The Aporia
News Desk. (2026, October 29). 'Absolutely absurd verdict': Lawyers, journalists react to Imaan, Hadi's sentencing in security breach case. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2040698/absolutely-absurd-verdict-lawyers-journalists-react-to-imaan-hadis-sentencing-in-security-breach-case
News Desk. “'Absolutely absurd verdict': Lawyers, journalists react to Imaan, Hadi's sentencing in security breach case.” Dawn, 29 Oct. 2026, https://www.dawn.com/news/2040698/absolutely-absurd-verdict-lawyers-journalists-react-to-imaan-hadis-sentencing-in-security-breach-case.
News Desk. “'Absolutely absurd verdict': Lawyers, journalists react to Imaan, Hadi's sentencing in security breach case.” Dawn, October 29, 2026. https://www.dawn.com/news/2040698/absolutely-absurd-verdict-lawyers-journalists-react-to-imaan-hadis-sentencing-in-security-breach-case.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
On Thursday, October 29, 2026, an anti-terrorism court in Pakistan sentenced human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to 10 years in prison on terrorism-related charges. The couple was convicted for removing road barriers along a route designated for the touring England cricket team in October 2024 in Islamabad, an act they claim was harassment related to their human rights work.
Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra announced the verdict at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi after concluding the trial on Tuesday. The judge ruled that the couple's actions put “the security of [the England and Wales Cricket] team at risk,” but also noted that it was a common incident. Both Mazari and Chattha denied the charges, stating they were "prisoners of conscience."
Legal experts and journalists have condemned the verdict as politically motivated persecution. Reema Omer from the International Commission of Jurists termed the convictions “cruel and vindictive,” while Amnesty International called them an indictment of Pakistan’s justice system. The defense plans to file a petition against the verdict in the Supreme Court, arguing that Mazari and Chattha were not provided with key legal documents or allowed to defend themselves adequately.