Photo via New York Post

Lefties’ cheers for Lula’s Brazil victory should leave US citizens very worried

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Post Editorial Board. (2026, October 29). Lefties’ cheers for Lula’s Brazil victory should leave US citizens very worried. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/29/opinion/us-lefties-cheers-for-brazils-lula-should-scare-you/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-29 · by Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

The article discusses concerns about Brazil's recent election, where incumbent President Lula da Silva won re-election amid allegations of judicial bias and political persecution against opposition figures. Critics argue that the victory signals a deterioration of democratic norms in Brazil, with opposition leaders facing travel bans and investigations by judges seen as aligned with Lula. The piece suggests parallels between these developments and potential risks for U.S. democracy if progressive Democrats gain more power, emphasizing fears over similar tactics being used against political opponents.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The New York Post expresses concern over Brazilian President Luiz Inácio "Lula" da Silva's recent reelection, arguing it reflects poorly on democracy. Following his victory, a partisan judge ordered conservative Senator Flavio Bolsonaro to hand over his passport and remain in Brazil for an investigation, raising questions about judicial impartiality. The article notes Lula’s past convictions for corruption that were later overturned on technical grounds, and suggests the election results may be questionable. Journalist Glenn Greenwald highlights several individuals fleeing Brazil due to what they perceive as persecution by pro-Lula courts.

Written for “Lula's Victory In Brazil” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 116052: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Lula's Victory In Brazil
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
TIME
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 72 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Lula's victory in Brazil, Article A focuses on the election results and their significance, whereas Article B highlights a subsequent legal action taken against Bolsonaro after his loss.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes reactions to Lula's victory, while Article B focuses on concerns regarding judicial actions post-victory and their implications for US politics.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 14 claims
“The articles describe different stages or aspects of the election aftermath and its legal consequences, not the same specific incident.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 42 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss Lula's victory in Brazil, they describe different aspects and contexts around the event.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 38 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on Flávio Bolsonaro fleeing Brazil, while Article B mentions an order for him to surrender his passport and remain in the country, which are different but related events.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 96/100
“Article A describes the election results in Brazil and Serbia, while Article B discusses the aftermath and legal consequences for Flavio Bolsonaro after his defeat.”
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 32 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles mention Flávio Bolsonaro's travel and legal issues, Article A focuses on his arrival in Miami after losing the election, while Article B discusses a court order for him to surrender his passport before he fled.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 28 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles mention Flávio Bolsonaro's departure to the US after his electoral defeat, they describe different aspects and timelines of the incident.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Lula's victory and Bolsonaro's situation, Article A focuses on the suspicious circumstances of the election win, while Article B highlights concerns over Justice Alexandre de Moraes' order for Bolsonaro to surrender his passport. These are different aspects of related events.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A reports on Flavio Bolsonaro's declaration after fleeing to the US, while Article B discusses the legal actions against him before he fled.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
2 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15525 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Post Editorial Board
113 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It may well be a federal crime, as a conspiracy to deceive and injure the public’s exercise of constitutional voting rights.
🔮 “The people united will never be defeated!
🔮 “The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans.” Yes, it’s awful that Ilhan Omar was being investigated by — checks the record — the Obama administration.
🔮 — Barack Obama, Saturday We say: Will Obama never stop glazing the “Death to America” crew?
🔮 She’s also used an “immigration specialist” to help frame “dispositions that will prevent unwanted immigration consequences.”
🔮 The rioting — a black-bloc assault on the Colosseum! — should be a wakeup call, prompting Macron & Co. to rally the sensible center against the anarchists, crypto-communists and Islamists. Stand up for civilization, or the assault will redouble.
🔮 Credible sources discredit the notion that her father could “rise to the rank of colonel with no role in that military’s massive-scale genocide.”
🔮 If the US Supreme Court hadn’t stepped in to stop them, Albany Democrats would have happily erased NYC’s lone Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis’ district off the map entirely.
🔮 New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez’s big win against Meta last week means huge risks for every successful company in America; if this decision holds up, the same garbage-lawsuit model could destroy any business.
🔮 Debt patrol: Stop the All-Consuming Fraud Blob Our “monstrous national debt” has turned into a “quickly growing blob [that] is consuming everything in its path and will destroy America” unless government overspending is curbed, warns Deborah Collier at The Hill.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 113 articles by Post Editorial Board →

Topics

America Brazil Brazilian Democrats the United States

Subjects

Lula PERSON · 6× Brazil GPE · 4× Alexandre de Moraes PERSON · 2× America GPE · 2× Bolsonaro PERSON · 2× Brazilian NORP · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× pro-Lula PERSON · 2× Flavio Bolsonaro PERSON · 1× Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Congratulations, President Lula,” cheered Mayor Zohran Mamdani on X. Yet Lula’s continued rule looks like bad news for Brazil: The economy has flagged on his watch, with inflation outpacing wage increases and GDP growth sluggish, and the nation’s stock market plunged in the wake of his surprise victory.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 “The people united will never be defeated!

Claims (15 extracted, 2 hedged)

The left’s celebration of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva’s reelection victory is more reason to worry about Democrats sweeping next week’s US midterms. asserted
Democrats → worry → midterms
Literally minutes after Lula was declared the winner, partisan Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the loser, conservative Sen. Flavio Bolsonaro, to surrender his passport and remain in the country, pending an investigation. asserted
loser → declare → investigation
Bolsonaro was lucky to escape to the United States, which granted him a visa. asserted
which → escape → visa
Yes, it’s possible the senator (not yet charged with anything) is guilty of some crimes. But the prepared-in-advance order by a notoriously pro-Lula judge (and himself immersed in a corruption scandal), reportedly without even consulting Brazil’s prosecutor general, is hardly a sign of a healthy democracy. uncertain
order → charge → democracy
Lefty journalist Glenn Greenwald, reporting from Brazil, notes that Bolsonaro isn’t the only one to have gotten out of Dodge “to escape the tyrannical persecution of Alexandre de Moraes and the pro-Lula wing of the Supreme Court.” asserted
Bolsonaro → report → Court
Greenwald cites “dozens of Brazilian exiles who have done the same: dissident journalists, activists, bloggers, and politicians who all fled to avoid certain prison for political opposition.” asserted
who → cite → opposition
One wag claimed that, when it comes to lawfare, Lula is “[Sen.] Elissa Slotkin cubed.” asserted
Lula → claim → lawfare
And America’s socialist left cheered his win with gusto. asserted
left → cheer → gusto
“Congratulations to Lula on his extraordinary reelection victory,” gushed Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). asserted
Sanders → gush → victory
“The people united will never be defeated! asserted
people → unite → ?
Congratulations, President Lula,” cheered Mayor Zohran Mamdani on X. Yet Lula’s continued rule looks like bad news for Brazil: The economy has flagged on his watch, with inflation outpacing wage increases and GDP growth sluggish, and the nation’s stock market plunged in the wake of his surprise victory. asserted
market → cheer → victory
Then again, that’s pretty much what Democrats here vow to do if they gain power on Tuesday — and even more so if they take the White House in 2028. asserted
they → ’ → 2028
A Dem House and/or Senate is guaranteed to launch probes of President Donald Trump and his team — with prosecutions of even the lowliest in the offing if Slotkin has her way. asserted
Slotkin → guarantee → way
No, America is not (yet) Brazil, but the growing power within the Democratic Party of progressives who’ve for decades cheering a long string of anti-democratic Latin leftists suggests it can happen here. uncertain
it → grow → leftists
Add in Dems’ obsessive lawfare against Trump & Co. — with not a hint of regret even now — and everyone who threatens to get in the hard left’s way has serious reason to fear. asserted
who → add → reason
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support