‘Emotional intimacy’ from AI chatbots would be banned under Australia’s digital duty of care laws

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Butler, J. (2026, October 28). ‘Emotional intimacy’ from AI chatbots would be banned under Australia’s digital duty of care laws. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/oct/28/emotional-intimacy-ai-chatbots-ban-digital-duty-of-care-laws-australian-politics

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-28 · by Josh Butler

Quick Summary

Australia’s federal government is proposing new digital duty of care laws that would ban AI chatbots designed to create “emotional intimacy,” especially with children, as part of broader measures aimed at enhancing online safety. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese highlighted the issue in a speech, emphasizing the need for such regulations amid concerns over children forming emotional bonds with non-human entities. The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is set for Senate debate in coming weeks, though its passage remains uncertain due to opposition from the Coalition party.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 28, 2026, the Australian government has accepted amendments from crossbencher Kate Chaney to include AI chatbot activities in its digital duty of care laws. These new provisions aim to ban "material or conduct that simulates emotional intimacy and encourages or fosters a child’s dependence on it in place of human relationships." The digital duty of care bill, which passed the House of Representatives earlier this week, will be debated by the Senate in coming weeks. The Greens support the bill, but the Coalition opposes it, leaving its path through the upper house unclear. Labor hopes to pass the bill by year-end and is seeking amendments to empower the telecommunications ombudsman as a watchdog for social media and AI, allowing external complaints mechanisms and "naming and shaming" of big tech companies.

Written for “AI Chatbot Emotional Intimacy Ban” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 111263 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 AI Chatbot Emotional Intimacy Ban
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
6 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2560 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Butler
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The digital duty of care bill passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday and will be debated by the Senate in coming weeks.
🔮 Security agencies will review safety precautions for MPs’ homes and offices after numerous federal politicians told police and Asio in safety briefings that they were worried about widening threats after the alleged attack on Helen Haines.
🔮 At his first speech to the national press club on Wednesday, he said he wasn’t launching a bid for prime minister – no matter how much some people might like the softly spoken senator to have more say in federal politics.
🔮 Whether you agree with her or you don’t on issues, you would be proud to see how she approaches issues in the Parliament; with compassion, with rigour, everything that you would want from a politician.”
🔮 Nine newspapers reported last week that seven party members had demanded an investigation into allegations Steel-John had acted inappropriately towards women between 2017 and 2025. Steele-John, in his Sunday night statement, said he was not on leave, contrary to Shoebridge’s comments last week, and claimed he had been pressured by the leader to request leave on Thursday as Nine’s story was breaking. “I feel that he used those meetings to repeatedly pressure me to say that I would take leave,” Steele-John said on Sunday.
🔮 Australians could still “listen to manosphere podcasts” or “say the moon landing was fake” under proposed new online safety laws, Anika Wells has stressed as she rubbished claims they would lead to government censorship The communications minister also said she was considering updates to the digital duty of care laws to allow individual Australians to directly sue big tech companies flouting the new rules.
🔮 His addition to what is often a tired Coalition partyroom would certainly spice things up, and give a new weapon in their arsenal.
🔮 Many mainstream Australians would feel as if they’d been dropped in a foreign country at the Conservative Political Action Conference, lost amid oblique references to transgender swimmers, blue hair, women’s bathrooms, jokes about falling off stages and Matt Canavan in hi-vis and speed dealer sunnies.
🔮 It could also be pointed out how tired the gags are.
🔮 Kwon indicated during the hearing that OpenAI would provide specific responses to more technical queries in answers to questions on notice.
Also by Josh Butler
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Josh Butler →

Topics

Australians Coalition Greens Labor Senate

Subjects

Labor ORG · 6× Australians NORP · 4× Greens ORG · 4× Senate ORG · 3× Wells PERSON · 3× Coalition ORG · 2× Anika Wells PERSON · 1× Anthony Albanese PERSON · 1× Communications ORG · 1× the House of Representatives ORG · 1×

Narrative

On Wednesday, the government accepted amendments from crossbencher Kate Chaney which would add certain AI chatbot activity to the list of harms, requiring platforms to ban “material or conduct that simulates emotional intimacy and encourages or fosters a child’s dependence on it in place of human relationships”.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 The digital duty of care bill passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday and will be debated by the Senate in coming weeks.

Claims (30 extracted, 6 hedged)

The federal government wants to ban AI chatbots which seek to create “emotional intimacy” after prime minister Anthony Albanese raised the alarm in a heartfelt speech about children treating these agents as their “best friend”. asserted
children → want → friend
But Labor is coming under increasing pressure to empower the telecommunications ombudsman to become a watchdog for social media and AI to give Australians an external complaints mechanism and allow the “naming and shaming” of big tech. asserted
media → come → tech
The digital duty of care bill passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday and will be debated by the Senate in coming weeks. asserted
bill → pass → weeks
The government hopes to pass the bill by the end of 2026, but its pathway through the upper house remains unclear. uncertain
pathway → hop → house
The Greens support the bill, while the Coalition has said it will not vote for it, though Labor still appears keen to win the opposition’s support and remains open to amendments. asserted
Labor → support → amendments
The planned framework would apply new online safety standards to social media, games, apps and chatbots. asserted
framework → plan → media
Labor said it would place “an overarching obligation” on tech platforms “to provide a safe online environment for all Australians” and replace a range of existing online codes and standards with a broader duty-of-care requirement to protect users from certain “harmful” content. asserted
it → say → content
It would also require social media platforms to offer an “opt-out” feature for its algorithm and suggested content. uncertain
It → require → algorithm
Communications minister Anika Wells has suggested content that that promotes misogyny, terrorism, suicide, self-harm and eating disorders would be captured by the laws. uncertain
that → suggest → laws
On Wednesday, the government accepted amendments from crossbencher Kate Chaney which would add certain AI chatbot activity to the list of harms, requiring platforms to ban “material or conduct that simulates emotional intimacy and encourages or fosters a child’s dependence on it in place of human relationships”. asserted
that → accept → relationships
In an emotional address on Tuesday night, where he again implored the Coalition to consider voting for the bill, Albanese said: “the stories we hear about people identifying a chatbot, a non person as their best friend, should be a huge wake up call for every member of this Parliament to be prepared to act.” asserted
member → implore → Parliament
The opposition voted against the bill in the House, alongside One Nation. asserted
opposition → vote → Nation
Political opponents have accused Labor of an “Orwellian” system of “censorship” and of seeking to influence conversations online – claims Wells strongly denied.’ uncertain
Wells → accuse → claims
“If they really care, the test is simple here, they should bring an amendment, not a slogan to ‘kill the bill’,” Wells told ABC radio on Wednesday. asserted
Wells → care → Wednesday
Another Chaney amendment accepted by Labor would require the algorithm opt-out features to be “accessible, easy to use” and “prominently available” on platforms,amid concerns that social media giants may offer only small or hard-to-find features. uncertain
giants → accept → features
The bill now moves to the Senate, where the Greens have set up an inquiry to probe the laws due to report back in late November. asserted
Greens → move → November
Senator Sarah Hanson-Young backed a digital duty of care, calling for the government’s legislation to be strengthened asserted
legislation → back → care
The Greens want Australians to have the right to pursue private legal action against platforms and for penalties to be increased. asserted
penalties → want → platforms
“Australians also need an external complaints pathway, free from the profit-driven whims of ‘big tech’s’ content moderation,” she said. asserted
she → need → moderation
Independent MP Sophie Scamps had proposed changes to the bill to expand the remit of the telecommunications industry ombudsman. asserted
Scamps → propose → ombudsman
She said such a watchdog – which does not currently exist for big tech – would allow ordinary social media users to seek remedies to their accounts being hacked or inaccessible, including compensation, and investigate broader issues to name and shame companies behaving badly. asserted
accounts → say → companies
Labor did not accept this amendment in the lower house and Wells declined to voice support for such an idea, but the Greens will push for such a reform in their Senate negotiations. asserted
Greens → accept → negotiations
Cynthia Gebert, the telecommunications industry ombudsman, said her office would be well placed to carry out such a role for big tech. asserted
office → say → tech
She said such roles were funded by the industries they regulate and that expanding its remit could be financed by big tech. uncertain
expanding → say → tech
“There are some real strengths in the DDOC [digital duty of care] because it’s putting the onus on platforms to make things safe … but I think the area that needs to be strengthened is giving people somewhere to go if they can’t get their complaints resolved with the platform,” Gebert told Guardian Australia. asserted
Gebert → be → Australia
“It risks leaving Australians in the safe place they are now, where they get automated responses or escalation procedures that don’t go anywhere.” asserted
that → risk → responses
Gebert said the government should make it mandatory for big tech to be part of an ombudsman scheme, saying it would “hold industry to account and drive system improvement”. asserted
it → say → improvement
“[The telecommunications industry ombudsman] can help with your Telstra account, but we can’t help with your Gmail account. asserted
we → help → account
Consumers come to us sometimes and ask, ‘why this, not that?’,” she said. asserted
she → come → us
“We want to help but don’t have the powers to do so now.” asserted
We → want → powers
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support