With Peshawar High Court set to hear today (Tuesday) multiple petitions against imposition of emergency and governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, PTI chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan has sought permission of the court to file an amended petition to challenge the resolutions passed by a joint sitting of the Parliament as well as National Assembly and Senate separately endorsing the said move.
asserted
Khan → set → move
According to the cause list released by the high court, a two-member bench comprising the senior puisne judge, Justice Ijaz Anwar, and Justice Mohammad Faheem Wali will hear seven constitutional petitions, requesting the court to declare as unconstitutional the Oct 11 presidential proclamation under articles 232 and 234 imposing emergency and governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
uncertain
bench → accord → Pakhtunkhwa
The main petition is that of Barrister Gohar Ali, whereas leaders of Tehreek-i-Tahafuz Ayeen-i-Pakistan (TTAP) including its chairman Mahmood Khan Achakzai, its vice chairman Raja Nasir Abbas, Balochistan National Party (Mengal) chief Sardar Akhtar Mengal, Sindh United Party president Zainul Abideen and others have filed two petitions.
asserted
leaders → include → petitions
Barrister Gohar seeks permission to file amended petition to also challenge parliamentary resolutions endorsing govt move
The other petitions are that of National Democratic Movement’s central and provincial presidents Mohsin Dawar and Bushra Gohar, MNA Shandana Gulzar, and lawyers Suleman Khan and Qaiser Ali Shah.
asserted
petitions → seek → presidents
The petitioners will be represented by Barrister Sameer Khosa, Salman Akram Raja, Ali
Zaman, Mohammad Yousaf Orakzai, Bassam Ahmad Siddiqui, Suleman Khan and Qaiser Shah, etc.
asserted
petitioners → represent → Khosa
The federal government on Oct 11 imposed emergency in KP, and placed the province under governor’s rule, taking note of the ‘provincial government’s deliberate disengagement from the fight against terrorism’.
asserted
government → impose → terrorism
The move followed weeks of political tensions between the Centre and PTI – as well as negotiations to bridge their differences – after the latter announced a protest march to Islamabad to demand the release of its jailed founder Imran Khan.
asserted
latter → follow → founder
Barrister Gohar on Monday filed an application in the high court, seeking permission to add two further prayers in his constitutional petition.
asserted
Gohar → file → petition
He requested the court to permit him to make consequential amendments to the facts and grounds of the petition and to file an amended petition within such time as the court may fix.
uncertain
court → request → time
The prayers which Barrister Gohar requested for inclusion in his petition are: “Declare that the impugned resolutions, namely the separate resolutions passed by National Assembly and Senate on 14 Oct, 2026, and the resolutions passed by Majlis-i-Shoora (Parliament) in joint sitting on 15 Oct, 2026, approving the impugned proclamation, and the impugned SRO are unconstitutional,
without lawful authority and of no legal effect insofar as they approve, sustain or give effect to the impugned proclamation, and do not validate the impugned proclamation or any action taken under it.”
asserted
they → request → it
He also requested to “suspend the operation of the impugned SRO and restrain the respondents from taking any further step pursuant to the impugned resolutions or the impugned SRO.”
asserted
He → request → resolutions
The application was filed by Advocate Shah Faisal Ilyas on behalf of Mr Gohar.
asserted
application → file → Gohar
The applicant stated that on Oct 14 the National Assembly and the Senate passed separate resolutions approving the proclamation of emergency “under second proviso of clause (1) of Article 232”.
asserted
applicant → state → Article
He stated that on Oct 15 the Parliament in a joint sitting passed two further resolutions, the first approving the proclamation of emergency under clause (7) of Article 232, and the second approving the proclamation under clause (3) of Article 234.
asserted
Parliament → state → Article
He added that a consequential SRO was also issued by the government announcing the passage of the said resolutions.
asserted
SRO → add → resolutions
“The proclamation of emergency has purportedly been approved by each of the impugned resolutions.
asserted
proclamation → approve → resolutions
Since these are subsequent developments and seek to clothe the inherently unlawful and unconstitutional impugned proclamation with legality, the petitioner is aggrieved of the same,” he said.
asserted
he → seek → same
The Aporia
