Why Trump will not yield to an AI slowdown

The Straits Times · collected 2026-09-15 · by Bhagyashree Garekar
Read the original at The Straits Times ↗

Summary

President Donald Trump has dismissed calls for slowing down artificial intelligence development despite warnings from tech leaders about potential risks. During a trip to Ireland, Trump stated that the US must lead China in AI and sees no need for regulation beyond his role as president. Tech industry CEOs like Anthropic’s Dario Amodei have urged for safety standards and cooperation among democratic governments, while competitors such as OpenAI’s Sam Altman support this call. In response, Trump questioned their motives and dismissed the risks of AI as a hoax.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
55
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
9%
5 of 55 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
58.8
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
39
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · source text last changed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

President Trump dismissed growing concerns over the risks of artificial intelligence (AI), asserting that a strong and smart leader like himself is sufficient to guard against potential dangers. In posts on Truth Social, he claimed there was a "sick conspiracy" aimed at AI and data centers, suggesting such efforts only benefit China in its quest for global tech dominance. Trump argued the US already leads China in AI development and has significant regulatory power over AI companies. This stance comes amid calls from leading AI researchers and companies like Anthropic and OpenAI to slow down AI development due to increasing risks. The disagreement over AI regulation is set against the backdrop of an upcoming official summit between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, scheduled for September 24 in Washington, where AI development is expected to be a key topic of discussion.

Written for “Trump AI Rants Condemning Critics” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 38 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.65 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.65 for article 10779 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-16

Story

📰 Trump AI Rants Condemning Critics
Politics · 39 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 53 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe President Donald Trump's stance on AI regulation at the same time, opposing calls for a slowdown and emphasizing geopolitical competition with China.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy debates but do not describe the same specific incident or meeting.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 21% hedged 5 of 24 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe different events: one is about CEOs agreeing to slow AI development, while the other is about President Trump rejecting such a slowdown.”
The Intercept
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 15 of 431 📰 publisher trust 97
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy under President Trump's administration but describe separate events.”
September 13, 2026 different event · 95%
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 15% hedged 10 of 65
“Article A describes Dario Amodei's publication of an essay on AI safety concerns, while Article B discusses President Trump's stance against slowing down AI development.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 23% hedged 5 of 22 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy under Trump and do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
NPR
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 23% hedged 6 of 26 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles describe different events: one is about China's response to Anthropic CEO's call, and the other is about Trump's stance on AI development.”
Times of India
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 13% hedged 2 of 15 📰 publisher trust 94
“While both articles discuss Trump's stance on AI leadership and China, they describe different instances of his statements with distinct dates and contexts.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe Trump's stance on artificial intelligence regulation during the same timeframe.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 3 of 22 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles discuss President Trump's stance on AI regulation on consecutive days, with similar rhetoric about not yielding to fears and maintaining technological superiority over China.”

Publisher

The Straits Times · 532 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-13
Russia hits Ukrainian-Polish border area, Kyiv says

Who wrote this

Bhagyashree Garekar
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Why Trump will not yield to an AI slowdown AI generated PHILADELPHIA –
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Why Trump will not yield to an AI slowdown
🔮 That may evoke sunsets and beaches in a resort town.
🔮 News analysis Trump’s war on tariff evasion could turn into a battle over global manufacturing AI generated PHILADELPHIA –
Also by Bhagyashree Garekar
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Anthropic China Ireland PHILADELPHIA Truth Social

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 6× Amodei ORG · 3× China GPE · 3× America GPE · 2× Anthropic ORG · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Ireland GPE · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× PHILADELPHIA GPE · 1×

Narrative

Floating about are loose proposals like seeking to address catastrophic risks involving biological or nuclear threats emanating from AI or banning superintelligent AI or devising ways to ensure testing and oversight of the most advanced AI systems.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 Why Trump will not yield to an AI slowdown AI generated PHILADELPHIA –
2026-09-16 · The Straits Times
Why Trump will not yield to an AI slowdown · assertive framing

Claims (55 extracted, 5 hedged)

Why Trump will not yield to an AI slowdown AI generated PHILADELPHIA – asserted
AI → yield → slowdown
In the middle of cascading fears of artificial intelligence running amok and one day posing grave danger to human society, President Donald Trump has made a clear choice: the US must not slow down. asserted
US → cascade → choice
“Whoever wins AI, wins,” he said, defying calls from tech industry leaders to regulate cutting-edge AI for the sake of safety and framing the choice as a geopolitical question of beating China. asserted
he → win → China
“We’re leading China in AI. asserted
We → lead → AI
We’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way,” he told reporters during a trip to Ireland. asserted
he → ’re → Ireland
In a flurry of comments and social media posts, Trump has also scoffed at the world’s most influential AI companies, dismissing their concerns as “a hoax”. asserted
Trump → scoff → hoax
The only safeguard the nation needs is a “strong and smart (high IQ) president,” he said on Truth Social. asserted
he → need → Social
The question of regulating AI came to the fore after Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei, the developer of Claude AI, warned in unusually specific terms on Sept 12 that AI could be capable within six to 12 months of coordinating swarms of autonomous agents powerful enough to take over the internet. uncertain
AI → regulate → internet
It is time to stop competing for technical supremacy, accept outside scrutiny and jointly slow down to focus more on safety before going any further, Amodei said in a lengthy essay. asserted
Amodei → stop → essay
Voluntary action by a single company would not be enough, he said, asking for safety standards coordinated among democratic governments and for negotiations with “authoritarian powers” like China. asserted
he → say → China
Against the backdrop of a series of hacks in recent months that showed AI agents can conspire to deceive humans, Amodei’s call gained surprising support from some of his biggest rivals – OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis. asserted
call → show → rivals
xAI’s Elon Musk and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella also indicated agreement. asserted
Musk → indicate → agreement
As the idea of a slowdown began trending, Trump spoke louder. asserted
Trump → begin → slowdown
He questioned the acumen of the tech CEOs calling for government oversight. asserted
He → question → oversight
“When, in the history of business, did anyone see the leaders of an industry call for regulation that, if strongly implemented, will drive them into oblivion and bankruptcy?” Trump said on social media. asserted
Trump → see → media
“It’s a hoax,” he insisted in a live five-minute phone call with Nvidia chief Jensen Huang, who was speaking at a Sept 14 conference in Los Angeles. asserted
who → ’ → Angeles
“The robots are not going to be taking over the world. asserted
robots → go → world
That’s not going to happen.” asserted
That → go → ?
Huang, who heads the world’s top company designing advanced AI chips, is on the other side of the debate and has dismissed AI risks as overblown. asserted
who → head → risks
Trump’s former AI czar David Sacks, the Silicon Valley investor who has shaped much of the administration’s AI policy, also reacted with hostility. asserted
who → shape → hostility
Posting on social media, he said Amodei’s call smacked of “regulatory capture” or an attempt to seal in an early mover advantage through rules that leave newer rivals hobbled. asserted
that → post → rivals
AI companies can choose to act responsibly on their own, he wrote on X. “If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible. asserted
I → choose → decision
But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission,” he posted on Sept 13. asserted
he → pretend → Sept
“Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. asserted
motivation → stop → all
You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. asserted
products → face → cyberattack
” Call for safety timeout hits wall in Congress Trump, who plans to summon AI executives for a meeting in the coming days, has a clear preference for light-touch regulation of AI, which he sees as supercharging the US economy. asserted
he → hit → economy
Soon after taking over in January 2025, he signed an executive order revoking a Biden administration directive on AI oversight and ordered his agencies to develop a plan to sustain America’s global AI dominance. asserted
he → take → dominance
Six months later, “America’s AI Action Plan” provided a blueprint for accelerating innovation while reducing federal scrutiny. asserted
Plan → provide → scrutiny
In June 2026, Trump signed another executive order that left it up to companies to decide whether they want their new AI models reviewed by the government. asserted
models → sign → government
But on national security and cybersecurity issues, the White House has proven it has the “kill switch”. asserted
it → prove → switch
It banned Anthropic’s advanced Mythos 5 and Fable 5 models for a couple of weeks in June 2026, over a fear that their cybersecurity guard rails could be circumvented. uncertain
rails → ban → fear
It had to use export control laws because there are no AI-specific safety laws. asserted
It → have → laws
US lawmakers, politically divided on AI regulations, have not attempted any comprehensive statute either. asserted
lawmakers → divide → statute
With the midterm elections less than seven weeks away, they are under growing political pressure to act as public sentiment on AI and data centres sours. asserted
sentiment → grow → AI
Something should be done, the congressional leaders say, but there are no firm plans or the will to regulate. asserted
leaders → do → ?
Floating about are loose proposals like seeking to address catastrophic risks involving biological or nuclear threats emanating from AI or banning superintelligent AI or devising ways to ensure testing and oversight of the most advanced AI systems. asserted
proposals → float → systems
It is also a factor that Congress remains technically under-equipped and struggles with tough questions like who should regulate AI and how the rules can be enforced. asserted
rules → remain → AI
Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican ally of Trump, has stressed corporate obligation rather than a legal regime. asserted
Johnson → stress → regime
Companies have “an obvious corporate responsibility that the people who are creating these models have to ensure that their products are safe”, he has said. asserted
he → have → models
Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the top Democrat in the House, has shuffled blame. asserted
Jeffries → shuffle → blame
…and 15 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support