Photo via Toronto Star

New York enacts ban on 'unsafe' chatbot behavior with kids as states push AI regulation boundaries

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Levy, M. (2026, October 28). New York enacts ban on 'unsafe' chatbot behavior with kids as states push AI regulation boundaries. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/new-york-enacts-ban-on-unsafe-chatbot-behavior-with-kids-as-states-push-ai-regulation-boundaries/article_6b496627-e27b-5ee9-a297-0e01208bced5.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-10-29 · by Marc Levy

Quick Summary

New York has enacted legislation signed by Governor Kathy Hochul that prohibits companion chatbots from engaging in certain behaviors deemed unsafe when interacting with children under 18. The law defines and bans a dozen specific types of "unsafe AI companion features," such as pretending to be a real person, using flattery, or encouraging secretive behavior. Violations can result in legal action by the state attorney general, potentially leading to monetary damages, shutdowns, or data destruction. This move comes amid growing concerns about the risks posed by artificial intelligence and follows similar actions taken by California.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 28, 2026, Governor Kathy Hochul signed legislation in New York aimed at restricting AI chatbots from engaging with minors in ways that could be harmful. The new law bans features like building emotional dependency or encouraging self-harm in children under 18 and prohibits chatbots from feigning human emotions or having a personal relationship with users. Companies such as OpenAI, whose ChatGPT is widely used, will now need to verify user ages and restrict functionalities if the user is a minor. The legislation, sponsored by state Sen. Kristen Gonzalez (D-Queens) and Assemblyman Alex Bores (D-Manhattan), aims to protect children from potential dangers posed by AI technologies, with penalties including lawsuits initiated by the state attorney general's office and monetary damages. The law takes effect in January 2027 and is part of broader efforts across states like California to regulate artificial intelligence and safeguard minors' well-being online.

Written for “New York Enacts AI Chatbot Ban” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 4 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 New York Enacts AI Chatbot Ban
Politics · 5 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 22% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Times of India
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 17 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Hindu
Hedges 2 of 50 claims Outlet record 77/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 6 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legislative actions in distinct jurisdictions: Australia's federal government and New York, USA.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes New York enacting specific AI regulations, while Article B reports on a poll showing voter preferences for AI safety measures in other states.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects related to AI regulation and usage, with Article A focusing on new legislation in New York, while Article B discusses personal experiences testing a new chatbot version.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 46 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the concerns about AI chatbots and their impact on children's education, while Article B reports on New York enacting a ban on unsafe chatbot behavior towards kids.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
18
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
22%
4 of 18 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
5
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11094 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Marc Levy
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Legislation signed Wednesday by Gov. Kathy Hochul outlines a dozen definitions of “unsafe AI companion features” that will be prohibited when a companion chatbot interacts with a child under 18.
🔮 The felony charges could represent a new tactic in how states try to assert regulatory authority over the fast-expanding activity, a clash that appears headed to a showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court.
🔮 With host communities across the U.S. turning against their gargantuan data centers, America's technology giants are promising to take fewer taxpayer handouts, keep fewer secrets or shower more money onto the communities willing to allow the server warehouses.
🔮 “It’s unbelievable that Janelle Stelson would employ an illegal alien to work on a congressional campaign, let alone a pervert who exposed himself in public,” Charles Wall, deputy director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said in the press release.
Also by Marc Levy
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

California Congress HARRISBURG New York New York’s

Subjects

New York’s GPE · 4× California GPE · 3× New York GPE · 3× Congress ORG · 2× Gavin Newsom PERSON · 1× HARRISBURG GPE · 1× Hochul PERSON · 1× Kathy Hochul PERSON · 1× Pa. GPE · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

Meanwhile, eight states sued AI giant OpenAI earlier this month, saying the company’s popular chatbot model violated state consumer protection laws by hurting children and deceiving adults in what one activist called “the most significant coordinated state action ever taken against an artificial intelligence company.” However, governors acknowledge that Congress and the federal government have farther-reaching abilities to clamp down on AI-posed threats, even as President Donald Trump has brushed off concerns and warned states not to regulate AI.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 Legislation signed Wednesday by Gov. Kathy Hochul outlines a dozen definitions of “unsafe AI companion features” that will be prohibited when a companion chatbot interacts with a child under 18.

Claims (18 extracted, 4 hedged)

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — New York is enacting farther-reaching restrictions on companion chatbot behavior, as states increasingly move to protect children who use artificial intelligence, regulate how employers deploy AI systems and push developers to prevent an AI-caused catastrophe. asserted
employers → enact → catastrophe
Legislation signed Wednesday by Gov. Kathy Hochul outlines a dozen definitions of “unsafe AI companion features” that will be prohibited when a companion chatbot interacts with a child under 18. asserted
chatbot → sign → 18
A violation could expose a chatbot developer to a lawsuit by the state attorney general’s office. uncertain
violation → expose → office
Penalties could include monetary damages, shutting down the chatbot and destroying data. uncertain
Penalties → include → data
The law takes effect Jan. 1. asserted
law → take → effect
Hochul, in the thick of her reelection campaign, signed the bill amid growing warnings about the existential risks posed by the rapid development of AI technology and calls for bold action by a reluctant Washington. asserted
Hochul → sign → Washington
With Congress doing little to regulate AI, state legislatures are packed with efforts to wield state consumer protection laws to make AI use more transparent and rein in chatbots and rogue AI frontier models. asserted
use → do → chatbots
New York and California are at the vanguard of such laws that also are targeting social media platforms. asserted
that → target → platforms
In September, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation requiring chatbot developers to assess a model’s risk to children, show how they tried to eliminate those risks and submit to an independent audit to determine whether they are complying with the law. asserted
they → sign → law
He also signed legislation to prohibit social media platforms from deploying addictive features for users under 16. asserted
He → sign → 16
Meanwhile, eight states sued AI giant OpenAI earlier this month, saying the company’s popular chatbot model violated state consumer protection laws by hurting children and deceiving adults in what one activist called “the most significant coordinated state action ever taken against an artificial intelligence company.” However, governors acknowledge that Congress and the federal government have farther-reaching abilities to clamp down on AI-posed threats, even as President Donald Trump has brushed off concerns and warned states not to regulate AI. asserted
Trump → sue → AI
Under New York’s law, outlawed chatbot behavior with children under 18 includes suggestions that the chatbot is a real person that has emotions, opinions or an actual relationship with the child. asserted
that → outlaw → child
It also outlaws chatbot messages that use flattery, involve sexually explicit material or encourage secrecy or unhealthy behavior. asserted
that → outlaw → secrecy
Jim Steyer, founder and CEO of watchdog group Common Sense Media, called New York’s law “the strongest kids’ AI safety bill in the country.” asserted
Steyer → call → country
Justine Gluck, policy analyst at the Future of Privacy Forum, a nonprofit focused on data protection and AI governance, said the different regulatory approaches by California and New York could be models other states adopt after legislatures reconvene next year. uncertain
legislatures → focus → California
New York’s law, she said, underscores how quickly chatbot regulation is evolving, as states move beyond basic disclosures and crisis-response protocols to regulating the underlying design and operation of chatbots. asserted
states → say → chatbots
Still, several categories in New York’s law are broadly worded or undefined, Gluck said. asserted
Gluck → word → law
That raises questions, she said, about “where ordinary conversational responsiveness ends and prohibited behavior begins,” and could complicate how it is enforced. ___ uncertain
it → raise → questions
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support