that the administration claims could be coming from noncitizens.

Claims (101 extracted, 13 hedged)

Immigration officers don’t normally focus on elections, but lately they’ve been showing up at houses, armed and in uniform, to see if people are illegally registered to vote. asserted
people → focus → uniform
They’ve been doing this in multiple states, including California, where the feds arrested 28 green card holders as part of “Operation Protect the Vote.” asserted
feds → do → Vote
The administration is also trying to stop officials in California and Los Angeles County from counting 20,000 mail-in ballots that the administration claims could be coming from noncitizens. uncertain
administration → try → noncitizens
All of this is unprecedented, and it’s not happening without a fight. asserted
it → happen → fight
Advocacy groups say the administration is using unreliable data, and that it’s so-called voter protection operation is just a ploy to scare people, including citizens who are lawfully registered. asserted
who → say → citizens
“It’s a textbook case of voter intimidation,” says Beau Tremitiere, an attorney at the Protect Democracy Project who sued the administration along with co-counsel at the National Immigration Law Center and San Francisco and Santa Clara counties. asserted
who → ’ → Center
(It’s one of multiple similar lawsuits nationally.) asserted
It → ’ → lawsuits
Last week, a federal court in that case blocked Homeland Security from its door-knocking until after Election Day, arguing that it likely violated the Voting Rights Act. asserted
it → block → Act
But could ICE still show up at the polls? uncertain
ICE → show → polls
I turned to elections expert David Becker, a former Justice Department attorney who now leads the “fiercely nonpartisan” Center for Election Innovation and Research, and who’s been following the news closely. asserted
who → turn → news
“For the first time in American history,” he told me, the feds have become “an adversary to state and local election officials, rather than a partner and a collaborator.” asserted
feds → tell → officials
So far, they’re failing miserably. asserted
they → fail → ?
The conversation was edited for length and clarity. asserted
conversation → edit → length
Homeland Security Investigations, which is part of ICE, should not be knocking on the doors of individuals it suspects, often wrongly, are noncitizens who may be registered to vote. uncertain
who → knock → individuals
The federal government has a general policy about not doing things in close proximity before an election, because it could interfere. uncertain
it → have → election
That’s particularly true for the Department of Justice—they are not to undertake investigations, question individuals, or file charges in close proximity to an election. asserted
they → ’ → election
This administration is not only ignoring those prohibitions; they’re actively ramping up as we get closer to an election, perhaps out of desperation. asserted
we → ignore → desperation
If they had any possible legal justification to knock on doors, that should have been done months ago, not weeks before an election. asserted
that → have → election
Once that happens, it runs the risk of seeming to be an intentional interference. asserted
it → happen → risk
Beyond door-knocking, what could DHS do to interfere with the midterms? uncertain
DHS → do → midterms
There’s virtually nothing they could easily do. uncertain
they → ’ → ?
One thing that’s getting lost in all this—in the concerns about federal interference—is how much of a failure they all are. asserted
they → lose → failure
The entire federal government has been weaponized to manufacture anything that could support President Trump’s false claims about voter fraud and voter theft. uncertain
that → weaponize → fraud
Over 21 months, after mobilizing Homeland Security and the Department of Justice and the FBI and the intelligence community, they failed. asserted
they → mobilize → Justice
Their two executive orders have been blocked by multiple courts, including the Supreme Court. asserted
orders → block → Court
They are zero for 27 in their lawsuits trying to seize sensitive voter data, and nine of those courts have Trump-appointed judges! asserted
nine → try → judges
They can’t get any legislation through a Congress that their own party controls. asserted
party → get → that
Their investigations of past elections have resulted in nothing, and so this is all a lot of noise, and it’s failing. asserted
it → result → noise
I mean, it’s being blocked. asserted
it → mean → ?
The California [federal] court blocked that Homeland Security Investigations door-knocking. asserted
court → block → knocking
The Missouri redistricting shenanigans were shut down by the Supreme Court. asserted
shenanigans → shut → Court
The executive order on mail voting was blocked by the Supreme Court. asserted
order → block → Court
A federal judge ruled against the frivolous California ballots lawsuit. asserted
judge → rule → lawsuit
And the Alaska courts are going to strike down the even more frivolous lawsuit seeking to preemptively stop a state from certifying an election under its own laws. asserted
courts → go → laws
So I don’t think we should lose the fact that, while it’s exhausting and it should not be normalized that the federal government is trying to do all these things, they are also complete failures. asserted
they → think → things
And you’re skeptical that DHS would show up at the polls? asserted
DHS → ’re → polls
I’m virtually certain it will not. asserted
it → ’m → ?
Look, federal law is very clear: It is a felony to order troops or armed men, civilian or military, anywhere near a voting location, punishable by up to five years in prison, a fine, and really importantly, disqualification from federal office. asserted
It → look → office
It will not happen. asserted
It → happen → ?
But there’s another reason it won’t happen. asserted
it → ’ → ?
…and 61 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support