US, allies and China vie for influence through Pacific security deals

Read the original at South China Morning Post ↗
Cite

Seth, N. (2026, October 23). US, allies and China vie for influence through Pacific security deals. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/us/article/3371989/us-allies-and-china-vie-influence-through-pacific-security-deals

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

South China Morning Post · collected 2026-10-23 · by Nayan Seth

Quick Summary

A new interactive mapping tool from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington highlights how the US, its allies, and China are competing for influence in Pacific island nations through various security agreements. The tool tracks 56 such arrangements involving 14 Pacific countries and major players like the US, Australia, New Zealand, China, and Taiwan. It categorizes these agreements into three types based on their level of commitment: defence treaty allies, formal security agreements without defence guarantees, and non-binding cooperation only. This strategic competition is particularly evident under former President Joe Biden's administration as Beijing focuses on expanding policing ties while Washington maintains traditional defense pacts.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, released an interactive mapping tool highlighting 56 security arrangements between 14 Pacific island countries and major powers including the US, Australia, New Zealand, China, and Taiwan. This tool aims to illustrate the strategic competition in the region where Beijing and Washington are vying for influence, especially since former President Joe Biden's administration. The matrix categorizes these agreements into three levels based on their significance: defence treaties, formal security agreements, and other forms of cooperation like policing ties and maritime surveillance partnerships.

Written for “Pacific Security Deals Competition” on 2026-10-24, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 103052 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-24

Story

📰 Pacific Security Deals Competition
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 20% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects of US-China relations without referring to the same specific incident.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 25 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A focuses on Vanuatu's expectation of reducing China's police presence after a deal with Australia, while Article B discusses broader strategic competition in the Pacific among multiple countries.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 21 📰 publisher trust 61
“Article A describes war games simulating conflict scenarios, while Article B discusses strategic competition and security deals in the Pacific.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects of strategic competition between China and the US, with Article A focusing on a senator's warning about military spending and Article B detailing security deals in the Pacific.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different geopolitical issues: one focuses on China's role in the Arctic, while the other discusses strategic competition between China and the US across Pacific islands.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 26% hedged 9 of 34 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles describe different geopolitical events involving distinct sets of countries and organizations.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 24 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A focuses on a specific contradiction by Vanuatu's minister regarding China's police presence, while Article B discusses broader strategic competition and security deals between China and the US in the Pacific islands.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 50% hedged 3 of 6 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects of geopolitical interactions in the Pacific region, with Article A focusing on the Philippines' energy crisis and potential US military ties, while Article B covers broader strategic competition between China and the US across Pacific islands.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 18% hedged 8 of 45 📰 publisher trust 71
“The articles discuss different regions and dynamics of international relations involving security partnerships.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
5
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
1 of 5 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
South China Morning Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

South China Morning Post · 2954 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nayan Seth
20 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 ExclusiveUS-China negotiators race to nail down concrete deals as Shenzhen Apec looms Progress made in investment and trade talks ahead of Xi and Trump meeting, but complexities remain, multiple sources said Multiple sources told the South China Morning Post that intense negotiations would continue in coming weeks, with Washington and Beijing still facing hurdles to finalising a complex package of institutional frameworks and economic agreements.
🔮 ‘China already has spies’ at US AI labs, claims ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon alleges Beijing can close any technological gap with the US as it has ways to ‘steal our progress at any time and catch up’ “Right now, if we just stopped, they would try and catch up.
🔮 US accuses mainland China of targeting Taiwan leader’s family in surveillance case FBI says US citizen Zhang Wanying filmed William Lai Ching-te’s son’s home and vehicles in Seattle before trying to fly to Shanghai The FBI accused her of surveilling the Taiwanese leader’s son and his family in Seattle last year, filming their home and vehicles and sharing the footage with handlers in China.
🔮 Greer says no specific timeline set for enforcing US-China Board of Trade United States Trade Representative confirms recommendations must go through a legal process before implementation of new economic initiative Speaking on the sidelines of the Group of 20 Trade Ministers’ meeting in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Greer said the tariff reductions under the mechanism were “a policy outcome” and that the recommendations would have to go through a legal process before implementation.
🔮 Deliverables on trade Both sides also finalised the Board of Trade mechanism and are set to announce non-sensitive sectors and products capped at US$30 billion each for tariff reduction.
🔮 ExclusiveFissures over US investments stall plans for Chinese business leaders to join Xi visit With the window for travel narrowing by the hour, uncertainty surrounds the inclusion of corporate leaders in China’s delegation The window for travel is narrowing by the hour for these Chinese business leaders, with Xi expected to arrive in Washington by Wednesday. The investment forum was one of the deliverables from Xi and his US counterpart Donald Trump’s last summit in Beijing in May, which has since stalled.
🔮 Last week, the South China Morning Post reported that Washington and Beijing would fold AI discussions into a broader economic meeting.
🔮 ExclusiveUS weighs delaying Taiwan arms sales until after Apec and G20 summits Sources say the decision is expected to be a compromise between Donald Trump, Washington’s China hawks and Taipei’s lobbyists One source said Trump was considering various options to postpone the signing of Taiwan arms sales, but the final outcome would be a “compromise between him, the China hawks and Taiwan’s lobbyists”. “President Trump has considered delaying the [Taiwan] arms sales decision till end 2028 or January 2029, that is, towards the end of his current term.
🔮 ExclusiveChina, US may unveil measures to boost military ties when Xi visits Washington Two sides have been discussing ways to improve communication channels, according to sources familiar with the talks Another item that is being discussed, and a possible deliverable, is restarting the arms-control talks that were suspended in 2024 over US weapons sales to Taiwan, with the dialogue potentially including military personnel.
🔮 While purchasers of Russian energy are not explicitly named in the bill, it is set to target major buyers such as China and India, while potentially exempting countries including Japan, France, Hungary and Belgium, which source smaller shares from Russia and are taking steps to reduce their reliance.
Also by Nayan Seth
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 20 articles by Nayan Seth →

Topics

Beijing CSIS China Washington the Centre for Strategic and International Studies

Subjects

China GPE · 3× Washington GPE · 3× Beijing GPE · 2× Australia GPE · 1× CSIS ORG · 1× Joe Biden PERSON · 1× New Zealand GPE · 1× Taiwan GPE · 1× the Centre for Strategic and International Studies ORG · 1×

Narrative

The tool details 56 security arrangements among 14 Pacific island countries and the US, Australia, New Zealand, mainland China and Taiwan in a bid to map out linkages in a region that has long seen Beijing and Washington spar for influence, particularly under the administration of former president Joe Biden.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-24
2026-10-24 · South China Morning Post
US, allies and China vie for influence through Pacific security deals · assertive framing

Claims (5 extracted, 1 hedged)

US, allies and China vie for influence through Pacific security deals asserted
US → vie → deals
New mapping tool highlights contrasting approaches, with Beijing expanding policing ties as Washington maintains defence pacts Strategic competition between China and the US and its allies is intensifying across the Pacific islands, with both sides pursuing a growing range of security agreements to expand their influence, according to an interactive mapping tool released this week by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank. uncertain
sides → highlight → Studies
The tool details 56 security arrangements among 14 Pacific island countries and the US, Australia, New Zealand, mainland China and Taiwan in a bid to map out linkages in a region that has long seen Beijing and Washington spar for influence, particularly under the administration of former president Joe Biden. asserted
Beijing → detail → Biden
The matrix assigns different weights to treaty-level defence commitments, status of forces agreements, maritime surveillance arrangements, policing cooperation and memorandums of understanding. asserted
matrix → assign → understanding
The mapping tool classifies them into three categories based on the level and nature of the security ties: “defence treaty ally”, “formal security agreement” without defence guarantees and “non-binding cooperation only”. asserted
tool → classify → guarantees
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support