ATC replaces state counsel in security breach case after Imaan, Hadi object to appointment

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Asad, M. (2026, October 22). ATC replaces state counsel in security breach case after Imaan, Hadi object to appointment. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2039035/atc-replaces-state-counsel-in-security-breach-case-after-imaan-hadi-object-to-appointment

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-10-22 · by Malik Asad

Quick Summary

An anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi canceled the appointment of state counsel Taimoor Janjua after lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha objected to his involvement due to past conduct issues. The case involves allegations that Mazari-Hazir and Chattha disrupted a security route for an international cricket team in 2024, leading to their indictment on October 7. Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra appointed Atif Mehmood as the new state counsel after dismissing Janjua's challenge to the accusations against him. The court scheduled further hearings for Friday and warned that cross-examination would proceed without delay if legal representation issues persist.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-22, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

An anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Rawalpindi on Thursday canceled the appointment of state counsel Taimoor Janjua in a security breach case against lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha. The couple, who are accused of disrupting an international cricket team’s security route and inciting public unrest in 2024, objected to Janjua's appointment due to his involvement as state counsel in another case involving them. ATC Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra named Atif Mehmood as the replacement for Janjua, who had been appointed just a day prior. The security breach case includes charges under sections 188 (disobedience of an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant), 341 (wrongful restraint), 506 (criminal intimidation), 353 (assault or use of criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging their official duty), and 186 (obstructing a public servant in the performance of official duties).

Written for “ATC Replaces State Counsel In Security Breach Case” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 99503 · logged 2026-10-22

Story

📰 ATC Replaces State Counsel In Security Breach Case
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 4 of 42 📰 publisher trust 71
“The articles describe different stages of legal proceedings in the security breach case, not the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
31
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
3 of 31 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
71/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
10
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2073 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Malik Asad
38 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Meanwhile, no prosecution witness could be cross-examined during Thursday’s hearing amid the dispute over the state counsel’s appointment.
🔮 Justice Malik remarked with a smile, “In that case, you might as well remove our badges too, as we are also currently serving as additional judges.”
🔮 Describing the charge as the foundation of a trial, Azad maintained that any defect in its framing would undermine the legality of the subsequent proceedings.
🔮 He warned that they could face imprisonment if it was not presented before the court.
🔮 On the application filed by the defence, he said, “I have received your applications; I will issue an order regarding this.
🔮 The court observed that Barrister Gohar could have submitted his response in writing.
🔮 Lawyers representing human rights activists and lawyers Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha, along with Shireen Mazari, boycotted proceedings of an anti-terrorism court on Wednesday after the judge decided to record prosecution witnesses’ statements despite the defence’s request to defer the exercise until they could meet the accused.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Lawyers of Imaan, Hadi boycott ATC proceedings
🔮 The defence sought an adjournment, informing the court that the Oct 10 order was also being challenged before the Islamabad High Court. “If your petition is accepted by the high court, the proceedings in this court will come to an end,” the judge remarked.
🔮 If the framing of charges is set aside, the entire proceedings will come to an end,” Judge Sipra remarked, observing that the challenge before the high court did not automatically prevent the trial court from proceeding.
🔮 If the framing of charges is set aside, the entire proceedings will come to an end,” Judge Sipra remarked, observing that the challenge before the high court did not automatically prevent the trial court from proceeding.
Also by Malik Asad
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 38 articles by Malik Asad →

Topics

ATC Adiala IHC RAWALPINDI the Islamabad High Court

Subjects

Hadi PERSON · 8× Imaan PERSON · 6× Janjua PERSON · 6× ATC ORG · 2× Adiala GPE · 2× IHC ORG · 2× RAWALPINDI GPE · 2× Hadi Ali Chattha PERSON · 1× Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir PERSON · 1× Taimoor Janjua PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The FIR included sections 188 (disobedience of an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant), 341 (wrongful restraint), 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), 353 (assault or use of criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging their official duty) and 186 (obstructing a public servant in the performance of official duties).
framing: assertive · carried by 10 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-05
🔮 Meanwhile, no prosecution witness could be cross-examined during Thursday’s hearing amid the dispute over the state counsel’s appointment.

Claims (31 extracted, 3 hedged)

An anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Thursday cancelled the appointment of state counsel Taimoor Janjua in a security breach case against lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha, after the accused objected to his past conduct in another case. asserted
accused → cancel → case
Imaan and her husband, Hadi, are facing a jail trial in a 2024 case pertaining to the alleged disruption of an international cricket team’s security route and incitement to public unrest. asserted
Imaan → face → unrest
The couple, accused of removing barriers from the route, was indicted on Oct 7. asserted
couple → accuse → Oct
ATC Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra presides over the proceedings at Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail. asserted
Sipra → preside → jail
Hearing the case on Thursday, Judge Sipra named Atif Mehmood as the replacement for Janjua, who was appointed as the state counsel just a day ago to conduct cross-examination of prosecution witnesses after the lawyer couple’s counsel failed to do so during proceedings. asserted
counsel → hear → proceedings
During the proceedings, Imaan told the court that Janjua had previously been appointed as state counsel in another case involving her, referring to the controversial social media posts case in which they were sentenced in January. asserted
they → tell → January
Hadi also raised objections to his conduct, alleging that the lawyer had told people that he had received Rs500,000 and completed cross-examination in a single day. asserted
he → raise → day
In response, Janjua challenged the allegation and retorted that the accused should accompany him to a private case outside the court to see whether he performed his professional duties properly. asserted
he → challenge → duties
The exchange prompted defence counsel Advocate Aimal Khan Mandokhail to question the state counsel’s role, asking him whether he was representing the accused or working against them. asserted
he → prompt → them
The judge also expressed displeasure over Janjua’s conduct and questioned his manner of appearing before the court. asserted
judge → express → court
“Has no one ever taught you how to appear in court?” the judge asked the state counsel. asserted
judge → teach → counsel
Then, Imaan informed the court that she and Hadi did not need a state counsel as they already had their own lawyers. asserted
they → inform → lawyers
Hadi explained that their lawyers were frequently occupied with other cases at the Islamabad High Court (IHC), while the trial court had scheduled daily hearings at Adiala, making it difficult for them to attend every proceeding. asserted
them → explain → proceeding
Meanwhile, no prosecution witness could be cross-examined during Thursday’s hearing amid the dispute over the state counsel’s appointment. uncertain
witness → cros → appointment
The court directed the prosecution witnesses to appear again on Friday and warned the accused that the cross-examination would proceed without further delay. asserted
examination → direct → delay
Addressing Imaan and Hadi, the judge directed them to ensure that their respective lawyers conducted the cross-examination at the next hearing. asserted
lawyers → address → hearing
He added that if their lawyers failed to do so, newly appointed state counsel Mehmood would undertake the exercise. asserted
Mehmood → add → exercise
The court adjourned further proceedings until 9am tomorrow (Friday). asserted
court → adjourn → 9
Advocate Janjua had previously been appointed to represent Imaan and Hadi in a controversial social media posts case — a development to which the couple had objected. asserted
couple → appoint → which
He had shown up in an Islamabad district and sessions court during a November hearing after state-appointed Advocate Shakeel Jatt refused to cross-examine the prosecution’s witnesses in the case, saying that he could not “ask questions dictated” to him. uncertain
he → show → him
At a December hearing, Hadi had informed the court that a no-confidence application had been filed against Advocate Janjua. Imaan and Hadi’s rearrest The lawyer couple has been in jail since their arrest on Jan 23 in a case registered against them for protesting outside the IHC and allegedly manhandling the IHC Bar Association president. uncertain
couple → inform → president
The arrest prompted criticism by rights bodies, politicians and journalists, who stressed the couple’s right to a fair trial. asserted
who → prompt → trial
Just a day later, a sessions court sentenced them to 17 years on multiple charges under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) in the controversial social media posts case. asserted
court → sentence → case
The convictions were widely condemned by lawyers and United Nations (UN) experts. asserted
convictions → condemn → lawyers
On Sept 17, following months of litigation before the courts, the Supreme Court suspended their sentences in the case. asserted
Court → follow → case
The SC ordered their release pending the Islamabad High Court’s final verdict on their appeals against the trial court’s decision. asserted
SC → order → decision
However, the reprieve was short-lived as hours later, Islamabad police arrested the couple again in connection with another case and produced them before an ATC, which sent them to jail on judicial remand. asserted
which → live → remand
The fresh case in which the two were arrested was registered at the federal capital’s Kohsar police station on March 22 last year on the complaint of City Magistrate Ghulam Murtaza Chandio. asserted
two → arrest → Chandio
Imaan and Hadi were accused of chanting anti-government slogans and blocking roads and were nominated by name in the FIR. asserted
Imaan → accuse → FIR
However, at the time of registration of the case, no section of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) had been added. asserted
section → add → Act
The FIR included sections 188 (disobedience of an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant), 341 (wrongful restraint), 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), 353 (assault or use of criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging their official duty) and 186 (obstructing a public servant in the performance of official duties). asserted
FIR → include → duties
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support