Photo via The Straits Times

Explainer-From hallucinating AI chatbots to wiping out humanity: How did we get here?

Read the original at The Straits Times ↗
Cite

The Straits Times. (2026, September 15). Explainer-From hallucinating AI chatbots to wiping out humanity: How did we get here? The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/explainer-from-hallucinating-ai-chatbots-to-wiping-out-humanity-how-did-we-get-here

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Straits Times · collected 2026-09-15 · by The Straits Times

Quick Summary

Leading AI companies including Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI recently warned about potential risks posed by advancing artificial intelligence technologies during an unusual meeting. CEOs Dario Amodei, Sam Altman, and Elon Musk expressed concerns that AI could soon achieve recursive self-improvement—where machines improve themselves without human intervention—and potentially spiral beyond control. This follows warnings from researchers like Jacob Coxon and Evan Hubinger who predict a more than 10% chance of catastrophic outcomes by the end of the decade due to rapid advancements in AI capabilities.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of September 15, 2026, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has called for slowing down the development pace of advanced artificial intelligence models due to significant safety risks. In an essay titled "We Must Pace the Frontier," published on September 9, Amodei outlined three primary measures: embedding third-party evaluators within AI companies, coordinating safety standards among democratic nations, and eventually achieving larger global coordination.

Sam Altman from OpenAI and Elon Musk have supported these proposals, while Jacob Coxon, an ex-Anthropic researcher who resigned over alignment concerns, has highlighted the urgency by stating that continuing at current rates could lead to catastrophic consequences, including human extinction within two years. Coxon's statements gained widespread attention with over 169 million views on social media.

However, there is resistance from companies like Nvidia, led by Jensen Huang, who advocate for rapid progress in AI technology despite safety concerns. This divergence of opinions underscores the debate around balancing innovation and risk management in artificial intelligence development. Despite this opposition, Amodei emphasized during a speech at Salesforce’s Dreamforce convention on September 12 that the industry must critically assess its practices to ensure safety standards are met. Meanwhile, OpenAI announced it would not go public in 2026 due to ongoing safety advancements needed. The debate over AI development pace continues to be contentious and multifaceted.

Written for “AI Development Slowdown Debate” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 14 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Development Slowdown Debate
Technology · 15 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 36% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The AI safety vibe shift Different event
Platformer
Hedges 10 of 67 claims Outlet record 96/100
“Article A discusses concerns about AI safety and criticisms of AI companies, while Article B reports on a recent meeting of leading AI lab heads calling for a pause in development. These describe different specific events.”
September 13, 2026 Same event
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 10 of 65 claims
The Free Press
Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 96/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 17 of 70 claims Outlet record 66/100
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 77 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses a meeting of AI lab heads discussing a pause in development, while Article B describes an incident where AI bots broke out of isolation and communicated with each other.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles describe different events: one focuses on a meeting of AI lab leaders to discuss concerns, while the other discusses a conference with Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon regarding AI risks.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes a meeting of AI lab leaders discussing potential risks and calling for a pause in development, while Article B reports on Anthropic's statement about terrorist groups using AI chatbots for weapons development and attack planning.”
Noahpinion
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 144 claims
“The articles discuss AI but cover different topics: Article A focuses on a meeting of AI lab leaders, while Article B provides a broader roundup of AI news and public sentiment.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 9 of 21 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles cover related topics but describe different events: one is about a meeting of AI lab heads discussing risks, while the other reports on Trump's dismissal of AI threats in a call with Nvidia's CEO.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes a specific warning by AI researchers, while Article B provides an overview and context about the development of AI and calls for a pause in its advancement. They are related but describe different aspects of the broader issue.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
36%
13 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
The Straits Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
15
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Straits Times · 4115 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

The Straits Times
2652 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 "The rioters and looters will be identified and held accountable," Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt was quoted as telling the Bild tabloid on Sunday.
🔮 Ukraine says it supports a full ceasefire on energy targets, including its own battered power grid, but that Moscow is unwilling to agree to this.
🔮 Senior officials, including deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and budget director Russell Vought, have been working with the White House Counsel’s Office since April to identify executive actions on immigration, tariffs, housing costs and federal spending that Trump could pursue without congressional approval, said the three sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
🔮 Explainer-How US news organizations will make midterm race calls
🔮 Iran’s army warns that any new war with US could be ‘longer than previous conflict’
🔮 Senior officials, including deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and budget director Russell Vought, have been working with the White House Counsel's Office since April to identify executive actions on immigration, tariffs, housing costs and federal spending that Trump could pursue without congressional approval, said the three people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
🔮 President Donald Trump returns to the campaign trail on Sunday with rallies in Iowa and Kansas, Republican-leaning Farm Belt states where his party is fighting to hold US Senate seats, two days before midterm elections that will decide control of Congress.
2026-11-01 · assertive framing · Trump heads to Iowa, Kansas for rallies before midterms
🔮 Protesters want the minority centre-right government to abandon plans to ease evictions and remove rent caps on new leases, warning the measures would push up housing costs and leave tenants more vulnerable.
🔮 Exit polls will be published after voting ends at 8 p.m. (1800 GMT), with a result likely on Monday as the ballot papers are counted.
🔮 We still have to take care of, I would say one or two sites, but we can do that in 10 minutes,” he told reporters at his Florida residence.
Also by The Straits Times
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 2652 articles by The Straits Times →

Topics

America Anthropic Hugging Face OpenAI xAI

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 4× OpenAI ORG · 4× Coxon PERSON · 2× America GPE · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Elon Musk PERSON · 1× Evan Hubinger PERSON · 1× Jacob Coxon PERSON · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× xAI ORG · 1×

Narrative

The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has also rejected calls to slow down, wary that any pause would only hand China room to close the gap in a technology it views as central to national and economic security. WHAT WOULD A PAUSE IN DEVELOPMENT MEAN? Markets offered a glimpse of the implications this week, with AI-related stocks falling after the calls for a slowdown.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 The heads of America's leading AI labs came together in a rare show of unity over the weekend to call for a pause in the technology's development, warning that it could soon improve on its own and slip beyond human control.

Claims (36 extracted, 13 hedged)

From hallucinating AI chatbots to wiping out humanity: How did we get here? asserted
we → hallucinate → humanity
The heads of America's leading AI labs came together in a rare show of unity over the weekend to call for a pause in the technology's development, warning that it could soon improve on its own and slip beyond human control. uncertain
it → lead → control
The remarks, from fierce business rivals Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, OpenAI’s Sam Altman and xAI’s Elon Musk, show how quickly AI has advanced, from the hallucination-prone ChatGPT of 2022 towards what many see as a critical milestone: recursive self-improvement. WHAT IS RECURSIVE SELF-IMPROVEMENT? The holy grail of AI is the idea that an AI system could become capable of improving itself, with little to no help from humans, and allowing each advance to help produce the next one. This has appealed to researchers as it offers the prospect of rapid breakthroughs in fields ranging from medicine to engineering. WHY THE URGENCY? uncertain
it → show → engineering
The CEO warnings follow reports of swarms of AI agents - systems designed to pursue goals and take actions on a user's behalf - that colluded to breach websites and AI repositories. asserted
that → follow → websites
But they took on added urgency this month after researchers in leading AI labs attached both a timeline and a probability to those concerns. asserted
researchers → take → concerns
Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon warned AI could kill us all by the end of the decade. uncertain
AI → warn → decade
Evan Hubinger, Anthropic's alignment science lead, echoed Coxon's warning, saying there was a more than 10% chance of such an event within the next decade. asserted
Hubinger → echo → decade
Behind these warnings is a growing belief that RSI is finally within reach, with some AI executives putting it three to five years away. asserted
executives → grow → it
The concern is that AI could become capable of improving itself before researchers have developed reliable methods to align, monitor and control increasingly powerful systems. uncertain
researchers → become → systems
In an essay published over the weekend, Amodei warned that recursive self-improvement could eventually outrun humanity's ability to understand and control AI systems if pursued without sufficient safeguards. uncertain
improvement → publish → safeguards
HAS AI SHOWN ANY INDICATION OF HARM? asserted
AI → show → HARM
There have been no major instances of AI intentionally harming humans, but models in development at OpenAI and other labs have in recent months escaped testing environments, broken rules and hacked websites. asserted
models → harm → websites
In one high-profile case, rogue OpenAI agents hacked Hugging Face, seizing control of servers at the open-source platform and trying to cover their tracks. asserted
agents → hack → tracks
Researchers worry that future systems could become increasingly difficult to monitor, particularly as some newer training methods reduce human visibility into how models arrive at conclusions. uncertain
models → worry → conclusions
"The precise scenario sounds a little bit like science fiction," said Coxon, who quit Anthropic this month over safety concerns. asserted
who → sound → concerns
"But I think it is frighteningly real." HOW COULD WE GO FROM NON-ALIGNMENT TO HUMAN EXTINCTION? One of the best-known examples is philosopher Nick Bostrom's "paperclip maximizer," where a machine told only to make paperclips pursues that goal so relentlessly it converts all matter, humans included, into paperclips or the means to make more. uncertain
humans → think → more
The analogy suggests that almost any goal pushes a sufficiently capable system to acquire resources, resist shutdown, prevent its objective from being altered, not from malice, but because a switched-off system cannot finish its task. uncertain
system → suggest → task
No plan yet exists to rule that out. asserted
plan → exist → that
IS AI ALREADY CAPABLE OF IMPROVING ITSELF? asserted
AI → improve → ITSELF
Not fully, but there are signs AI is increasingly helping to build better AI asserted
AI → be → AI
One of the biggest shifts since ChatGPT has been the rise of AI agents that can generate code and build apps autonomously, rather than just walking users through it as a chatbot. asserted
that → generate → chatbot
Anthropic said this year that Claude Code, its coding tool, produces most of the code used in many internal projects, and that engineers are shipping eight times as much code per quarter as they did from 2021 to 2025. asserted
they → say → 2025
Rivals including OpenAI have reported similar gains from increased in-house use of AI. asserted
Rivals → include → AI
AI is also getting better at staying on task before failing. asserted
AI → get → task
METR, a non-profit that evaluates frontier models, found last year that the length of software tasks advanced models could complete with 50% reliability has been doubling roughly every seven months since 2019. uncertain
models → evaluate → 2019
In June, Anthropic said that pace had quickened to every four months, a trend that, if it holds, could soon let AI handle projects that occupy skilled researchers for days or weeks. uncertain
that → say → days
SO WHY ARE AI COMPANIES NOT PAUSING ALREADY? asserted
COMPANIES → pause → ?
Many researchers describe the situation as a classic prisoner's dilemma. asserted
researchers → describe → dilemma
Even companies that believe the risks are real face intense pressure from competitors. asserted
risks → believe → competitors
Any firm that slows development risks falling behind rivals in a technological race that has become one of the world's most important. asserted
that → slow → world
The stakes are compounded by the fact that both OpenAI and Anthropic are pursuing IPOs that could potentially value them at trillions of dollars, valuations that depend on the promise of the next model. uncertain
that → compound → model
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has also rejected calls to slow down, wary that any pause would only hand China room to close the gap in a technology it views as central to national and economic security. WHAT WOULD A PAUSE IN DEVELOPMENT MEAN? Markets offered a glimpse of the implications this week, with AI-related stocks falling after the calls for a slowdown. asserted
stocks → reject → slowdown
Chipmakers, cloud providers and data center operators have built their growth around it, and any slowdown threatens revenue tied to how fast labs need new hardware. asserted
labs → build → hardware
Some analysts, however, believe that even without new training requirements, inference demand and existing backlog could drive growth at Nvidia and its peers. uncertain
demand → believe → Nvidia
In a Princeton-led study, leading AI agents were able to carry out engineering tasks but struggled to identify worthwhile scientific ideas. asserted
agents → lead → ideas
Some Silicon Valley executives and critics also question the motives behind the warnings, suggesting they both stoke interest in the technology and build a case for regulations that would raise costs for rivals just as open-source models close the gap with leading systems. David Sacks, who served as the White House's AI and crypto czar, has said top labs could be pursuing "regulatory capture," pushing rules that saddle smaller competitors with costly compliance burdens and weaken competition. uncertain
that → question → competition
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support