Photo via Fox News

TIM GRAHAM: Three-to-one negative coverage tells the story of network bias

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Graham, T. (2026, October 31). TIM GRAHAM: Three-to-one negative coverage tells the story of network bias. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tim-graham-three-to-one-negative-coverage-tells-story-network-bias

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-31 · by Tim Graham analysis

Quick Summary

TIM Graham writes about perceived bias in broadcast network news coverage during the 2024 campaign, focusing on a Media Research Center study that found ABC, CBS, and NBC evening newscasts provided President Donald Trump with 85% negative coverage compared to Democrat Kamala Harris receiving 78% positive coverage. The article highlights a three-to-one ratio of negative coverage towards Republicans versus Democrats over the period from September 28 to October 26. Graham argues that this imbalance suggests networks are more aligned with Democratic narratives, questioning whether such coverage resembles news or campaign advertising.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Tim Graham from Fox News argues in a recent article that major network news outlets, specifically ABC, CBS, and NBC, exhibit significant bias against Republican President Donald Trump and the broader GOP. According to a Media Research Center study covering July 21 through October 25 of 2024, these networks provided 85% negative coverage of Trump compared to 78% positive coverage for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. Graham contends this disparity suggests that news reporting has shifted towards campaign-style advertising rather than neutral journalism, with the networks framing political narratives heavily against Trump and in favor of Democrats. He highlights specific instances such as extensive coverage of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack and claims that Trump poses a danger to democracy, arguing these themes disproportionately overshadowed positive news about Trump or balanced reporting.

Written for “Network Bias Against TIM Graham” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 119549: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Network Bias Against TIM Graham
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses a study by Media Research Center about Apple News' coverage leading up to midterms, while Article B talks about network bias in broadcast news during the 2024 campaign.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 5 of 53 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of media coverage towards Trump, with Article A focusing on Fox News specifically and criticisms leading up to midterms, while Article B discusses a broader study on ABC, CBS, and NBC networks over a longer period.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of media coverage without describing the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 44 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6257 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tim Graham
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 That math could be a little misleading, since the bad scandal news for Democrats, like the immigration agents raiding the home of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., came wrapped in framing against the Trump administration for doing this in the closing weeks of an election.
🔮 But the usual instinct for elitist media is to move very slowly to guess about the motive – even if it might seem obvious.
🔮 Sisario tried to argue stadiums were more willing to allow antisemitic rapper Kanye West, and concluded: "I also think it is specifically about the political issue of the war in Gaza, and whether criticism of Israel's stance and Israel's actions in that war is considered allowable."
🔮 The newest eruption of doom came over artificial intelligence, and how it could end up causing the destruction of all humanity within a decade.
Also by Tim Graham
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

ABC CBS Democrats NBC Republicans

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 12× Democrats NORP · 9× Republicans NORP · 6× Democrat NORP · 3× ABC ORG · 2× CBS ORG · 2× NBC ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Kamala Harris PERSON · 1× Media Research Center ORG · 1×

Narrative

Anyone perusing social media can see the Democrats salivating at more impeachments of Trump, and maybe an impeachment for Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., not to mention some very aggressive hearings into how the Trump family is personally prospering in Trump’s second term.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 That math could be a little misleading, since the bad scandal news for Democrats, like the immigration agents raiding the home of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., came wrapped in framing against the Trump administration for doing this in the closing weeks of an election.

Claims (44 extracted, 2 hedged)

Watching the broadcast news networks report on campaigns makes you think they’re not creating news as much as they’re trying to make the political weather. asserted
they → watch → weather
On every day, in every way, they labor to place the blackest clouds over the heads of President Donald Trump and the Republicans. asserted
they → labor → Trump
Any hint of neutrality is despised as "normalizing" Trump. asserted
hint → despise → Trump
Nonpartisanship somehow becomes partisanship. asserted
Nonpartisanship → become → ?
A Media Research Center study of the 2024 campaign from July 21 through Oct. 25 found ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts punished Trump with 85% negative coverage. asserted
newscasts → find → coverage
Meanwhile, the Democrat nominee, Kamala Harris, received 78% positive coverage. asserted
nominee → receive → coverage
One choice sounded like doom, and the other was painted as hope and joy and "vibes." asserted
other → sound → hope
With that kind of stark difference in tone, does that sound like news, or campaign advertising? asserted
that → sound → news
Leading the themes two years ago was the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, including Trump’s insistence that the 2020 election was rigged – 47 minutes of coverage. asserted
election → lead → coverage
Another 30 minutes was spent amplifying claims that Trump is a "danger to democracy" and/or a "fascist." uncertain
Trump → spend → democracy
It's happening again in 2026. asserted
It → happen → 2026
The Media Research Center just found ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from Sept. 28 to Oct. 26 gave Trump and the Republicans almost 57 minutes of negative coverage on the evening news, while the Democrats received almost 19 minutes of negative coverage – a three-to-one ratio. asserted
Democrats → find → ratio
That math could be a little misleading, since the bad scandal news for Democrats, like the immigration agents raiding the home of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., came wrapped in framing against the Trump administration for doing this in the closing weeks of an election. uncertain
news → raid → election
(These results came before the new eruption over "Decoy Dan" Sullivan in Alaska.) asserted
results → come → Alaska
It was the same pattern on the formerly taxpayer-funded "PBS News Hour." asserted
It → fund → Hour
From Sept. 1 to Sept. 30, the GOP received 94% negative spin, to 6% positive. asserted
GOP → receive → %
The Democrats received far more balanced coverage – 53% negative, 47% positive. asserted
Democrats → receive → coverage
No one would say the network news should avoid negative news. asserted
news → say → news
Consumers inherently don’t trust happy news any more than they trust gushy positive campaign commercials. asserted
they → trust → commercials
But the overwhelming tone of news coverage should force viewers to understand these broadcast network stars aren’t neutral referees, calling balls and strikes. asserted
stars → force → balls
They’re throwing beanballs at the Republicans. asserted
They → throw → Republicans
Inside the broadcast network news bubble, democracy is mentally associated with the Democrats, autocracy with the Grand Old Party. asserted
democracy → associate → Party
If the Republicans show party unity, that’s a failing. asserted
that → show → unity
They are weakening democracy by not weakening Trump. asserted
They → weaken → Trump
When the Democrats show party unity, that’s not controversial at all. asserted
that → show → unity
In fact, the elitist media help enforce party unity. asserted
media → help → unity
Republicans dissenting from Trump quickly draw positive media attention. asserted
Republicans → dissent → attention
"Lifelong Republicans" who endorse Democrats get promoted as the zeitgeist. asserted
who → endorse → zeitgeist
Democrat dissenters would be ignored and gain no advantage. asserted
dissenters → ignore → advantage
The growing radicalism of the Democrat party and its Democratic Socialists of America faction, and what they plan to do if they gain a majority in one or both houses of Congress, have not been serious topics. asserted
they → grow → Congress
If the voters are casting ballots for Democrats because of the economy, do the Democrats have an actual solution? asserted
Democrats → cast → solution
The networks weren’t focused on what happens next. asserted
what → focus → ?
Anyone perusing social media can see the Democrats salivating at more impeachments of Trump, and maybe an impeachment for Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., not to mention some very aggressive hearings into how the Trump family is personally prospering in Trump’s second term. asserted
family → peruse → term
During President Joe Biden’s presidency, the broadcast networks obsessed over the House’s Jan. 6 hearings, including incessant live coverage, even in prime time hours. asserted
networks → obsess → hours
In the last two years, House oversight hearings into subjects like Biden’s use of the autopen and his declining mental fitness, were largely ignored. asserted
hearings → decline → autopen
Inside the broadcast network news bubble, democracy is mentally associated with the Democrats, autocracy with the Grand Old Party. asserted
democracy → associate → Party
The networks have focused most of their attention on Trump’s rallies, often noting that when he campaigns in red states, it’s a sign that Republicans are anxious about losing in states they should be winning. asserted
they → focus → states
If former President Barack Obama campaigns in a blue state, like appearing with radical Democrat Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, that’s not painted as desperation. asserted
that → campaign → desperation
PBS reporter Liz Landers oozed on Oct. 26: "Former President Barack Obama brought his own firepower to the trail, rallying Democratic voters in two Midwestern battlegrounds on Saturday, telling crowds in Michigan and Ohio that Trump was responsible for rising costs because of the war with Iran." asserted
Trump → ooze → Iran
Trump canceling rallies in the closing days of the race is drawing negative coverage. asserted
canceling → cancel → coverage
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support