British Columbia’s new conservative government has vowed to overhaul the province’s drug policies, but perhaps that should include an investigation into whether local RCMP leaders downplayed the dangers of “safer supply.”
asserted
leaders → vow → supply
An obscure document produced by the B.C. RCMP, which originates from late 2025 and was provided to National Post last week by a concerned community member, raises questions about whether the mounties have been fully honest with the public about the failures of “harm reduction.”
asserted
mounties → produce → reduction
The 59-page slide deck delves into the myriad failures of the province’s harm-reduction policies.
asserted
deck → delve → policies
The presenter named on the cover page, Sgt. Arvind Dongriah, is the B.C. RCMP’s drug decriminalization co-ordinator and a member of its Investigative Services and Organized Crime division.
asserted
presenter → name → division
Dongriah did not present original investigative findings, and instead relied on publicly available materials and media reports that he — and presumably his colleagues — evidently found credible.
asserted
he → present → materials
His sources included the National Post, CBC and several academic papers and government resources (my own reporting was cited five times).
asserted
reporting → include → Post
From the content of the sergeant’s presentation, it is clear that the B.C. RCMP believed in 2025 that safer supply drugs were being diverted to the black market; that organized gangs were redistributing these drugs across Canada; and that decriminalization and the availability of safer supply may have worsened the opioid crisis.
uncertain
decriminalization → believe → crisis
Dongriah also questioned whether safer supply is supported by reputable research and acknowledged that there was a “failure to address diversion risks and associated harms” because, not only had reports of diversion been “initially dismissed,” there had been “no evaluation” of its existence or effects.
asserted
reports → question → existence
The sergeant recommended that safer supply drugs be consumed under medical supervision — a reform that British Columbia had already implemented by then, and which will soon be coming to Ontario — and that there be a public awareness campaign to educate Canadians about “the risks of increased hydromorphone availability.”
asserted
which → recommend → availability
The person who provided me the slide deck, Victoria-based entrepreneur Jason Heit, framed it as an internal RCMP document.
asserted
who → provide → document
His interpretation was supported by the cover page, which warns that it is “property of the RCMP” and that it is not to be “reclassified, copied, reproduced, used in whole or part or further disseminated” without the mounties’ consent.
asserted
it → support → consent
When I emailed the B.C. RCMP’s communications team, they contested that the document was private.
asserted
document → email → team
They wrote that the slide deck had been presented at the National Association of Drug Diversion Investigators (NADDI) conference in October 2025, and that it was “readily available” through NADDI’s online learning centre.
asserted
it → write → centre
However, this American online learning centre is an incredibly obscure (and sparse) resource that only NADDI’s membership can access.
asserted
membership → access → that
Individuals can only become NADDI members if they professionally work in drug control (the organization reviews and approves all applications), and Googling Dongriah’s presentation yielded no relevant search results for me.
asserted
Googling → become → me
It is far-fetched to imagine that Canadians could find and review Dongriah’s presentation unless they had prior knowledge of its existence and were making a concerted effort to retrieve it.
uncertain
they → imagine → it
The slide deck is thus functionally buried away from the eyes of the Canadian public, regardless of whether it’s technically accessible.
asserted
it → bury → public
Why does this matter, though, if Dongriah had no novel investigative findings?
asserted
Dongriah → matter → findings
Answering that requires some political context.
asserted
that → answer → context
In early 2024, amid a heated national debate around harm reduction, the B.C. RCMP made several high-profile safer supply related drug busts.
asserted
RCMP → make → busts
The organization’s leadership subsequently released a statement claiming that there was no evidence of widespread safer supply diversion.
asserted
leadership → release → diversion
This had a tremendous impact on public discourse, with harm-reduction activists widely using the B.C. RCMP’s words to gaslight and discredit critics of safer supply.
asserted
activists → have → supply
The day after the statement was released, though, the B.C. RCMP’s headquarters sent a memo to all 150 of the province’s detachments, informing them that, in order to respect the sensitivities of the upcoming provincial election, they could not directly address “hot button issues,” such as drug seizures and decriminalization, and that all media inquiries must be routed through central HQ.
uncertain
inquiries → release → HQ
News of this memo broke a month later, when a copy was obtained by long-form media outlet Northern Beat.
asserted
copy → break → Beat
The story caused a ruckus: some commentators saw it as an attempt to gag local mounties who might contradict the “safer supply is fine” narrative being pushed by the B.C. RCMP’s top brass.
uncertain
supply → cause → brass
They smelled a political cover-up.
asserted
They → smell → up
The B.C. RCMP went quiet on safer supply afterwards, even as the diversion crisis became indisputable.
asserted
crisis → go → supply
That’s why Dongriah’s presentation matters: because it shows the chasm between the B.C. RCMP’s internal beliefs and its public silence.
asserted
it → ’ → beliefs
The organization quietly acknowledged that safer supply diversion was a significant problem, yet did nothing to warn Canadians, suggesting either incompetence or, worse, an ongoing political aversion to criticizing harm-reduction shibboleths.
asserted
diversion → acknowledge → shibboleths
The B.C. RCMP’s communications team stonewalled my emailed questions on this matter.
asserted
team → stonewall → matter
They did not explain how and when the organization’s beliefs on safer supply diversion had evolved, nor why its concerns were withheld from the public.
asserted
concerns → explain → public
Instead, they referred me to the provincial ministry of health, which they claimed was the most appropriate respondent.
asserted
they → refer → health
If this were true, though, then why was it appropriate for the B.C. RCMP to publicly comment on safer supply in 2024?
asserted
RCMP → comment → 2024
You cannot defend a controversial program and then offload accountability when it blows up in your face.
asserted
it → defend → face
If the organization refuses to be transparent here, perhaps the B.C. Conservatives should step in and impose accountability.
asserted
Conservatives → refuse → accountability
The Aporia
