Photo via Fox News

Trump DOJ's fight over 20K suspected noncitizen voters takes sharp turn as California ballots pour in

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Schmad, R. (2026, October 29). Trump DOJ's fight over 20K suspected noncitizen voters takes sharp turn as California ballots pour in. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-dojs-fight-over-20k-suspected-noncitizen-voters-takes-sharp-turn-california-ballots-pour

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-29 · by Robert Schmad

Quick Summary

Judge David O. Carter rejected the Justice Department's request to set aside over 20,000 mail-in ballots in California based on suspected non-citizenship of voters, ruling it would disrupt ongoing elections. California officials argued that separating and identifying these specific ballots from the already processed pool of more than 500,000 was impractical and questioned the reliability of the government’s evidence. The decision comes amid a series of setbacks for the Trump administration in election-related legal battles.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 30, 2026, the Trump Justice Department has issued subpoenas to California election workers in Los Angeles County as part of a criminal investigation into alleged voting by non-citizens, escalating its battle with the largest US state over electoral integrity. On October 15, the Justice Department sued California in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that more than 20,000 noncitizens are unlawfully registered to vote and have received mail-in ballots. The lawsuit followed a letter from Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter on October 14, demanding that state officials review a list of suspected non-citizens by noon the next day. California has questioned the reliability of the federal government's immigration data and argued that states administer elections under the U.S. Constitution. A federal judge in California had previously rejected a request to set aside ballots for voters on the disputed list, further complicating the legal battle over voter eligibility.

Written for “Trump DOJ Subpoenas California Officials Over Voting Probe” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 67 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence medium 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 115134 (medium confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-30

Story

📰 Trump DOJ Subpoenas California Officials Over Voting Probe
Politics · 68 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 3 of 26 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 68/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
NPR
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 27 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 41 claims Outlet record 66/100
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 12 claims Outlet record 70/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
1 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
68
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 5956 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Robert Schmad
39 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 U.S. District Judge David O. Carter on Wednesday rejected the Justice Department's emergency request to force California to set aside mail-in ballots associated with more than 20,000 registered voters whose citizenship the Trump administration has questioned, ruling that the last-minute intervention would disrupt an election already underway.
🔮 Barlow, however, cited a ruling from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that found "an ordinary English speaker would not say that she has come into possession of something that she created, established and maintained," a reference to the broad dataset the DOJ was seeking to obtain.
🔮 Socialism is gaining popularity among young Americans, but Fox News Digital found strikingly different understandings of the ideology among college students, some of whom acknowledged that their generation may not fully grasp what they're embracing.
🔮 Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed is set to rally with former President Barack Obama on Saturday as Republicans raise questions about his support among Black voters, a crucial Democratic constituency in the battleground state.
🔮 "I respectfully dissent because — even, and perhaps especially, when an election is looming — I would not disturb a clearly justifiable federal-court order issued to ensure that the public receives accurate information about a State’s electoral processes," she wrote.
🔮 "I want young people coming out of school to say, âShould I go work for the Trump administration? Like, that sounds fun, I might get an opportunity.â
🔮 And the question — that you would ask that — I think is actually really quite shameful.
🔮 In May 2025, Plymouth hosted drag queen "Flamy Grant" for a concert, according to advertisements for the event, bringing an artist whose broader catalog includes sexually explicit lyrics to the progressive Des Moines congregation.
🔮 As California grapples with soaring Medi-Cal costs — including billions spent on healthcare for immigrants without legal status — Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic lawmakers have backed a revised health-plan tax in response to new federal restrictions, a move critics warn could shift more costs onto privately insured Californians.
🔮 Dozens of individuals backed by the Democratic Socialists of America are set to appear on ballots as candidates for state legislature seats on Election Day, something Republicans say could set in motion a trend that transforms the Democratic Party.
Also by Robert Schmad
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 39 articles by Robert Schmad →

Topics

California Department of Justice Homeland Security Investigations U.S. the Justice Department's

Subjects

California GPE · 10× the Justice Department's ORG · 3× Carter PERSON · 2× Congress ORG · 2× Fox News Digital ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× David O. Carter PERSON · 1× Department of Justice ORG · 1× Homeland Security Investigations ORG · 1×

Narrative

" Rick Hasen, a University of California, Los Angeles, election-law professor, meanwhile, called the Justice Department’s request a "total overreach of federal power," arguing that "the Constitution’s clear that states have the authority to run Congressional elections unless Congress passes a statute otherwise — and Congress didn’t do so here."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
🔮 U.S. District Judge David O. Carter on Wednesday rejected the Justice Department's emergency request to force California to set aside mail-in ballots associated with more than 20,000 registered voters whose citizenship the Trump administration has questioned, ruling that the last-minute intervention would disrupt an election already underway.

Claims (20 extracted, 1 hedged)

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter on Wednesday rejected the Justice Department's emergency request to force California to set aside mail-in ballots associated with more than 20,000 registered voters whose citizenship the Trump administration has questioned, ruling that the last-minute intervention would disrupt an election already underway. asserted
intervention → reject → election
The over 20,000 voters identified by Department of Justice officials as "likely aliens" were designated as such after Homeland Security Investigations and federal partners "used multiple data-enrichment and verification methods" to flag potential non-citizens on California’s voter rolls. asserted
Investigations → identify → rolls
California officials, however, disputed the list's accuracy, citing a preliminary review that identified U.S.-born individuals and voters with no voting history among those flagged. asserted
that → dispute → those
Carter, a Clinton appointee, ruled that the Justice Department's last-minute effort to intervene in California's election violated constitutional and federal-law constraints, while questioning the reliability of the government's evidence that the flagged voters were noncitizens. asserted
voters → rule → evidence
"The district court denied our emergency request to sequester ballots from 20,000 suspected noncitizens," First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital. asserted
Essayli → deny → Digital
"This ongoing emergency disenfranchises American citizens through dilution. asserted
emergency → disenfranchise → dilution
The Solicitor General authorized an immediate appeal. asserted
General → authorize → appeal
We filed our Notice of Appeal and will immediately seek an emergency order from the Ninth Circuit. asserted
We → file → Circuit
" The Trump administration has suffered a string of defeats in election-related cases in the lead-up to the midterm elections, raising questions as to whether the administration will be able to deliver on its promises of improved election integrity ahead of the 2028 presidential election. asserted
administration → suffer → election
President Donald Trump and other administration officials have repeatedly raised concerns about widespread voter fraud in U.S. elections, though those claims have not been supported by evidence demonstrating fraud on such a broad scale. uncertain
claims → raise → scale
California election officials argued that complying with the Justice Department's request would be virtually impossible because county election offices had already processed more than 500,000 ballots, separating them from identifying information and preventing officials from reliably linking those votes to individual voters. asserted
offices → argue → voters
Carter warned that the requested intervention would "wreak havoc and disrupt the election that is already underway," though he noted that federal authorities were free to pursue individual voting fraud cases. asserted
authorities → warn → cases
Experts were divided along ideological lines in the case. asserted
Experts → divide → case
Hans von Spakovsky, an election expert at Advancing American Freedom, a Mike Pence-affiliated think tank, criticized California for refusing to comply with the DOJ’s request. asserted
Spakovsky → affiliate → request
"It tells you something very revealing and unfortunately badly revealing about California officials that they don’t even want to check," von Spakovsky told The Center Square. asserted
Spakovsky → tell → Square
"In California, for example, they have automatic voter registration. asserted
they → have → registration
When you go in to get a driver’s license, they don’t ask you, ‘Would you also like to register to vote?’ asserted
you → go → you
The state of California just automatically registers you, and when you ask them, they say, ‘Well, it’s up to the individuals to tell us they’re not eligible to vote.’ asserted
they → register → us
" Rick Hasen, a University of California, Los Angeles, election-law professor, meanwhile, called the Justice Department’s request a "total overreach of federal power," arguing that "the Constitution’s clear that states have the authority to run Congressional elections unless Congress passes a statute otherwise — and Congress didn’t do so here." asserted
Congress → call → statute
The California governor’s office did not respond to a request for comment when reached by Fox News Digital on Thursday. asserted
office → respond → Thursday
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support