Photo via Dawn

ATC sentences Imaan, Hadi to 10 years in security breach case

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Asad, M. (2026, October 29). ATC sentences Imaan, Hadi to 10 years in security breach case. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2040694/atc-sentences-imaan-hadi-to-10-years-in-security-breach-case

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-10-29 · by Malik Asad

Quick Summary

On Thursday, an anti-terrorism court in Islamabad sentenced human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to 10 years in prison each for a security breach case related to disrupting an international cricket team’s security route. The couple was also fined under three separate legal provisions after a trial that concluded on October 27, with the verdict reserved until October 29. Imaan and Hadi claim they are being persecuted for their human rights work and have challenged the trial in higher courts, arguing that their constitutional rights to fair trial and due process were violated during the proceedings.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 29, 2026, an Anti-Terrorism Court in Islamabad sentenced human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to 10 years each in prison for a security breach case related to the removal of barriers along a route designated for an international cricket team's convoy on October 25, 2024. The couple was indicted on October 7, 2026, and pleaded not guilty during their trial at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi. They had previously been sentenced to up to 17 years for social media posts criticizing the military but were released after Pakistan's Supreme Court suspended those sentences; however, they were re-arrested before their release could be finalized.

Imaan and Hadi have consistently denied the charges against them, alleging that these cases are part of a broader pattern of harassment targeting human rights activists in Pakistan. Legal experts and international organizations like Amnesty International have condemned the verdict as an indictment of Pakistan’s justice system, highlighting concerns over fair trial rights and judicial independence.

Written for “Imaan Mazari And Hadi Sentenced” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 5 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but none of the 2 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 114129: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-30

Story

📰 Imaan Mazari And Hadi Sentenced
Politics · 6 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 72/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 43 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A describes Imaan and Hadi challenging the IHC order, while Article B reports on their sentencing by an ATC, which are different stages of the legal process.”
Dawn
Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A describes the conclusion of final arguments and the reserving of verdict, while Article B reports on the actual sentencing a day later.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
6
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2460 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Malik Asad
43 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Following the completion of the trial and final arguments, the court reserved its verdict and said that it would be pronounced on Oct 29.
🔮 “But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.”
🔮 He will preside over a single bench at the Rawalpindi registry.
🔮 While offering yet another opportunity to human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to record their statements in a security breach case, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Saturday warned them that a verdict could come even without their testimony if they refused.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony
🔮 Meanwhile, no prosecution witness could be cross-examined during Thursday’s hearing amid the dispute over the state counsel’s appointment.
🔮 Justice Malik remarked with a smile, “In that case, you might as well remove our badges too, as we are also currently serving as additional judges.”
🔮 Describing the charge as the foundation of a trial, Azad maintained that any defect in its framing would undermine the legality of the subsequent proceedings.
🔮 He warned that they could face imprisonment if it was not presented before the court.
🔮 On the application filed by the defence, he said, “I have received your applications; I will issue an order regarding this.
🔮 The court observed that Barrister Gohar could have submitted his response in writing.
Also by Malik Asad
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 43 articles by Malik Asad →

Topics

ATC IHC ISLAMABAD Section 342 the Code of Criminal Procedure

Subjects

Imaan PERSON · 6× IHC ORG · 4× Hadi PERSON · 3× ATC ORG · 1× Atif Mehmood PERSON · 1× Dawn ORG · 1× Hadi Ali Chattha PERSON · 1× ISLAMABAD GPE · 1× Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir PERSON · 1× Tahir Abbas Sipra PERSON · 1×

Narrative

‘Prisoners of conscience’ In their statements recorded under Section 342 (power to examine the accused) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Imaan and Hadi had denied the charges and alleged that they were being targeted for their human rights work and provision of pro bono legal assistance and services to the marginalised and oppressed communities.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
🔮 Following the completion of the trial and final arguments, the court reserved its verdict and said that it would be pronounced on Oct 29.
2026-10-30 · Dawn
ATC sentences Imaan, Hadi to 10 years in security breach case · assertive framing

Claims (34 extracted, 1 hedged)

An anti-terrorism court on Thursday sentenced human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, to 10 years in prison each in the security breach case. asserted
court → sentence → case
Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra announced the verdict at Adiala Jail, where the trial was conducted. asserted
trial → announce → Jail
The court had reserved its judgment on October 27, following the conclusion of final arguments. asserted
court → reserve → arguments
The sentence was handed down under three separate legal provisions. asserted
sentence → hand → provisions
Fines were also imposed on both accused. asserted
Fines → impose → accused
Imaan and Hadi were being tried in jail in a 2024 case pertaining to the alleged disruption of an international cricket team’s security route and incitement to public unrest. asserted
Imaan → try → unrest
The couple, accused of removing barriers from the route, was indicted on Oct 7. asserted
couple → accuse → Oct
A formal trial commenced after both lawyers pleaded not guilty. asserted
lawyers → commence → ?
The court had appointed a state counsel for the defence in the case. asserted
court → appoint → case
State counsel Atif Mehmood conducted the cross-examination of the witnesses during the trial, while the prosecution presented a total of seven witnesses. asserted
prosecution → conduct → witnesses
On Oct 27, both accused recorded their statements under Section 342 (power to examine the accused) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, while final arguments by the state counsel also concluded during the proceedings. asserted
arguments → accuse → proceedings
Following the completion of the trial and final arguments, the court reserved its verdict and said that it would be pronounced on Oct 29. asserted
it → follow → Oct
On Monday, the couple approached the SC to challenge the IHC’s Oct 19 order refusing to stay the trial in the case. asserted
couple → approach → case
The IHC had heard their appeals last week against an Oct 10 ATC order dismissing petitions challenging the framing of charges and the inclusion of terrorism-related provisions. asserted
IHC → hear → provisions
The high court issued notices and said it would decide how to proceed after receiving responses from the parties. asserted
it → issue → parties
‘Prisoners of conscience’ In their statements recorded under Section 342 (power to examine the accused) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Imaan and Hadi had denied the charges and alleged that they were being targeted for their human rights work and provision of pro bono legal assistance and services to the marginalised and oppressed communities. asserted
they → record → communities
“The evidence produced during this trial is not against us, but in fact a charge sheet against (prosecution witnesses)/police officials and the state,” Imaan and Hadi said in their separate similar recorded statements available with Dawn. asserted
Imaan → produce → Dawn
“I am a prisoner of conscience who has been at the receiving end of state persecution,” the statements read. asserted
statements → receive → persecution
Imaan pointed out that the entire jail trial had been challenged by the couple in the IHC as well as the SC. asserted
trial → point → IHC
Further, the trial was conducted with Imaan and her husband being presented in a cage, preventing effective communication with their counsel or the court, she said. asserted
she → conduct → counsel
“From day one, our constitutional rights to fair trial, due process and basic human dignity have been infringed,” she stated. asserted
she → infringe → trial
She also noted that the couple had been incarcerated for over nine months and handed 17-year sentences a day after their arrest on Jan 23. asserted
couple → note → Jan
“We are being made an example to further cement the chilling effect against those who stand (or want to stand) against tyranny, oppression and injustice,” Imaan stated. asserted
Imaan → make → tyranny
The lawyer further highlighted that the two had spent the third year of their marriage in jail and thus “suffered painful separation from one another” very early on. asserted
two → highlight → one
“We have not done so for any personal gain; in fact, we have endured only hardship for our work (and) activism,” she said. asserted
she → do → work
“But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.” asserted
they → surrender → what
Jailed, sentenced, re-arrested The couple has been in jail since their arrest on January 23 in a case registered against them for protesting outside the IHC and allegedly manhandling the IHC Bar Association president. uncertain
couple → jail → president
The arrest prompted criticism by rights bodies, politicians and journalists, who stressed the couple’s right to a fair trial. asserted
who → prompt → trial
Just a day later, a sessions court sentenced them to 17 years on multiple charges under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act in the controversial social media posts case. asserted
court → sentence → case
The convictions were widely condemned by lawyers and United Nations (UN) experts. asserted
convictions → condemn → lawyers
On September 17, following months of litigation before the courts, the SC suspended their sentences in the case. asserted
SC → follow → case
The SC ordered their release pending the IHC’s final verdict on their appeals against the trial court’s decision. asserted
SC → order → decision
However, the reprieve was short-lived as hours later, Islamabad police arrested the couple again in connection with the security breach case. asserted
police → live → case
The case was registered at the federal capital’s Kohsar police station on March 22 last year on the complaint of City Magistrate Ghulam Murtaza Chandio. asserted
case → register → Chandio
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support