In Washington, unlikely bedfellows like Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon talk about making AI "humans first"

CBS News · collected 2026-09-15 · by Kathryn Watson
Read the original at CBS News ↗

Summary

At a recent event called the "Pro-Human Assembly" in Washington, D.C., political opposites Steve Bannon and Bernie Sanders joined forces to advocate for stricter regulations on AI technology. Along with bipartisan members of Congress, they expressed concerns over the rapid advancement and potential risks posed by AI, such as loss of control and catastrophic consequences if it surpasses human intelligence. Both speakers emphasized the need for a "human-centric" approach, though Bannon accused tech CEOs of trying to shift liability onto the public while reaping financial benefits themselves.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
20%
9 of 44 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
77.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
11
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · source text last changed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

On September 14, 2026, Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon, political opposites from Vermont and former Trump advisor respectively, united on a Washington D.C. stage to demand stricter regulations on artificial intelligence (AI). This unexpected partnership reflects growing concerns about AI's risks across traditional party lines. Both warned of the potential catastrophic consequences if AI surpasses human control. They were joined by Hollywood stars like Ashley Judd and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, religious leaders, and child safety advocates at the "Pro-Human Assembly" organized by the Future of Life Institute. The event aimed to convince Congress to act faster on AI regulations, highlighting a shift in political alliances due to shared fears about emerging technology's impact on human welfare and job security.

Written for “AI Regulation Debate Sanders Bannon” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 10 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.45, but none of the 5 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 11381: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-16

Story

📰 AI Regulation Debate Sanders Bannon
Politics · 11 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 20% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NPR · 0.88 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 21 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon speaking at the 'Pro-Human Assembly' on the same day to discuss curbs on AI, indicating they are covering the same specific incident.”
The Independent · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 5 of 39 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon speaking at a 'Pro-Human Assembly' in Washington, D.C. on the same day, calling for restrictions on AI.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 8% hedged 1 of 12 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the same gathering on Tuesday where Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon spoke about AI regulations.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 6 of 59 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon speaking at a gathering called the 'Pro-Human Assembly' in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday to discuss AI regulation.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe different gatherings with distinct participants and dates.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 23% hedged 3 of 13 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses Jacob Coxon's resignation and concerns about AI leading to human extinction, while Article B covers a political gathering in Washington where Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon spoke about guardrails for AI.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 29 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses China's response to AI threat narratives and calls for a slowdown in development, while Article B covers a bipartisan meeting in Washington D.C. where political figures advocate for guardrails on AI.”
Times of India
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 20% hedged 3 of 15 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles describe two different gatherings: one hosted by King Charles with AI industry leaders and UK officials at Dumfries House in Scotland, and another featuring Bernie Sanders, Steve Bannon, and members of Congress in Washington D.C.”
September 13, 2026 different event · 95%
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 10 of 65
“Article A describes Dario Amodei's essay published on September 12, while Article B mentions a gathering in Washington on Tuesday where politicians spoke about AI regulation and references Amodei's call for slowing down AI development but does not describe the same specific event.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 8 of 99
“Both articles describe the same 'Pro-Human Assembly' event on September 14, 2026, where Steve Bannon and Bernie Sanders spoke about AI regulation alongside other political figures.”

Publisher

CBS News · 515 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-14
The AI bubble is leaking air, some economists say. Should investors worry?
2026-08-24
Sean Grayson, convicted in killing of Sonya Massey, dies in prison, attorney says

Who wrote this

Kathryn Watson
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Washington — Steve Bannon, one of President Trump's earliest advisers, and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders may stand on opposite sides of the political spectrum, but both spoke at a gathering Tuesday to press for guardrails for AI.
🔮 The president posted about AI development on Truth Social repeatedly Monday, insisting claims that AI will destroy the world are a "HOAX."The president's stance posted to Truth Social comes
🔮 - The annual ceremony at Ground Zero in New York City will include an extra moment of silence this year for those who were later stricken with .
🔮 According to court filings reviewed by CBS News in D.C. Superior Court, since Friday, Pirro's office also moved to dismiss or said it would who were charged with vandalizing the Reflecting Pool.
More on this subject from Kathryn Watson
All 5 articles by Kathryn Watson →

Topics

Anthropic Congress OpenAI Texas Washington

Subjects

Bannon PERSON · 5× Roy PERSON · 5× Trump PERSON · 4× Americans NORP · 3× Anthropic ORG · 3× Congress ORG · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× Sanders PERSON · 2× Texas GPE · 2× Washington GPE · 2×

Narrative

They raise questions about what it means for their children, their communities," he said at the conference, adding, "So, the question here is, how do you harness the power of human-created technology to put — as we are here to discuss — humans first?"
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 Washington — Steve Bannon, one of President Trump's earliest advisers, and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders may stand on opposite sides of the political spectrum, but both spoke at a gathering Tuesday to press for guardrails for AI.

Claims (44 extracted, 9 hedged)

Washington — Steve Bannon, one of President Trump's earliest advisers, and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders may stand on opposite sides of the political spectrum, but both spoke at a gathering Tuesday to press for guardrails for AI. uncertain
both → stand → AI
The two — along with a bipartisan group of members of Congress — appeared at the "Pro-Human Assembly" in Washington, D.C. asserted
two → appear → Washington
They're calling for a "human-centric" approach to developing artificial intelligence technology, and are skeptical of the AI companies leading the industry. asserted
They → call → industry
On Saturday, Anthropic called for a slowdown in the frontier AI labs, which was quickly echoed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk. asserted
which → call → Altman
Liberal and conservative members of Congress are also urging caution. asserted
members → urge → caution
"If AI surpasses human intelligence, as many scientists believe could happen, this technology will escape human control with potentially catastrophic consequence," Sanders said as he opened his remarks. uncertain
he → surpass → remarks
"And perhaps the most important point that I want to leave with you this afternoon is that AI is advancing exponentially — exponentially every single day. asserted
AI → want → you
In other words, what you are looking at right now is the least capable version of AI that we will ever have." asserted
we → look → that
Bannon, taking the stage after Sanders, applauded the senator for his speech, saying they may disagree politically and on Mr. Trump, but they're "trying to rise above partisanship, and we have to." uncertain
we → take → partisanship
Bannon blasted the tech CEOs who have spoken out to say they need more regulations. asserted
they → blast → regulations
"That's a bald-faced lie," Bannon said, claiming tech CEOs want to "socialize" the risk, shut out competitors and reap the financial benefits for themselves. asserted
CEOs → say → themselves
Bannon said the companies are trying to make a "liability shift to the American people." asserted
companies → say → people
Bannon also said Americans, not the U.S. government, need to reap the benefits of the upside of AI, not the government. asserted
Americans → say → AI
Concern about the ability to control AI's growth has been building. asserted
Concern → control → growth
Earlier this month, AI researcher Jacob Coxon publicly resigned from Anthropic, which makes the AI app Claude, and said that artificial intelligence, while safe for people to use now, could one day threaten humanity as the technology grows more powerful. uncertain
technology → resign → humanity
"If you have a super advanced intelligence, it could — it will be smart enough to kill us," CBS News senior business and technology correspondent Jo Ling Kent. uncertain
Kent → have → us
He accused Anthropic and rival developer and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI of by racing to develop advanced AI models. asserted
He → accuse → models
At the same time, though, Mr. Trump seven Truth Social posts about AI throughout Monday, repeatedly calling fears over rapid AI development a "HOAX" and saying all AI needs is a strong president like him. asserted
AI → seven → him
GOP Rep. Chip Roy, a staunch conservative from Texas, told the conference that the crux of the issue goes well beyond "raw politics." asserted
crux → tell → politics
Roy said he hears his constituents' concerns in Texas about data centers, citing their worries about competing with data centers for water and about the noise the centers generate. asserted
centers → say → noise
But the fear goes much deeper, he said. asserted
he → go → ?
"They raise questions about their future. asserted
They → raise → future
They raise questions about what it means for their children, their communities," he said at the conference, adding, "So, the question here is, how do you harness the power of human-created technology to put — as we are here to discuss — humans first?" asserted
we → raise → humans
from May shows 65% of Americans think AI will decrease jobs, and 67% of Americans think the federal government probably or certainly will not make sure AI is used in appropriate ways. uncertain
AI → show → ways
Roy said he's been "scolded" by some of his free-enterprise Republican friends for raising these questions. asserted
he → say → questions
He also said he disagrees with Mr. Trump, who maintains that a strong president is all that's needed to safeguard AI. asserted
that → say → AI
Roy also expressed skepticism about the motives of AI CEOs like Amodei. asserted
Roy → express → Amodei
"Might they be self-interested?" Roy said. uncertain
Roy → say → ?
"Might they want to corner the market and have a monopoly environment?" uncertain
they → want → environment
AI needs to be "humans first," Roy said. asserted
Roy → need → ?
"We are not supposed to be tools for data collection and technology. asserted
We → suppose → collection
That should be what drives everything that we're thinking about going forward." asserted
we → drive → that
Just before Roy spoke, Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, a progressive from Texas, took the stage and raised U.S. competitive interests remniscient of the Cold War. asserted
Casar → speak → War
"We may be Americans or Soviets or Chinese, but we are still human," Casar said. uncertain
Casar → say → ?
"Now just as back then, we need a pro-human approach." asserted
we → need → approach
"No one can end the AI arms race. asserted
one → end → race
It's up to us to end the AI arms race," Casar said. asserted
Casar → end → race
Rep. Lori Trahan, a Democrat from Massachusetts addressed the gathering after Roy, and took note of the bipartisanship in the room and in Congress on the issue. asserted
Trahan → address → issue
Trahan introduced the FRONTIER Act with Republican Rep. Jay Obernolte of California, calling for independent evaluators of frontier AI models, among other things. asserted
Trahan → introduce → things
"Humans are not means to artificial ends," Trahan said. asserted
Trahan → say → ends
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support