‘Reverse-Engineer Anything’ Is the New Wild West of AI

Read the original at 404 Media ↗
Cite

Koebler, J. (2026, October 20). ‘Reverse-Engineer Anything’ Is the New Wild West of AI. 404 Media. https://www.404media.co/reverse-engineer-anything-is-the-new-wild-west-of-ai/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

404 Media · collected 2026-10-20 · by Jason Koebler

Quick Summary

Recent trends show people using AI to hack and repurpose smart devices like TVs and picture frames by installing custom software or open-source alternatives, often reversing functionality that manufacturers have disabled or altered. This includes removing ads, restoring bricked hardware, and improving user interfaces. The practice is gaining popularity due to the ease of use with AI tools, though there are concerns about reliability and legality. Notably, a GitHub project called "Reverse Engineer Anything" has become highly viral as people share their hacks and modifications online.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 20, 404 Media reports that a new trend called "Reverse-Engineer Anything" is rapidly gaining popularity, allowing users to clone or modify existing software and hardware products using artificial intelligence. Over the weekend, people began hacking smart TVs to replace their operating systems with AI-written versions designed to reduce bloatware and simplify interfaces. This practice extends to other internet-of-things devices like picture frames turned into smart calendars and baby monitors stripped of ads. Additionally, Lululemon fitness mirrors that were previously abandoned by the company are being brought back to life with new software developed through AI decompilation techniques. This trend raises concerns about intellectual property theft and the reliability of these cloned products in various industries including tech and entertainment.

Written for “Reverse Engineer Anything AI” on 2026-10-20, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 93518 · logged 2026-10-20

Story

📰 Reverse Engineer Anything AI
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
5 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
95/100
404 Media's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

404 Media · 145 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Jason Koebler
24 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “But there’s a lot of work associated with maintaining software so there may be a lot of instances where the software may not be reliable enough to use—I don’t know how many companies are going to be adopting these clones.”
🔮 In fact, with a small amount of Googling and/or clicking around social media, it is easy to find out everything you would ever need to know about the robot and what happened here.
🔮 Hill's decision will not set a binding precedent and there are several other cases throughout the nation considering the legality of warrantless ALPR searches.
🔮 Humoring the idea that LLMs are or could be conscious is a third-rail topic among many people who study and criticize AI.
🔮 “We will not add facial recognition to our devices,” Flock CEO Garrett Langley said in a recent video.
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · Surveillance Finds a Way
🔮 As Flock continues to be the center of a nationwide conversation about automatic license plate reading cameras, the company has said that it doesn’t, and won’t, do facial recognition: “We will not add facial recognition to our devices,” Flock CEO Garrett Langley said in a recent video.
🔮 “You may,” the judge says.
🔮 Last week, Meta executives announced that its much-hyped AI agent, Muse, had a new feature: It could call businesses for you to do things like make a restaurant reservation or a haircut appointment.
🔮 “Millions of people around the world will soon consider large models ‘hoovering up’ all their work to be an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions,” an internal Microsoft document cited in the case read, adding “almost no one intended for content they created to be used in this fashion, nor are they compensated for its use.”
🔮 Flock City PD also searched extremely sensitive queries, which Flock told 404 Media were done to prove that the system would not actually perform these searches and that its moderation tools worked.
Also by Jason Koebler
The Staples Gift Card Heist
2026-10-19 · 404 Media
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 24 articles by Jason Koebler →

Topics

404 Media Lululemon Netflix Vibe Xiaomi

Subjects

404 Media ORG · 1× Apple PERSON · 1× Claude Code PERSON · 1× Gathin PERSON · 1× Lululemon ORG · 1× Mike Nolan PERSON · 1× Netflix ORG · 1× Vibe ORG · 1× Xiaomi ORG · 1× “Reverse Engineer Anything” ORG · 1×

Narrative

It can inspect the app without its source code, explain how the feature works, show the evidence, and build a version for your project.” What this promises is a way to easily clone and modify other people’s products; it is the same general principle that has in recent weeks allowed for the viral, AI-driven clones of Adobe’s Creative Cloud software, Microsoft Office and the “decompilation” of hundreds of different video games.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20
🔮 “But there’s a lot of work associated with maintaining software so there may be a lot of instances where the software may not be reliable enough to use—I don’t know how many companies are going to be adopting these clones.”
2026-10-20 · 404 Media
‘Reverse-Engineer Anything’ Is the New Wild West of AI · assertive framing

Claims (39 extracted, 5 hedged)

Over the weekend, it became fashionable to use AI to replace the operating systems on smart TVs with vibe coded or AI reverse-engineered ones to make them less bloated. asserted
them → become → ones
People have taken proprietary internet-of-things devices that were bricked and abandoned by their creators and used AI to hack them and install new software on them, giving functionality the original developers took away. asserted
developers → take → functionality
In the last few days I have seen people hack smart picture frames to become AI-powered smart calendars, baby monitors to remove all ads, and bricked Lululemon mirrors to bring them back to life with new software. asserted
people → see → software
And dozens and dozens of TVs to install AI-written software that removes bloatware, ads, and simplifies the user interface. asserted
that → install → interface
What we’re seeing is vibe coding, but instead of making something from scratch, people are using AI to take an existing piece of software and replicate its features, its functionality, or cloning it wholesale. asserted
people → see → it
In some cases, people are using AI to take a proprietary piece of hardware and install some version of open source software on it. asserted
people → use → it
It is the plagiarism machine being used for plagiarism, but also it is random people using AI to take control back over devices whose proprietary software was used to arbitrarily lock away basic functionality, to add advertisements, surveillance, and bloat to devices that probably shouldn’t have them, or whose functionality was bricked altogether. asserted
functionality → use → them
“All I am hearing from software engineers is that software-as-a-service is dying as a business model,” Mike Nolan, who studies the politics of open source software, told 404 Media about the recent spate of AI-driven clones. asserted
who → hear → clones
“It’s becoming so easy to recreate the functionality that you want [with AI.]” asserted
you → become → AI
“The barrier for recreating this stuff is lower, so a lot of people are doing it for fun,” he added. asserted
he → recreate → fun
“But there’s a lot of work associated with maintaining software so there may be a lot of instances where the software may not be reliable enough to use—I don’t know how many companies are going to be adopting these clones.” uncertain
companies → ’ → clones
In one example, a user named Gathin wrote in a post on X: “Vibe coded my parents’ TV this afternoon! asserted
Vibe → name → TV
It was showing a sponsored ad before you could even get to Netflix. uncertain
you → show → Netflix
Gave Claude Code the model number, it found the TV on wifi, removed 25 Xiaomi packages and wrote a new launcher.” asserted
it → give → launcher
That post has allegedly been viewed more than 6 million times. uncertain
post → view → ?
“Looks like an Apple TV now lol.” It has been possible to do a lot of this for a long time using open source, human-coded repositories. asserted
It → look → repositories
There are many communities of people who have spent hundreds of hours bringing bricked internet-of-things hardware from the dead or finding vulnerabilities that allow one to modify or repair devices that have proprietary software on them. asserted
that → be → them
But over the weekend, a project called “Reverse Engineer Anything” became one of the most viral GitHub repositories in recent memory, with more than 342,000 stars as of the time I’m writing this. asserted
I → call → this
The project uses AI to deconstruct features in other pieces of software, and allows the user to replicate them: asserted
user → use → them
“See a feature in an app that you want in your own product? asserted
you → see → product
It can inspect the app without its source code, explain how the feature works, show the evidence, and build a version for your project.” What this promises is a way to easily clone and modify other people’s products; it is the same general principle that has in recent weeks allowed for the viral, AI-driven clones of Adobe’s Creative Cloud software, Microsoft Office and the “decompilation” of hundreds of different video games. asserted
that → inspect → games
This tactic is being used not just on software you run on your computer, but also to reverse-engineer and modify the embedded software on physical devices. asserted
you → use → devices
A person who claims to make guitar pedals, for example, claimed on Hacker News that he used AI to clone the effects algorithms of three of his competitors using AI: uncertain
he → claim → AI
“In the past 72 hours I have ONE-SHOT decompiled 3 of my main competitors products. asserted
I → decompile → products
Like, I could in theory just stick them in a box and resell them […] Basically, anyone with a Claude subscription can now rip off [sic] any best-in-class algorithm from any competitor. uncertain
anyone → stick → competitor
It is not necessarily the case that everyone will be writing and running their own software or that Adobe or Microsoft are screwed. asserted
Adobe → write → software
But I’ve seen enough to say that the “decompiling” or “reverse-engineer anything” craze is going to have an actual real-world impact on software companies, coding communities, and open-source projects. asserted
craze → see → companies
One of the criticisms I heard last week after writing about video game “decompiling” communities being overrun with AI-powered decompilations, ports, and clones is that a lot of the AI decompilations are not actually “decompiling” anything — that the resulting source code usually isn’t the same as the original, and that the resulting software has weird bugs, is of low quality, or doesn’t fully work. asserted
software → hear → quality
But that’s one of the main problems here: AI-powered, cloned software often has bugs that the person using the AI doesn’t understand or know how to fix, and people are doing it anyway, using the software anyway, and unleashing it on the world and on these communities at a speed with which it cannot be vetted or moderated. asserted
it → ’ → which
Part of the reason that this will have an impact is specifically because, at least in the short term, a lot of this software will suck: The ability to cheaply and quickly clone software and modify features is going to have some sort of sloppifying impact on society whether you vibecode software or not. asserted
you → have → software
Unlike some of Silicon Valley’s wildest sickos, I do not expect most people to vibe code their own software or to hack their baby monitors, but like AI slop on social media or on menus, flyers, and billboards, you do not need to actually use AI or think that it’s good in order to be affected by this. asserted
it → expect → this
Inevitably, poorly coded, barely-functional, insecure software is going to be installed on critical hardware, which will lead to devices and networks being hacked; reverse-engineering communities and open source projects are going to be overrun with people Kool-Aid manning in with “their” AI projects and code. asserted
people → cod → projects
All of this has been enabled by the agentification of AI, improving models, and the removal of guardrails. asserted
All → enable → guardrails
It is now possible to tell an AI to go do something, and to generally have it do that thing. asserted
it → tell → thing
This is leading to more people making more things and more AI agents acting in annoying and perhaps antisocial ways on the internet—we are likely to see an onslaught of semi-functional software and hardware slop, which will have knock-on effects for us all. asserted
which → lead → us
We are going to see hastily-created hardware startups using poorly cloned software that barely works, we are going to go to restaurants and be asked to order through a touch screen using cloned software with bizarre bugs. asserted
we → go → bugs
We are going to see people installing and using random code that they know nothing about on internet-connected physical hardware; and we are likely to see hackers try to infiltrate this process to include malware on some of that code. asserted
hackers → go → code
We are going to see smaller software and hardware companies killed by competitors who used AI to steal their products and undercut them. asserted
who → go → them
But what people use this for is likely to be a bit of a mixed bag; we are also likely going to see decompiled software used to remove manufacturer guardrails on products that never should have existed in the first place. asserted
that → use → place
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support