Trump Learns You Can’t Spell Mail Without an L

The Bulwark · collected 2026-09-15 · by William Kristol commentary
Read the original at The Bulwark ↗

Summary

The Supreme Court has blocked President Trump's attempt to interfere with mail-in ballots, dealing a significant blow to his efforts to manipulate upcoming elections. The decision was seen as a major rebuke to Trump’s scheme, which aimed to destabilize state voting systems by giving the U.S. Postal Service and its leadership control over ballot delivery decisions. The article emphasizes that while the court's conservative majority has sometimes favored Trump, this particular ruling undermines his last chance at influencing midterm election outcomes.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
95
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
14%
13 of 95 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly left
expected in commentary, which argues a position
Correction & hedging signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
unclustered
not grouped into a story yet
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.65 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.65 for article 10974 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-16

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 19% hedged 10 of 54 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of President Trump's stance on AI and his broader political messaging, not the same specific incident.”
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 27 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles describe different time periods of President Trump's statements and activities regarding AI, with Article A covering his rant on Monday and Article B summarizing his stance over a subsequent day.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles describe different days of commentary and activities by President Trump on AI, with Article A focusing on his September 14th social media post about AI being a 'sick conspiracy' against it, while Article B describes his actions and statements on September 15th.”

Publisher

The Bulwark · 135 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

William Kristol
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Next, we suspect he will launch into caps-lock tirades against ice cream, puppies, and the Beatles.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Trump Learns You Can’t Spell Mail Without an L
🔮 Well, how many issues could put Steve Bannon, Bernie Sanders, and an industry whistleblower all on the same D.C. stage?
2026-09-14 · assertive framing · AI Is a Test of Our Maturity. *Gulp*
🔮 Bill Kristol and Richard North Patterson trace how America went from a seemingly conventional political system to Trump’s second term, where the institutions and powerful people expected to serve as guardrails have often failed to stand up to him.
🔮 Happy Labor Day to all, including the Radical Left Lunatics, Communists, and Dumocrats who will do anything possible to destroy our Country.
2026-09-08 · assertive framing · Trump Wants to Exhaust Us. He’s Failing.
🔮 They consider how the media environment has changed, what Democrats can learn from Republican political infrastructure, how a broad pro-democracy coalition can manage internal disagreements, and what a successful strategy against Trumpism could look like.
More on this subject from William Kristol
Trump Wants to Exhaust Us. He’s Failing.
2026-09-08 · The Bulwark · 52% similar
All 7 articles by William Kristol →

Topics

Democratic SCOTUS Substack YouTube the Supreme Court’s

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 10× Alito PERSON · 3× Court ORG · 3× States GPE · 3× Andrew Egger PERSON · 1× Ben Parker PERSON · 1× Bill PERSON · 1× SCOTUS ORG · 1× Substack ORG · 1× YouTube ORG · 1×

Narrative

In a series of ever-more unhinged social media posts, and then in a call into a pro-AI conference in Los Angeles, Trump assured us all that he had everything under control, that all the warnings and concerns about AI are a “HOAX,” and that there is a “SICK conspiracy going on against AI and Data Centers.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 Next, we suspect he will launch into caps-lock tirades against ice cream, puppies, and the Beatles.
2026-09-16 · The Bulwark
Trump Learns You Can’t Spell Mail Without an L · assertive framing

Claims (95 extracted, 13 hedged)

President Trump spent much of yesterday posting about his unlimited support for AI development and data-center construction and calling criticism of it a “hoax.” asserted
Trump → spend → it
It’s rare to see a politician stake his ground on the 20 side of an 80–20 issue. asserted
politician → ’ → issue
But that’s our president! asserted
that → ’ → ?
Next, we suspect he will launch into caps-lock tirades against ice cream, puppies, and the Beatles. asserted
he → suspect → cream
SCOTUS Dashes Trump’s Last, Best Midterm Hope by Andrew Egger asserted
SCOTUS → dash → Egger
Yes, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has sometimes let Donald Trump get away with too much. asserted
Trump → let → much
And yes, there are still myriad ways Trump could try to tamper with the upcoming midterms—and it’s all but certain that he’ll try to spin any Democratic victories as fraudulent, at least in the minds of his own base. uncertain
he → be → base
For this one moment, though, I’m hitting pause on caring about any of that. asserted
I → hit → that
Last night’s Supreme Court decision blocking Trump’s ridiculous anti-mail-in ballots scheme was a massive rebuke of the president, a giant wrench in his plans to monkey with elections, and the death of his last, best hope to stave off the coming blue wave. asserted
decision → block → wave
Before we turn back to the future dangers, let’s sit and savor it a little. asserted
’s → turn → it
Covering this scheme—which we’ve been writing about for months—it’s been difficult to figure out exactly how anxious to be about it. asserted
it → cover → it
On the one hand, it seemed deeply unlikely all along that it would succeed in court. asserted
it → seem → court
It was simply too outlandish, too much “one weird trick to seize control of elections”: a brazen attempt to destabilize states’ mail-in voting systems by giving the U.S. Postal Service and its Trump-lackey leadership unprecedented control over which mail-in ballots to deliver and which ones to refuse. asserted
It → seize → ones
On the other hand, the damage the scheme would have done if Trump had been allowed to proceed was far too massive to ignore. asserted
Trump → do → hand
Overnight, we could have been looking at a genuine constitutional crisis, with blue states forced to choose between handing troves of voter data over to Trump’s government or carrying out their elections without the use of the mail—which, of course, is what Trump has wanted all along. uncertain
Trump → look → what
Even if they had agreed to give over their data, there were screaming warning signs that mail-in voters could be disenfranchised en masse anyway. uncertain
voters → agree → masse
Justice Samuel Alito, joined in dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas, hand-waves the possibility of this chaos on the thinnest imaginable grounds. asserted
Alito → join → grounds
First, Alito argued, “the States disagree about the nature of these effects.” asserted
States → argue → effects
In effect: What are all these blue states complaining about? asserted
states → complain → What
The red states don’t see a compliance issue here. asserted
states → see → issue
Second, Alito blames the possibility of all this chaos unfolding just before the midterms on the plaintiff states—for having had the temerity to sue over Trump’s ridiculous order in the first place. asserted
Alito → blame → place
“In April, the plaintiff States sued to challenge the President’s internal directive to subordinates mandating a rulemaking,” the justice huffed. asserted
justice → sue → rulemaking
“For months, this litigation cast a cloud over the Government’s ability to issue a final rule. asserted
litigation → cast → rule
The plaintiff States cannot claim the timing of the rule tilts the equities in their favor when they, and courts hearing their claims, are responsible for so much of the delay.” uncertain
they → claim → delay
It’s clownish stuff, but who cares? asserted
who → ’ → ?
Don’t let the trolls ruin your day, that’s what I always say. asserted
I → let → what
Alito and Thomas’s “my president, right or wrong” shtick is isolated on the Court, which handed Trump a growing stack of major Ls this term, stomping on his “Liberation Day” tariffs, upholding birthright citizenship, and now kicking down a tentpole of his election strategy. asserted
which → isolate → strategy
It makes no sense to treat this Court as a feckless rubber-stamp body for Trump, then to turn around and scoff off their rebukes of his most unconstitutional actions as easy calls. asserted
It → make → calls
The easy calls are the most important ones to get right, and Trump is far better hemmed in by them than he would be otherwise. asserted
he → get → them
The fight continues, of course. asserted
fight → continue → course
As the New York Times notes, the president’s other plans to bully state election officials and to root around in state voter rolls continue unabated. asserted
plans → note → rolls
And of course, the 2020-style playbook is still right there on the table: Trump is all but guaranteed to decry any Republican losses—of which we expect there to be many—as inherently illegitimate, and he could well lean on quisling allies like House Speaker Mike Johnson to try to block new Democratic majorities from taking office. uncertain
he → guarantee → office
One constitutional crisis averted today is no guarantee we won’t get another one tomorrow. asserted
we → avert → one
But one constitutional crisis averted today is still cause for momentary relief, reassurance, invigoration, and celebration. asserted
crisis → avert → relief
The bastards couldn’t manage to pull this one off. asserted
bastards → manage → one
They’ll keep grinding. asserted
They → keep → ?
Whom should you listen to on the issue of artificial intelligence? asserted
you → listen → intelligence
You could listen to the American public. uncertain
You → listen → public
Back in 2025, before this year’s reports of incidents of AI going rogue, polling from the University of Massachusetts Amherst revealed widespread public unease regarding AI. asserted
polling → go → AI
Fifty-eight percent of Americans said then that AI should be strictly regulated by the government. asserted
AI → say → government
…and 55 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support