A Coles worker who tried to stop two suspected thieves at a neighbouring Liquorland store will receive $6500 in compensation from the supermarket chain after he was unfairly dismissed for breaching its workplace rules.
asserted
he → try → rules
Fair Work Commission deputy president Judith Wright said there was a valid reason for the man’s dismissal but found it was harsh and unreasonable given his good employment record and because he did not knowingly and deliberately breach the rules.
asserted
he → say → rules
The man, who was a casual team member at a Coles store in the Sydney suburb of Pyrmont, saw two suspected shoplifters walking past the self-checkouts during an evening shift in December last year.
asserted
shoplifters → see → December
He had previously crossed paths with the two suspects, who he said were well known in the Pyrmont store for stealing, verbally abusing and physically assaulting other employees.
asserted
he → cross → employees
The man said he asked them not to steal but saw the suspects opening cooler bags and walking into an adjacent Liquorland store – a chain owned by Coles – and that he asked them not to enter because they were underage.
asserted
they → say → them
However, the suspects allegedly ignored him and placed several four-packs of alcohol into their bags.
uncertain
suspects → ignore → bags
He confronted them again as they walked towards the exit, after which one of the suspects threw a four-pack of alcohol on the cement outside.
asserted
one → confront → cement
A staff member in Liquorland, who was working alone, called the police.
asserted
who → work → police
The man attempted to restrain one of the suspects, holding her around the shoulders and upper body and moving with her around the store as she pulled against him for about two minutes and 20 seconds before he realised the police would not arrive for some time and let her go.
asserted
her → attempt → time
The man checked the Liquorland staff member was all right and arranged for Coles staff to help with cleaning.
asserted
staff → check → cleaning
A few hours later, police arrived, and the man said he was informed the suspected shoplifters were known to the police.
asserted
shoplifters → arrive → police
The man’s actions breached three rules in Coles’ code of conduct, including requirements for staff to avoid putting themselves in a situation where they could be hurt; to always keep a safe distance from an aggressor; and to never follow anyone out of a shop.
uncertain
they → breach → shop
The man said his “sudden impulse” to stop the suspects was out of frustration and a lack of action by Coles in preventing repeat offenders.
asserted
impulse → say → offenders
He also said he would not have detained them if he was in Coles, and had never done so in his 10 years working there.
asserted
he → say → years
Because he was on a break, and outside his place of employment, he believed the action he took was acceptable.
asserted
he → believe → employment
Two days later, the Pyrmont Coles store manager told the man he had been suspended because CCTV footage showed him having a physical altercation, and that he was not allowed back into the store.
asserted
he → tell → store
He was denied a union delegate and documentation, which he requested.
asserted
he → deny → which
The following day, the man approached the manager with a union delegate just inside the front automatic doors of the Pyrmont store and requested a discussion regarding the allegations with the delegate present, as well as a copy of the suspension script.
asserted
man → approach → script
The manager said she felt “anxious and a bit scared” because of what she had seen in the CCTV footage, asked him to leave and eventually handed him the script.
asserted
she → say → script
The man and the delegate left the store shortly after receiving and reading the documentation.
asserted
man → leave → documentation
In a disciplinary meeting, the man was shown the CCTV footage and read out the allegations against him. The following day, the man provided a typed response to the allegations.
asserted
man → show → allegations
The regional manager who reviewed this response said the man provided “irrelevant information, did not explain what he was thinking or why he acted in the way that he did, and seemed to believe he did not do anything wrong”, ultimately dismissing him.
asserted
he → review → him
Wright said while it was “understandable” that the man felt frustrated by the suspects’ actions, Coles had a valid reason for dismissing him because he had breached its code of conduct – which applies to all situations where there is a connection to Coles.
asserted
which → say → Coles
However, Wright noted the suspension was poorly handled by the store manager who denied him a support person and did not provide him with written information about the suspension despite it being requested, making his breach of the direction not to return to the Coles store an invalid reason for dismissal.
“If this information had been provided, it would not have been necessary for [the man] to attend the workplace the following day,” she said, noting it was unusual for an organisation as large as Coles not to have prepared this documentation.
asserted
organisation → note → documentation
“It is not clear whether [the man] knew that Coles regarded any breach of this requirement [not to return to the store] to be a serious matter …
asserted
breach → know → store
The provision of the direction in writing would have emphasised the importance of the direction and the consequences of contravening it.”
asserted
provision → emphasise → it
Wright said the man’s failure to acknowledge that he breached Coles’ policies meant he should not be reinstated to his job.
asserted
he → say → job
However, she said that because it was a one-off, isolated incident where the man did not “knowingly and deliberately” breach the policies, and because he had a long period of unblemished service with Coles, he should be compensated $6,483.51 for the harsh and unreasonable dismissal.
asserted
he → say → dismissal
A spokesperson for the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association said the case was “an unfortunate example of the real risks surrounding shops and stores every day”.
asserted
case → say → shops
“It is just one of the reasons the SDA has pushed, successfully, for tougher measures and penalties to protect retail workers from the rising tide of violence and abuse,” they said.
asserted
they → push → violence
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion.
asserted
newsletter → deliver → stories
The Aporia
