Photo via The Bulwark

Israel’s Democracy—And Its Relationship with America—Remain in Limbo

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
Cite

Shapiro, D. B. (2026, October 30). Israel’s Democracy—And Its Relationship with America—Remain in Limbo. The Bulwark. https://www.thebulwark.com/p/israels-democracy-and-its-relationship-with-america-limbo-elections-netanyahu-eisenkot-democrats-trump-gaza-iran

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Bulwark · collected 2026-10-30 · by Daniel B. Shapiro commentary

Quick Summary

Israel’s recent elections were expected to resolve key political issues but instead have left the country in a state of uncertainty and frustration. Despite a majority of voters seeking change, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, currently holding around 68 seats, is set to decline to about 53 seats. The opposition, led by former IDF Chief Gadi Eisenkot, has gained significant support but still falls short of a clear majority, with around 48 seats and another 18–19 from Arab parties. Netanyahu remains influential, as his Likud Party retains substantial support despite voter dissatisfaction with issues such as corruption, accountability, and the treatment of ultra-Orthodox communities.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 27, 2026, Israelis voted in a high-stakes election with a record-high voter turnout of 77.9%. The race was closely contested between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party and the centrist Yashar party led by retired Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot. No clear winner emerged from the election, leaving uncertainty about which party could form the next government. Arab-majority lists were poised to play a significant role as potential kingmakers due to their voter base’s dissatisfaction with Netanyahu's leadership. The election results have raised concerns over Israel's internal divisions and its ability to address pressing security issues.

Written for “Israeli Election Results Unclear” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 219 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 116812 (high confidence, 5 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-30

Story

📰 Israeli Election Results Unclear
Politics · 220 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Outlet record 70/100
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 13 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and perspectives regarding Israeli elections but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 4 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects and timeframes of Israel's election, with Article A focusing on the perspective of Palestinian citizens during the election campaign, while Article B covers the aftermath and outcomes of the elections.”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and outcomes related to Israel's elections but do not describe the exact same specific incident or moment.”
Semafor
⚖️ Centre further right than this Hedges 2 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss the Israeli election, they describe different aspects and stages of the event.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss the implications and outcomes of recent Israeli elections, they describe different aspects and interpretations of the election's aftermath rather than a single specific incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 10 of 79 claims Outlet record 66/100
National Post
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 6 of 25 claims Outlet record 60/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Israeli politics and society without clearly referring to the same specific incident or outcome.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss Israel's elections but cover different aspects and timelines; Article A focuses on the day of voting with emphasis on US-Israel relations, while Article B discusses post-election outcomes and ongoing uncertainties.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
68
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
12 of 68 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
220
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Bulwark · 552 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Daniel B. Shapiro
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 ISRAEL’S ELECTIONS SEEMED TO PROMISE resolution: an answer to what kind of judiciary Israel would have, to how its war with Iran and its proxies would be managed, to what place the ultra-Orthodox and settler extremists have in Israeli society, and to what kind of relationship Israel would have with the United States.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Arab ISRAEL Iran Israeli ultra-Orthodox

Subjects

ISRAEL GPE · 9× Arab NORP · 4× Israeli NORP · 4× Iran GPE · 3× Israelis NORP · 3× Netanyahu PERSON · 3× ultra-Orthodox NORP · 3× Gaza GPE · 2× Knesset ORG · 2× the West Bank GPE · 2×

Narrative

ISRAEL’S ELECTIONS SEEMED TO PROMISE resolution: an answer to what kind of judiciary Israel would have, to how its war with Iran and its proxies would be managed, to what place the ultra-Orthodox and settler extremists have in Israeli society, and to what kind of relationship Israel would have with the United States.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
🔮 ISRAEL’S ELECTIONS SEEMED TO PROMISE resolution: an answer to what kind of judiciary Israel would have, to how its war with Iran and its proxies would be managed, to what place the ultra-Orthodox and settler extremists have in Israeli society, and to what kind of relationship Israel would have with the United States.

Claims (68 extracted, 12 hedged)

ISRAEL’S ELECTIONS SEEMED TO PROMISE resolution: an answer to what kind of judiciary Israel would have, to how its war with Iran and its proxies would be managed, to what place the ultra-Orthodox and settler extremists have in Israeli society, and to what kind of relationship Israel would have with the United States. asserted
Israel → seem → States
Instead, the elections seem to have offered more of the same—more logjam, more muddling through, more uncertainty, more frustration. asserted
elections → seem → same
Israelis don’t receive much sympathy these days. asserted
Israelis → receive → sympathy
Much of the world is angered by the conduct of Israel’s campaign in Gaza, the violence perpetrated by Israeli extremists in the West Bank, and Israel’s advocacy for the war with Iran that has led to regional and global economic disruptions. asserted
that → anger → disruptions
But even for those who hold such views, it may be possible to summon some understanding of the frustration many Israeli voters feel after a hard-fought election campaign, which led to only one conclusion: Israeli politics are stuck. uncertain
politics → hold → conclusion
In the election held this week, a clear majority of voters registered their desire for change. asserted
majority → hold → change
While counting continues, the parties in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition, which currently hold 68 seats in the 120-seat Knesset, are set to decline to around 53 seats. asserted
which → continue → seats
The demand for change is not primarily driven by the issues that grab international headlines, like the war with Iran and the situation in Gaza. asserted
that → drive → Gaza
As in every country at almost every time, internal considerations dominate: leadership, accountability, burden-sharing, the rule of law. asserted
considerations → dominate → law
Voters who are demanding change view Netanyahu and his coalition as derelict on all of these measures. asserted
who → demand → measures
They see in him a divisive, corrupt leader who places his own interests and survival above the nation’s. asserted
who → see → nation
He has blocked the formation of a state commission of inquiry to establish accountability for the failures ahead of the massive Hamas terrorist attack of October 7th. asserted
He → block → 7th
He backs the demands of his ultra-Orthodox partners to exempt their communities from military conscription, even as other Israelis have served hundreds of days of reserve duty in the last three years. asserted
Israelis → back → years
And his government makes minimal effort to crack down on criminality, whether by Jewish extremists attacking Palestinians (and others) in the West Bank or a wave of organized crime killings in Israel’s Arab communities. asserted
government → make → communities
Those grievances helped consolidate an opposition coalition made up of democracy defenders, good-government right-wingers, survivors of the October 7th attack, those concerned with Israel’s international standing, and Arab citizens asserted
grievances → consolidate → standing
Gadi Eisenkot, the former chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, led an opposition bloc of four parties who agreed on the fundamental requirement of ousting Netanyahu, which netted around 48 seats. asserted
which → lead → seats
The turnout in the Arab sector set new records, and two Arab parties will likely hold 18–19 seats between them. asserted
parties → set → them
It is clear that Netanyahu retains support, reflected in the fact that his Likud Party will remain the largest single party in the Knesset, with around 27 seats. asserted
Party → retain → seats
He has his die-hard supporters, those who see him as an experienced security hand, those who treat voting Likud as a tribal loyalty, believers in a deep state that is trying to railroad him, and young Israelis who have known almost no other leader. asserted
who → have → leader
Despite the failures of October 7th, some give him credit for Israel’s military achievements afterwards. asserted
some → give → achievements
In his election-night speech, he recited the list of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iranian leaders killed by Israel in the past three years. asserted
he → recite → years
While locking in coalition partners—ultra-Orthodox and far-right parties—with nowhere else to go, he then cannibalized seats from within his own bloc, ensuring that Likud and the bloc as a whole overperformed pre-election polls. asserted
Likud → lock → polls
Even so, he has no easy path to form a government. asserted
he → have → government
In Hebrew, they call this a “plonter”: a complete entanglement with no solution. asserted
they → call → solution
FOR EISENKOT’S OPPOSITION BLOC, there are three options, each worse than the others, each a potential form of political suicide. asserted
each → be → suicide
They could try to form a minority government, inviting the Arab Ra’am party to join from within, while seeking the passive support of the more hardline Arab Joint List party from without. uncertain
They → try → party
While mathematically possible, it requires overcoming deep mutual suspicion by party leaders like Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman who oppose relying on Arab parties after October 7th, and the Joint List itself, which defines itself as anti-Zionist and does not call Hamas a terrorist organization. asserted
which → require → Hamas
Forming such a government would be immensely popular among Europeans, who are important economically and politically for Israel, as well as among American Democrats. asserted
who → form → Democrats
And it would present the opportunity of passing some measures to safeguard Israeli democracy against the kind of power-concentrating reforms Netanyahu has backed. asserted
Netanyahu → present → reforms
But any such government would be inherently weak, unstable, and probably short-lived. asserted
government → live → ?
New elections would almost certainly be held within months, and, as Lieberman has warned, Netanyahu could come roaring back to power. uncertain
Netanyahu → hold → power
The minority government option might have had more appeal if Eisenkot’s bloc had fared better. uncertain
bloc → have → appeal
But as they trail Netanyahu’s bloc, the arrangement’s legitimacy would be widely challenged, even by members of Eisenkot’s Yashar Party. asserted
legitimacy → trail → Party
Short of forming a minority government, the larger opposition—i.e., all of the parties not in Netanyahu’s bloc—could try to use their majority in the Knesset, which will be seated within two weeks, to advance legislation that fulfills their anti-Netanyahu agenda. uncertain
that → form → agenda
It would require unusual discipline and unified effort among the Jewish and Arab parties. asserted
It → require → parties
Netanyahu is already trying to discredit the option as illegitimate, including by hurling accusations of foreign (Qatari) vote-buying in Arab towns, which are now under investigation. asserted
which → try → investigation
This scenario would play out while Netanyahu’s current government continues in its caretaker status, and would really be used by Eisenkot as leverage for better terms in negotiations on a unity government. asserted
government → play → government
While Netanyahu’s detractors in Israel and Europe may enjoy seeing him challenged in this way, the longer it goes on, complete with court challenges and street protests, the more Israel’s democracy would appear unstable and mired in stalemate. uncertain
democracy → enjoy → stalemate
Alternatively, they could pursue a unity government, agreeing to join a Netanyahu-led coalition. uncertain
they → pursue → coalition
Netanyahu would insist on going first in prime ministerial rotation, and retaining the support of his ultra-Orthodox and far-right partners. asserted
Netanyahu → insist → partners
…and 28 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support