‘Woke nonsense’: Museum slammed for ‘stupidity and ignorance’ after removing mummy over its lack of consent

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Cost, B. (2026, October 22). ‘Woke nonsense’: Museum slammed for ‘stupidity and ignorance’ after removing mummy over its lack of consent. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/22/science/mummies-removed-from-scotland-museum-due-to-lack-of-consent/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-22 · by Ben Cost

Quick Summary

A Scottish museum in Glasgow removed several ancient Egyptian mummies and body parts from its display due to a lack of documented consent from the deceased. The move by Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum has sparked controversy, with critics calling it "woke nonsense" and "educational stupidity." Critics argue that removing these artifacts prevents educational opportunities for visitors, especially children, while supporters cite contemporary ethical guidelines set by the International Council of Museums.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-22, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 23, 2026, Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum in Glasgow removed several Egyptian mummies from public display due to ethical concerns about the lack of "informed consent" from the deceased individuals. The Glasgow Life, an arm's-length charitable organization funded by the SNP-run Glasgow City Council, made this decision, citing contemporary museum practices as outlined by the International Council of Museums' (ICOM) revised Code of Ethics in June 2026. The changes followed signs posted at Kelvingrove stating that human remains were removed "as a mark of respect." Additionally, The Hunterian Museum covered Lady Shep-En-Hor's mummified body with a specially designed textile to protect it from public view. Despite this move, the National Museums Scotland (NMS) has stated they are not considering changes to their display of human remains in their extensive collection. The controversy sparked criticism and debate over whether such ethical concerns justify removing historical artifacts from public view.

Written for “Museum Removes Mummies Over Ethics” on 2026-10-23, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Museum Removes Mummies Over Ethics
Other · 3 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail · 0.91 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 30 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles describe the same museum in Scotland removing mummies from display due to concerns about lack of informed consent, citing the same sign and items removed.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 26 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles describe the removal of mummified remains from display at Glasgow's Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum due to ethical concerns, indicating the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
2 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Other
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 13251 article(s) · 33 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 33 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ben Cost
34 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Due to their negligence, officials said the hikers would have to foot their own rescue bill, which could range from $1,000 to $20,000 depending on the cost, according to the Boston Globe.
🔮 They couldn’t slow its roll.
🔮 Mummies might not curse defilers from the afterlife, but that doesn’t mean you should display their remains, apparently.
🔮 The company’s investigators reportedly discovered a glitch that allowed them to access pages from over 6,800 links Muse had created so users could share pages with each other, Ars Technica reported.
🔮 In their final post before their death, the duo could be seen taking to the streets on a wheeled contraption.
🔮 The 78-year-old Nobel Prize winner notably stepped down from Google in 2023 over fears that the tech could manufacture killer robots capable of exterminating humanity.
🔮 Despite logging onto the Apple Store app “the moment it opened,” it reportedly glitched out and they couldn’t press buy.
🔮 That means that high-latitude nations like the UK, Canada, and Norway will face the greatest solar storm risk between December and February.
🔮 While humans might be mostly to blame for Antarctica’s snow melt, scientists are pointing to another surprising source of the a-thaw-calypse — penguin poop.
🔮 Joshua Mhlakela of South Africa claimed that the Biblical event — the end of humanity marked by Jesus whisking his followers up to heaven, per the New Testament — will not occur on September 23 as previously predicted but will now go down early next week, the Daily Mail reported.
Also by Ben Cost
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 34 articles by Ben Cost →

Topics

Glasgow Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum Luxor Scottish Telegraph

Subjects

Scottish NORP · 4× Egypt GPE · 2× Egyptian NORP · 2× Glasgow GPE · 2× Glasgow Life ORG · 2× Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum ORG · 1× Luxor GPE · 1× Nekt PERSON · 1× Telegraph ORG · 1× the Daily Mail ORG · 1×

Narrative

The so-called canceled artifacts included a mummified male head, a mummified foot, a mummified right hand recovered from the Valley of the Kings in Luxor, Egypt and the remains of a priest called Nekt. Glasgow Life, a publicly funded non-profit that oversees the Scottish city’s cultural institutions, claimed that the unorthodox move “reflects contemporary museum practice,” the Daily Mail reported.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-22
🔮 Mummies might not curse defilers from the afterlife, but that doesn’t mean you should display their remains, apparently.

Claims (26 extracted, 2 hedged)

Dead man “wokeing.” asserted
man → wokee → ?
Mummies might not curse defilers from the afterlife, but that doesn’t mean you should display their remains, apparently. uncertain
you → curse → remains
A Scottish museum has been branded “woke” after reportedly removing a museum’s mummies because the individuals hadn’t given their consent. uncertain
individuals → brand → consent
Indeed, visitors to Glasgow’s Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum will notice new signs at certain exhibits declaring that curators “removed human remains from this display as a mark of respect,” the Telegraph reported. asserted
Telegraph → notice → respect
The so-called canceled artifacts included a mummified male head, a mummified foot, a mummified right hand recovered from the Valley of the Kings in Luxor, Egypt and the remains of a priest called Nekt. Glasgow Life, a publicly funded non-profit that oversees the Scottish city’s cultural institutions, claimed that the unorthodox move “reflects contemporary museum practice,” the Daily Mail reported. asserted
Mail → call → practice
“The International Council of Museums’ revised Code of Ethics, published in June 2026, states that museums ‘should uphold the inherent dignity of human remains and promote respect for their significance,'” a spokesperson declared. asserted
spokesperson → revise → significance
“Glasgow Life Museums’ draft Human Remains Policy proposes that human remains should only be displayed where there is documented and informed consent from the deceased individual or, in appropriate circumstances, their descendants.” asserted
remains → propose → circumstances
They added, “In the absence of such consent, we believe removing ancient Egyptian human remains from display is more respectful to the deceased individuals.” asserted
removing → add → individuals
Culture vultures were appalled at this alleged desecration. asserted
vultures → appal → desecration
“I really struggle to see who benefits from this, or how it’s showing anyone more respect,” vented one X poster, while another fumed, “The HR-ification of our society is infuriating.” asserted
ification → struggle → society
A third wrote, “The museum sector is ideologically possessed these days. asserted
sector → write → ?
[I] walked around a museum in Bath recently and every sign had a second sign under it where some victim group pertaining to the first sign had to be called out. asserted
group → walk → sign
Meanwhile, visitor Johnny McFarlane claimed that the removal robbed him and his daughter of a fun and educational experience. asserted
removal → claim → experience
“My daughter has a book on the ancient Egyptians and has been quite animated by it so we took her to Kelvingrove Museum to see their mummy,” he lamented on X alongside a pic of the sign. asserted
he → have → sign
“Except, it’s no longer there. asserted
it → ’ → ?
All ‘human remains’ gone with the following sign up in place of exhibits that have been there for years.” asserted
that → go → years
Chris McGovern, chairman of the Campaign for Real Education and a former adviser to the Policy Unit at 10 Downing Street, labeled the decision “virtue-signalling, woke nonsense.” asserted
McGovern → label → decision
“It represents the triumph of educational stupidity and ignorance,” the official declared. asserted
official → represent → stupidity
“It is not possible to seek permission from those who died thousands of years ago.” asserted
who → seek → years
He added, “visitors to Scottish museums, children in particular, deserve better — they are being short-changed.” asserted
they → add → better
McGovern urged local institutions to follow the lead of the “great museums in Egypt” and “display mummies and human remains in a respectful way.” asserted
McGovern → urge → way
Scottish Tory culture spokesman Murdo Fraser also condemned the move, labeling it a symptom of PC culture run amok. asserted
Fraser → condemn → culture
“Even Egyptian mummies are now being cancelled by a society so obsessed with modern sensibilities that it has lost all sense of perspective,” he said. asserted
he → cancel → perspective
“People visit museums to learn about ancient civilisations, not to see history hidden away because it fails to meet today’s ideological standards. asserted
it → visit → standards
“Glasgow’s museums should be showcasing our history, not quietly removing it to appease the latest trend in political correctness.” Despite the outcry, this is apparently just the beginning of the wrap battle. asserted
this → showcase → battle
Glasgow Life said it also plans to remove other so-called problematic human remains from Kelvingrove as well as the St. Mungo Museum of Religious Art and Life. asserted
it → say → Art
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support