Photo via CBS News

Midterm elections preview: How might this year's vote change Washington?

Read the original at CBS News ↗
Cite

Pogue, D. (2026, November 1). Midterm elections preview: How might this year's vote change Washington? CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/midterm-elections-preview-how-might-this-years-vote-change-washington/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

CBS News · collected 2026-11-01 · by David Pogue

Quick Summary

This article discusses key factors influencing the upcoming midterm elections, including President Biden's historically low approval ratings and soaring inflation concerns among voters. Susan Glasser notes that this year’s election will break records in political ad spending with over $11 billion, though these ads are unlikely to change voter opinions due to economic frustrations. Additionally, the article highlights the rise of AI-generated content in campaign advertisements, raising legal questions about authenticity and transparency in such digital manipulations.
Written by AI on 2026-11-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The 2026 midterm elections are approaching, with voters set to choose all 435 members of the House of Representatives and one-third of Senators on Tuesday. New Yorker politics columnist Susan Glasser predicts these elections will be historic due to President Trump's historically low approval ratings, driven by widespread economic dissatisfaction, particularly over rising costs of gas and groceries. Additionally, Wesleyan University professor Erika Franklin Fowler notes that this year will see a record number of political ads, further intensifying the election cycle.

Written for “Midterm Elections Preview” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.25, but 2 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 121299: no verified evidence · logged 2026-11-01

Story

📰 Midterm Elections Preview
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Both articles discuss the significance and implications of US midterm elections but do not describe a single specific incident or occurrence.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Both articles discuss the upcoming U.S. midterm elections but describe different aspects and perspectives leading up to the election, not a single specific incident.”
Euronews
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 15 of 86 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss upcoming midterm elections and their potential impact on Washington, they are written at different times leading up to the event and cover different aspects of the election context.”
CBC News
Hedges 9 of 93 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss the upcoming midterm elections in 2026, they do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
46
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
8 of 46 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
CBS News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBS News · 4334 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David Pogue
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 She believes Tuesday's elections will be historic in a long list of ways.
🔮 You may even have heard the phrase "human extinction."
2026-09-27 · assertive framing · Will artificial intelligence really kill us all?
Also by David Pogue
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Democrats New Yorker Wesleyan University the House of Representatives

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 6× Fowler PERSON · 4× Senate ORG · 4× Glasser PERSON · 3× Republican NORP · 3× Salvanto PERSON · 3× Trump ORG · 3× Congress ORG · 2× House ORG · 2× Texas GPE · 2×

Narrative

But Glasser has more immediate concerns about what happens after the elections: "Donald Trump said that he won't accept the results of any election that he personally does not think were conducted the way he wanted them to be."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-01
🔮 She believes Tuesday's elections will be historic in a long list of ways.

Claims (46 extracted, 8 hedged)

Every four years, we get to choose our own president. asserted
we → get → president
But every two years, we have other elections, where we choose all 435 members of the House of Representatives, and a third of our Senators, and a whole lot of governors. asserted
we → have → governors
This is a midterm elections year, our chance to steer the direction of the country. asserted
This → steer → country
"These are historically viewed as referenda on the job performance of a president," said New Yorker politics columnist Susan Glasser. asserted
Glasser → view → president
She believes Tuesday's elections will be historic in a long list of ways. asserted
elections → believe → ways
"The president is the most unpopular American president in the history of modern polling going into a midterm election," Glasser said. asserted
Glasser → go → election
"People are so angry," Glasser said. asserted
Glasser → say → ?
"It's symbolized in how much money they're paying to put gas in their cars at the pump, or how much money they're paying for groceries. asserted
they → symbolize → groceries
"This will be a record-breaking year basically any way you slice it," said Wesleyan University professor Erika Franklin Fowler, who studies political ads. asserted
who → break → ads
"The amount of money that's being spent is enormous." asserted
that → spend → money
But do political ads actually change anybody's mind? asserted
ads → change → mind
"Really not all that much," Fowler said. asserted
Fowler → say → ?
"No amount of advertising is going to change citizens' minds about the cost of goods in this type of economy." asserted
amount → go → economy
Also historic is the rise of artificial intelligence in the ads: Computer-generated scenes of candidates that look like real video. asserted
that → generate → video
Fowler said, "It's having candidates say things that they never said or do things that they never did. asserted
they → say → that
Those are particularly concerning because it's not clear to the viewer that this never happened." asserted
this → happen → viewer
"There's no federal regulation of AI in advertising," said Fowler, "so most of it actually doesn't even carry a disclaimer. asserted
most → be → disclaimer
And with just days to go before the election, is any ad, or any rally, going to change a voter's mind? asserted
ad → go → mind
"That might be the irony of it all – we're seeing a lot more early voting this year," Fowler said, "and so a lot of the advertising that's on air now is actually too late to make a difference." uncertain
that → see → difference
Pollster Anthony Salvanto, who conducts our , said, "We see, overall, the numbers shifting toward the Democrats. asserted
numbers → conduct → Democrats
It's not historically unusual for a president's party to lose seats in a midterm. asserted
party → lose → midterm
"So, what is driving voters: The war? asserted
what → drive → voters
Salvanto said, "It all of the above." asserted
Salvanto → say → above
Another big factor, according to Salvanto, is the president: "Two-thirds of folks tell us they're going to the polls for Congress either to support him (26%), or, in more cases, to oppose his policies (41%)." The president is a factor for the candidates, too. uncertain
president → accord → candidates
Most ads for Republican candidates don't even mention Mr. Trump. asserted
ads → mention → Trump
Sometimes they even criticize his policies, such as Michigan Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers' ad calling for an end to President Trump's tariff war against Canada. asserted
they → criticize → Canada
According to the latest CBS News House model, the Democrats are on pace to win 229 seats, giving them the majority. uncertain
Democrats → accord → majority
As for the Senate, Salvanto said, "At the start of the year, there weren't many folks who gave Democrats a chance to take the Senate. asserted
who → say → Senate
Well, what we've seen over time is that a lot of those red Republican states have in fact come into play. asserted
lot → see → play
Doesn't mean the Democrats are going to win them, but they certainly look to be more competitive." asserted
they → mean → them
The idea that Texas and might elect Democratic Senators is definitely historic. uncertain
Texas → elect → Senators
Glasser said, "The last time that Democrats won a Senate seat in Kansas was in the 1930s. asserted
Democrats → say → 1930s
The last time a Democrat was elected to the U.S. Senate from Texas was Lloyd Bentsen in 1988." asserted
Democrat → elect → 1988
What comes after the election? asserted
What → come → election
So, if the Democrats win control of both houses of Congress, does that change anything? asserted
that → win → anything
According to Susan Glasser, "I think you would see efforts to restrain the Defense Department from spending more money, for example on Trump's war with Iran. uncertain
you → accord → Iran
I think you might see very aggressive oversight and investigation hearings. uncertain
you → think → hearings
I think you'll see them issue subpoenas. asserted
them → think → subpoenas
But Glasser has more immediate concerns about what happens after the elections: "Donald Trump said that he won't accept the results of any election that he personally does not think were conducted the way he wanted them to be." asserted
them → have → way
Asked if she thinks the president might try to invalidate or interfere with the results, Glasser laughed: "I don't think that's a speculative question. uncertain
that → ask → results
…and 6 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support