Amy Hamm: UBC staffer shuts down claim he called Galloway a ‘serial predator’

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Jerema, C. (2026, October 21). Amy Hamm: UBC staffer shuts down claim he called Galloway a ‘serial predator’. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/amy-hamm-ubc-staffer-shuts-down-claim-he-called-galloway-a-serial-predator

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

National Post · collected 2026-10-21 · by Carson Jerema analysis

Quick Summary

At B.C. Supreme Court during Steven Galloway’s defamation trial, UBC community relations officer Stephen Bohnen testified that he was never head of campus security and denied ever calling Galloway a "serial predator," contradicting claims made by Galloway's accuser A.B. in an email. The court heard Bohnen documented incidents involving Galloway but did not conduct formal investigations, and the witness expressed disbelief at the accusation during his testimony.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-21, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

At his defamation trial on October 21, 2026, Steven Galloway's legal team presented testimony from former UBC community relations officer Stephen Bohnen, who confirmed that the accuser, known as A.B., initially complained to campus security about Galloway's sexual harassment in July 2013. A.B. alleged that Galloway repeatedly propositioned her for sex and gave her scotch in his office. The testimony contradicts previous claims made by A.B. in an email where she stated that Bohnen, who was not the head of campus security at the time, had warned about Galloway being a "serial predator." UBC suspended Galloway in November 2015 following an investigation into A.B.'s allegations and dismissed him the next year after a retired judge's report largely cleared Galloway.

Written for “Galloway Trial Hearings” on 2026-10-21, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 96959 · logged 2026-10-21

Story

📰 Galloway Trial Hearings
Crime & Law · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 13 📰 publisher trust 69
“The articles describe different events occurring in distinct locations with different individuals involved.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 18% hedged 6 of 33 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different individuals and incidents related to university campus safety and accusations, but do not describe the same specific event.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 53
“The articles describe different testimonies on consecutive days in the defamation trial.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 26 📰 publisher trust 53
“Both articles describe testimony from Stephen Bohnen regarding an accusation by A.B. against Steven Galloway in July 2013 at UBC, during a trial on the same day.”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles describe different aspects of the Steven Galloway case at different times: one is Margaret Atwood's criticism of media coverage, and the other is testimony in a defamation trial.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 5 of 45 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A discusses broader societal reactions to Steven Galloway's defamation trial, while Article B focuses on a specific testimony at the trial regarding UBC staff and an accuser.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
48
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
3 of 48 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 1039 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Carson Jerema
51 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Sharma refused to issue a ban, which she said would violate the open courtroom principle and was an “extreme measure,” but noted that media present in the courtroom could observe the woman’s request.
🔮 Given the riots’ aesthetic and demographic makeup, politicians on the right may feel increasingly emboldened to issue statements of this kind — which reflect the existential tenor with which the unrest has been received among right-wing populists the world over; as well as the enormous stakes voters of all hues will feel going into the presidential elections in April.
🔮 Saturday night, the city elected Green Party of Vancouver’s Pete Fry as mayor.
🔮 It’s a curious position for innovators who have made grand claims about their products’ potential and who could, presumably, simply drop their efforts if they believe the risks outweigh the benefits.
🔮 Monday night, Quebec may have created its own three-party problem.
🔮 Not that anyone would necessarily question Harper’s commitment to the country, but his entry into the debate was one federalists have been eagerly awaiting.
🔮 David Eby has looked at his election campaign struggling to find its feet and decided that while socialism is good, even more socialism would be better.
🔮 Looking at the polls, it is almost certain that Quebeckers will wake up on Tuesday to a Parti Québécois government.
🔮 This followed months of internal strife with several high-profile staff and MLAs either quitting or saying they wouldn’t run again.
🔮 The Coalition Avenir Québec was founded because a huge number of Quebecers wanted something neither the Parti Québécois nor the Quebec Liberals could give them.
Also by Carson Jerema
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 51 articles by Carson Jerema →

Topics

A.B. B.C. Supreme Court UBC University of British Columbia the University of British Columbia

Subjects

Galloway PERSON · 15× A.B. ORG · 10× C.W. PERSON · 8× UBC ORG · 8× Rooney PERSON · 4× Bohnen PERSON · 3× Lyon PERSON · 2× Steven Galloway PERSON · 2× B.C. Supreme Court ORG · 1× the University of British Columbia ORG · 1×

Narrative

Kirchmeier stated that she wanted to show how UBC’s alleged mishandling of A.B.’s incident report would prove that she was not malicious for rejecting retired judge Mary Ellen Boyd’s investigation report, which essentially cleared Galloway’s name.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-21
🔮 Sharma refused to issue a ban, which she said would violate the open courtroom principle and was an “extreme measure,” but noted that media present in the courtroom could observe the woman’s request.

Claims (48 extracted, 3 hedged)

Author Steven Galloway’s accuser once alleged that the head of campus security at the University of British Columbia (UBC) had warned that Galloway was a “serial predator.” asserted
Galloway → allege → Columbia
The man in question says he has no memory of that ever happening. asserted
that → say → memory
At his defamation trail at B.C. Supreme Court Tuesday, Galloway’s legal team called retired UBC community relations officer Stephen Bohnen as witness. asserted
team → call → witness
He testified that A.B., whose name is protected by a publication ban, came to his office in 2013 complaining that Galloway had given her several drinks of hard liquor and propositioned her for sex, which A.B. said was not an isolated incident. asserted
A.B. → testify → sex
Bohnen said that his department wrote incident reports, including this one about A.B., as matters of documentation rather than investigation. asserted
department → say → investigation
Galloway’s lawyer, Daniel Burnett, walked Bohnen through his 2013 incident report before showing him an email A.B. had sent to someone else. asserted
A.B. → walk → someone
In this email, A.B. claimed that Burnett, who she referred to as “Steve,” was head of campus security, assisted her to put a safety plan in place, and told her that Galloway was a “serial predator.” asserted
Galloway → claim → her
Bohnen testified that he was never head of campus security and has no recollection of ever telling A.B. that Galloway was a serial predator. asserted
Galloway → testify → A.B.
“I certainly can’t remember anything like that,” he told the court, sounding flabbergasted. asserted
he → remember → court
A.B. accused bestselling novelist and former University of British Columbia (UBC) professor Steven Galloway of rape in 2015. asserted
A.B. → accuse → 2015
The unproven allegations were deemed not to have occurred by retired judge Mary Ellen Boyd, who investigated the matter on behalf of UBC. asserted
who → deem → UBC
Nevertheless, Galloway’s career, reputation, and mental health were destroyed by the highly publicized accusations. asserted
career → destroy → accusations
Galloway’s lawyers also subpoenaed a former UBC student and friend of A.B., C.W. asserted
lawyers → subpoena → A.B.
This witness pleaded with Justice Neena Sharma to issue a publication ban on her name to keep her out of the media. asserted
witness → plead → media
Sharma refused to issue a ban, which she said would violate the open courtroom principle and was an “extreme measure,” but noted that media present in the courtroom could observe the woman’s request. uncertain
media → refuse → request
C.W. testified broadly to her former friendship with A.B., while they were both students at UBC, to her experience in the creative writing program, and her reaction to how the university handled A.B.’s allegations. asserted
university → testify → allegations
She said that the creative writing program was “very intimate,” and that Galloway “seemed concerned with fostering a collegial, respectful environment.” asserted
Galloway → say → environment
She also said that Galloway helped any student who asked for assistance finding an agent. asserted
who → say → agent
The woman testified that Galloway did this for Chelsea Rooney, the former student who spearheaded the campaign against him, at the behest of several UBC creative writing professors. asserted
who → testify → professors
She said she was shocked when Rooney contacted her post-graduation, first in a message and later a phone call, to solicit allegations about misconduct by Galloway — and stated that Galloway “violently raped” and choked A.B. asserted
Galloway → say → A.B.
As per C.W.’s testimony, she questioned why A.B., who had been a close friend, never told her about the alleged crimes. asserted
who → question → crimes
She said she also demanded that Rooney explain why the allegations were not being taken to police, but testified she was not given a straight answer. asserted
she → say → answer
Four days later, C.W. testified, Rooney copied her on an email encouraging the recipients to contact a Canadian Press journalist with any or all allegations against Galloway. asserted
Rooney → testify → Galloway
C.W. said that she went on to contact UBC professor Annabel Lyon (one of the former defendants who settled with Galloway before trial) to express her alarm with Rooney’s informal and “unbelievable” investigation. asserted
who → say → investigation
“I feel any of us could be persecuted in this manner,” C.W. wrote to Lyon. uncertain
C.W. → feel → Lyon
C.W. testified that Lyon deferred her to someone in the dean of arts office, who only ever issued a “formality of a response” to C.W.’s emailed concerns. asserted
who → testify → concerns
Finally, C.W. testified that she was present at the May 5, 2011 book reading event that occurred on the night A.B. said she was raped by Galloway in his office, prior to the event. uncertain
she → testify → event
As per C.W., A.B. “seemed in good spirits.” asserted
A.B. → seem → spirits
This echoed testimony given the day prior by another of A.B.’s former friends, who described her as “happy, lucid, and well put together” at the book reading. asserted
who → echo → reading
Glynnis Kirchmeier, the self-represented defendant and law student, again presented to the court as floundering. asserted
Kirchmeier → represent → court
Last week, Justice Sharma repeatedly interrupted Kirchmeier’s cross examination of Galloway, and went so far as to counsel her that she was putting together a defence that is not in alignment with her pleadings. asserted
that → interrupt → pleadings
On Tuesday, Justice Sharma similarly halted Kirchmeier’s cross examination of Bohnen, the former UBC community relations officer. asserted
Sharma → halt → Bohnen
Kirchmeier asked Bohnen numerous questions about UBC’s internal policies, and who had access to campus incident reports. asserted
who → ask → reports
Justice Sharma asked Kirchmeier to explain “how this is relevant to an issue I need to decide in this case.” asserted
I → ask → case
Kirchmeier stated that she wanted to show how UBC’s alleged mishandling of A.B.’s incident report would prove that she was not malicious for rejecting retired judge Mary Ellen Boyd’s investigation report, which essentially cleared Galloway’s name. asserted
which → state → name
“Why would I need to know about the evidence I just heard?” Sharma asked pointedly. asserted
Sharma → need → evidence
She allowed Kirchmeier to continue despite saying she wasn’t sure she understood the purpose of the evidence. asserted
she → allow → evidence
The court spent Tuesday afternoon in a voir dire (a trial to within a trial) hearing on the admissibility of an expert report. asserted
court → spend → report
Justice Sharma is expected to rule on this early next week. asserted
Sharma → expect → this
Galloway’s lawyer, Daniel Burnett, also spent parts of the day reading in transcripts from previous hearings, including a 2019 cross examination of A.B. in which she admitted lying to UBC about CBC’s legal team vetting her rape allegations. asserted
she → spend → allegations
…and 8 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support