Photo via New York Post

Do Anthropic and OpenAI want AI regulation to save humanity, or are they just trying to squeeze out competition?

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Moynihan, L. (2026, September 14). Do Anthropic and OpenAI want AI regulation to save humanity, or are they just trying to squeeze out competition? New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/14/opinion/do-ai-companies-want-to-save-humanity-or-are-they-just-trying-to-squeeze-out-competition/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-14 · by Lydia Moynihan

Quick Summary

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI’s Sam Altman have recently pushed for government regulation of artificial intelligence, arguing that AI development is progressing too rapidly and poses a significant risk to humanity. They call for industry-wide regulations that could stifle smaller competitors while allowing established giants like Anthropic and OpenAI to continue operating largely unhindered. Critics argue that this push for regulation may be more about limiting competition than ensuring safety, given the companies’ financial losses and their impending IPOs projected at substantial valuations.
Written by AI on 2026-09-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of September 15, 2026, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has called for slowing down the development pace of advanced artificial intelligence models due to significant safety risks. In an essay titled "We Must Pace the Frontier," published on September 9, Amodei outlined three primary measures: embedding third-party evaluators within AI companies, coordinating safety standards among democratic nations, and eventually achieving larger global coordination.

Sam Altman from OpenAI and Elon Musk have supported these proposals, while Jacob Coxon, an ex-Anthropic researcher who resigned over alignment concerns, has highlighted the urgency by stating that continuing at current rates could lead to catastrophic consequences, including human extinction within two years. Coxon's statements gained widespread attention with over 169 million views on social media.

However, there is resistance from companies like Nvidia, led by Jensen Huang, who advocate for rapid progress in AI technology despite safety concerns. This divergence of opinions underscores the debate around balancing innovation and risk management in artificial intelligence development. Despite this opposition, Amodei emphasized during a speech at Salesforce’s Dreamforce convention on September 12 that the industry must critically assess its practices to ensure safety standards are met. Meanwhile, OpenAI announced it would not go public in 2026 due to ongoing safety advancements needed. The debate over AI development pace continues to be contentious and multifaceted.

Written for “AI Development Slowdown Debate” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 14 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Development Slowdown Debate
Technology · 15 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 20% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 8 of 66 claims Outlet record 97/100
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and concerns expressed by companies, not the same specific incident.”
The Free Press
Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 96/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 57 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI opposition and regulation, with Article A focusing on physical protests against data centers and Article B discussing calls for industry-wide regulation by major tech companies.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 10 claims Outlet record 65/100
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 5 of 38 claims Outlet record 95/100
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses AI leaders calling for regulation and government intervention, while Article B focuses on President Trump dismissing calls for AI regulation.”
Reason
Hedges 5 of 35 claims Outlet record 67/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 4 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different legal and regulatory actions by various companies, not the same specific incident.”
BBC News
Hedges 6 of 26 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses Anthropic and OpenAI's calls for AI regulation, while Article B reports on Trump's reaction to those concerns, which are different but related events.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
40
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
8 of 40 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
15
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15592 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Lydia Moynihan
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 One source noted the idea that Anthropic was merely working on a statistics assignment doesn’t fully explain its AI’s actions — and noted how odd it was for an agent to seek election-related data which could potentially be shared with bad actors or used for campaign purposes.
🔮 Before the demonstration began, Musk admitted he wasn’t sure it would work, saying “success is not guaranteed.” Then, the Tesla Roadster drove up a curved ramp until it was hanging upside down, held in place by underbody suction fans.
🔮 Artificial intelligence’s incredible ability to solve complicated problems could help unravel the security underpinning much of the cryptocurrency industry by accelerating the development of super-advanced quantum computers capable of cracking its defenses.
🔮 On Monday, Jacob Coxon, the former Anthropic researcher, continued his alarmism tour — minus the Harry Potter glasses — before a rare “Committee of the Whole” at City Hall, warning that AI could escape human control and kill us all.
🔮 The last week has been full of fear-mongering: Bill Gates warning AI could cause “a billion deaths,” on Meet The Press, Anthropic once again touting its tech as posing “catastrophic or existential risks to humanity” in its filing ahead of a possible IPO, and even SNL calling out Dario Amodei’s doomerism.
🔮 Hassen asserts that DOGE fundamentally changed how the government approached spending by cancelling contracts that otherwise would have renewed; consolidating purchasing by creating OneGov, rather than having agencies negotiate separately with the same vendors; and implementing new guardrails around wiring money by placing a tracking code on payments that had previously gone out unlabeled.
🔮 Instinct, an upstart company which lives in iMessage or Whatsapp rather than its own separate app, lets users text it like you would an actual human assistant.
🔮 AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI suddenly started sounding a five-alarm fire last week, insisting their tech is just too good, developing too fast for humanity to handle and could kill us all.
Also by Lydia Moynihan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Lydia Moynihan →

Topics

Amodei Anthropic FTC OpenAI Washington

Subjects

OpenAI ORG · 6× Anthropic ORG · 5× Alvaro Bedoya PERSON · 1× Amodei ORG · 1× Bedoya PERSON · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Elon Musk PERSON · 1× FTC ORG · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

On Tuesday, he is slated to appear at the Future of Life Institute’s “Pro-Human Assembly” alongside figures such as Steve Bannon, Bernie Sanders, and Randi Weingarten (Sanders, for his part, has previously appeared alongside Chinese Communist Party officials at an event trying to slow the pace of AI).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI suddenly started sounding a five-alarm fire last week, insisting their tech is just too good, developing too fast for humanity to handle and could kill us all.

Claims (40 extracted, 8 hedged)

AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI suddenly started sounding a five-alarm fire last week, insisting their tech is just too good, developing too fast for humanity to handle and could kill us all. uncertain
humanity → start → us
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wants to “slow the pace” of the entire AI industry and demanded government intervention. asserted
Amodei → want → intervention
Just hours later, OpenAI chief Sam Altman chimed in to say he agreed, as did Elon Musk. asserted
Musk → chime → ?
Business leaders were quick to point out that nothing is stopping these companies from independently slowing their innovation. asserted
nothing → point → innovation
But nobody would deliberately handicap themselves — it seems what they really want is for the government to bring in industry-wide regulation. asserted
government → handicap → regulation
Such a move would quickly squelch many of the smaller players, while the biggest companies — namely Anthropic and OpenAI — would be able to ride it out. asserted
companies → squelch → it
It’s a well-worn playbook of regulatory capture: Incumbents warn of impending catastrophe and agitate for regulation, which handily prevents competitors from eclipsing them. asserted
which → ’ → them
Amodei also advocated in a blog post for Washington to give frontier labs a so-called antitrust waiver, which would allow them to coordinate with one another without raising federal collusion or monopoly concerns — essentially a pass for companies to regulate themselves — to ensure safety. asserted
companies → advocate → safety
Now, you don’t need an antitrust waiver to make sure technology is safe, as former FTC Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya pointed out. asserted
Bedoya → need → waiver
You do need one if you’re looking to coordinate on other areas beyond keeping people safe. asserted
you → need → people
Any wavier, as Bedoya put it, “should be met with deep skepticism in light of the economics of the industry and the threat they face from open [source] models.” asserted
they → put → models
In some respects, I can’t blame them for taking this approach. asserted
I → blame → approach
These companies have burned hundreds of billions in development and are still losing money — OpenAI lost approximately $39 billion in 2025 — so they depend on hitting record-setting values in their IPOs. asserted
they → burn → IPOs
And while their technology may be used to cure cancer or infinitely increase productivity, the companies themselves won’t necessarily profit from such innovations. uncertain
companies → use → innovations
Maybe they are sincere in their belief AI could doom the world, but it’s awfully convenient to push for regulation when they are on the cusp of cementing their role as worldwide leaders. uncertain
they → doom → leaders
Anthropic’s public prospectus is expected within weeks and could value the giant at $2 trillion. uncertain
prospectus → expect → trillion
OpenAI pulled their IPO plans, with reports suggesting they will now go public in 2027. asserted
they → pull → 2027
Amodei also has a history of causing alarm — such as in May 2025 when he said half of entry-level white collar-jobs could be eliminated by his new technology. uncertain
half → have → technology
For the record, AI has created more jobs than it has eliminated and the World Economic Forum predicts that will only continue. asserted
that → create → jobs
Jacob Coxon — the 27-year-old researcher who quit Anthropic after just four months, following three years at OpenAI — went viral warning the companies were “gambling with our lives.” asserted
companies → quit → lives
His post racked up more than 100 million views on X, despite the fact he had almost no prior history on the platform. asserted
he → rack → platform
And within the next few days he had landed wall-to-wall coverage and interviews with Fox, CNN, NBC, ABC, The New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. asserted
he → land → Fox
On Tuesday, he is slated to appear at the Future of Life Institute’s “Pro-Human Assembly” alongside figures such as Steve Bannon, Bernie Sanders, and Randi Weingarten (Sanders, for his part, has previously appeared alongside Chinese Communist Party officials at an event trying to slow the pace of AI). asserted
Sanders → slat → AI
That’s Coxon’s solution after warning that AI could kill us all? uncertain
AI → ’ → us
I could hardly conceive of a more bizarre, not to mention feckless, group to create a framework for reining in the most advanced technology known to mankind. uncertain
I → conceive → mankind
The best take was perhaps Clement Delangue, the CEO of AI company Hugging Face, who claimed asking Coxon “about AI extinction risk is like asking your AC guy about climate change.” asserted
asking → claim → change
Amid all this AI doom and gloom, you have to ask — who stands to benefit? asserted
who → have → doom
The answer is, of course, incumbent frontier labs and our foreign adversaries who will happily race ahead if we slow down. asserted
we → race → course
Fortunately, the White House isn’t playing into it. asserted
House → play → it
JD Vance said frontier AI companies “begging the government to regulate them” felt like “a Trojan horse.” asserted
companies → say → horse
Trump, meanwhile, explained, “We’re leading China in AI. asserted
We → explain → AI
We’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI, wins.” asserted
wins → ’re → AI
It is fair to have questions and concerns about AI, its bias and its impact on people. asserted
It → have → people
But maybe the best place to get answers isn’t always from the people who are running it, especially when rivals like Amodei and Altman seem so suspiciously eager to fall on their swords. asserted
rivals → get → swords
As Trump put it: “When, in the History of Business, did anyone see the Leaders of an Industry call for Regulation that, if strongly implemented, will drive them into oblivion and bankruptcy? asserted
that → put → oblivion
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has a history of causing alarm — like he did in May 2025 when he said half of entry-level white collar jobs could be eliminated by the new technology. uncertain
half → have → technology
Bloomberg via Getty Images OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said he agrees with Dario Amodei when it comes to reining in the pace of innovation for frontier labs. asserted
it → say → labs
REUTERS Jacob Coxon, a 27-year-old researcher who quit Anthropic after just four months (following three years at OpenAI), went viral for warning that the companies were “racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.” asserted
companies → quit → lives
Fox News President Donald Trump called the anti-AI and data center sentiment imperiling innovation a "sick conspiracy." asserted
Trump → call → innovation
REUTERS Jacob Coxon's post slamming AI went on to reach over 100 million people as he raised alarm bells about how rapidly AI is moving. asserted
AI → slam → bells
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support