Imaan, Hadi allege security breach case 'nothing more than harassment' for their human rights work

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Asad, M. (2026, October 28). Imaan, Hadi allege security breach case 'nothing more than harassment' for their human rights work. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2040437/imaan-hadi-allege-security-breach-case-nothing-more-than-harassment-for-their-human-rights-work

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-10-28 · by Malik Asad

Quick Summary

Human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha have alleged that their case for disrupting an international cricket team’s security route is harassment related to their human rights work. The anti-terrorism court concluded the case at Adiala Jail on Tuesday, reserving its verdict after hearing final arguments from state counsel and recorded statements from Imaan and Hadi under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Both accused claim that prosecution witnesses are part of the state machinery targeting them for their work with marginalized communities, including street vendors and victims of false blasphemy allegations. They argue that the evidence presented is not against them but rather implicates police officials and the state.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, have alleged that a case against them for disrupting an international cricket team’s security route is "nothing more than harassment" aimed at silencing their human rights work. The couple appeared before the anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Adiala Jail on October 25, 2026, where they recorded statements under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They were indicted on October 7, 2024, for allegedly removing barriers from a security route and inciting public unrest. The ATC reserved its verdict after concluding final arguments by state counsel. Imaan and Hadi claim that the evidence presented is actually a charge sheet against prosecution witnesses and police officials rather than against them.

Written for “Imaan Hadi Security Breach Case Controversy” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but 2 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 111837: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 Imaan Hadi Security Breach Case Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 18 📰 publisher trust 72
“While both articles discuss Imaan and Hadi's security breach case at Adiala Jail, Article A covers a warning by an ATC judge about a potential verdict without their testimony on October 25th, while Article B describes them recording their statements under Section 342 of CrPC and concludes the case with final arguments by state counsel on October 28th.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 43 📰 publisher trust 72
“While both articles discuss Imaan and Hadi's legal challenges related to a security breach case, they describe different stages of proceedings: Article A covers their Supreme Court appeal against the IHC order refusing to stay the trial, while Article B discusses their allegations about the case being harassment and the conclusion of arguments at the ATC.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
2 of 35 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2359 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Malik Asad
41 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.”
🔮 He will preside over a single bench at the Rawalpindi registry.
🔮 While offering yet another opportunity to human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to record their statements in a security breach case, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Saturday warned them that a verdict could come even without their testimony if they refused.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony
🔮 Meanwhile, no prosecution witness could be cross-examined during Thursday’s hearing amid the dispute over the state counsel’s appointment.
🔮 Justice Malik remarked with a smile, “In that case, you might as well remove our badges too, as we are also currently serving as additional judges.”
🔮 Describing the charge as the foundation of a trial, Azad maintained that any defect in its framing would undermine the legality of the subsequent proceedings.
🔮 He warned that they could face imprisonment if it was not presented before the court.
🔮 On the application filed by the defence, he said, “I have received your applications; I will issue an order regarding this.
🔮 The court observed that Barrister Gohar could have submitted his response in writing.
🔮 Lawyers representing human rights activists and lawyers Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha, along with Shireen Mazari, boycotted proceedings of an anti-terrorism court on Wednesday after the judge decided to record prosecution witnesses’ statements despite the defence’s request to defer the exercise until they could meet the accused.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Lawyers of Imaan, Hadi boycott ATC proceedings
Also by Malik Asad
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 41 articles by Malik Asad →

Topics

ATC Dawn IHC the Code of Criminal Procedure the Islamabad High Court

Subjects

Imaan PERSON · 9× Hadi PERSON · 2× ATC ORG · 1× Dawn ORG · 1× Hadi Ali Chattha PERSON · 1× IHC ORG · 1× Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir PERSON · 1× Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited ORG · 1× the Islamabad High Court ORG · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

On the charges against the two of removing security barriers placed in connection with the movement of an international cricket team at Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited on Faisal Avenue on Oct 25, 2024, Imaan stated she and her husband were on their way to the court when the police told them that the route had been temporarily closed as an alternative route for the cricket team.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 “But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.”

Claims (35 extracted, 2 hedged)

Human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, have alleged that the case against them pertaining to a security breach was “nothing more than harassment” for their legal and human rights work, falling under the broader pattern of targeting through “reprisals”. asserted
case → allege → reprisals
On Tuesday, the case concluded at Adiala Jail, with the anti-terrorism court (ATC) reserving its verdict. asserted
court → conclude → verdict
Both accused recorded their statements under Section 342 (power to examine the accused) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, while final arguments by the state counsel also concluded during the proceedings. asserted
arguments → accuse → proceedings
Imaan and Hadi are facing a jail trial in a 2024 case on the alleged disruption of an international cricket team’s security route and incitement to public unrest. asserted
Imaan → face → unrest
The couple, accused of removing barriers from the route, were indicted on Oct 7. asserted
couple → accuse → Oct
“The evidence produced during this trial is not against us, but in fact a charge sheet against (prosecution witnesses)/police officials and the state,” Imaan and Hadi said in their separate similar recorded statements available with Dawn. asserted
Imaan → produce → Dawn
They claimed that the prosecution witnesses were “part and parcel” of the state machinery that had allegedly targeted them for their human rights work and provision of pro bono legal assistance and services to the marginalised and oppressed communities, including street vendors and victims of false blasphemy allegations and enforced disappearances. uncertain
that → claim → allegations
“I am a prisoner of conscience who has been at the receiving end of state persecution,” the statements by the lawyer couple read. asserted
statements → receive → couple
Imaan pointed out that the entire jail trial had been challenged by the couple in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) as well as the Supreme Court (SC). asserted
trial → point → Court
Further, the trial was conducted with Imaan and her husband being presented in a cage, preventing effective communication with their counsel or the court, she said. “From day one, our constitutional rights to fair trial, due process and basic human dignity have been infringed,” she stated. asserted
she → conduct → trial
On the charges against the two of removing security barriers placed in connection with the movement of an international cricket team at Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited on Faisal Avenue on Oct 25, 2024, Imaan stated she and her husband were on their way to the court when the police told them that the route had been temporarily closed as an alternative route for the cricket team. asserted
route → remove → team
At this, Imaan said that she enquired whether the police officials had a copy of the magistrate’s order for closure, which the police did not have. asserted
police → say → which
She also pointed out that such an order was yet to be produced by the prosecution in the trial. asserted
order → point → trial
Imaan denied the prosecution testimonies, saying they were “false, fabricated and contradictory” to the video footage of the incident. asserted
they → deny → incident
She further held that the video had also confirmed that one of the police officials threw a barrier at her lower abdomen, due to which she fell to the ground. asserted
she → hold → ground
“The timing and mode and manner (including both jail trial in a cage and speed of instant proceedings) of the trial reflect the objective to keep us behind bars at all costs,” Imaan said. asserted
Imaan → include → costs
She further alleged that prosecution witnesses had been directed by “higher-ups/senior officers to falsely depose against us to punish for our human rights work”. asserted
witnesses → allege → work
She also noted that the couple had been incarcerated for over nine months and handed 17-year sentences a day after their arrest on Jan 23. asserted
couple → note → Jan
“We are being made an example to further cement the chilling effect against those who stand (or want to stand) against tyranny, oppression and injustice,” Imaan stated. asserted
Imaan → make → tyranny
The lawyer further highlighted that the two had spent the third year of their marriage in jail and thus “suffered painful separation from one another” very early on. asserted
two → highlight → one
“We have not done so for any personal gain; in fact, we have endured only hardship for our work (and) activism,” she said. asserted
she → do → activism
“But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.” asserted
they → surrender → what
Meanwhile, Hadi, in his recorded statement available with Dawn, said: “I am being punished for not only supporting my wife’s work and activism, but for choosing this path of resisting injustice as our life journey together.” asserted
I → record → injustice
He added: “It is deeply painful for me that while my work on human rights has received recognition abroad, even today, my family and I continue to suffer reprisals for the same in my home country.” asserted
family → add → country
On Monday, the couple approached the SC to challenge the IHC’s Oct 19 order refusing to stay the trial in the case. asserted
couple → approach → case
The IHC had heard their appeals last week against an Oct 10 ATC order dismissing petitions challenging the framing of charges and the inclusion of terrorism-related provisions. asserted
IHC → hear → provisions
The high court issued notices and said it would decide how to proceed after receiving responses from the parties. asserted
it → issue → parties
Jailed, sentenced, re-arrested The couple has been in jail since their arrest on Jan 23 in a case registered against them for protesting outside the IHC and allegedly manhandling the IHC Bar Association president. uncertain
couple → jail → president
The arrest prompted criticism by rights bodies, politicians and journalists, who stressed the couple’s right to a fair trial. asserted
who → prompt → trial
Just a day later, a sessions court sentenced them to 17 years on multiple charges under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act in the controversial social media posts case. asserted
court → sentence → case
The convictions were widely condemned by lawyers and United Nations (UN) experts. asserted
convictions → condemn → lawyers
On Sept 17, following months of litigation before the courts, the SC suspended their sentences in the case. asserted
SC → follow → case
The SC ordered their release pending the IHC’s final verdict on their appeals against the trial court’s decision. asserted
SC → order → decision
However, the reprieve was short-lived as hours later, Islamabad police arrested the couple again in connection with the security breach case. asserted
police → live → case
The case was registered at the federal capital’s Kohsar police station on March 22 last year on the complaint of City Magistrate Ghulam Murtaza Chandio. asserted
case → register → Chandio
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support