The Peshawar High Court on Friday fixed October 20 for the preliminary hearing of a petition filed by PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan challenging the imposition of emergency and governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and seeking to have the move declared unconstitutional.
asserted
move → fix → Pakhtunkhwa
The federal government on October 11 imposed emergency in KP, and placed the province under governor’s rule, taking note of the “provincial government’s deliberate disengagement from the fight against terrorism”.
asserted
government → impose → terrorism
The move followed weeks of political tensions between the Centre and the PTI — as well as negotiations to bridge their differences — after the latter announced a long march to Islamabad to demand the release of its jailed founder, Imran Khan.
asserted
latter → follow → founder
The opposition had criticised the move, vowing to raise its voice at every forum, including the judiciary.
asserted
opposition → criticise → judiciary
The instant petition was filed on October 14 by the PTI chairman.
asserted
petition → file → chairman
He will be represented by a panel of lawyers, including Barrister Sameer Khosa, Salman Akram Raja, Ali Zaman, Sardar Haseeb Ahmad and Zainab Shahid.
asserted
He → represent → Khosa
The members of the bench that will hear the petition will be announced later.
asserted
that → hear → petition
In his petition, Gohar urged the PHC to declare the federal government’s decision to impose emergency and governor’s rule in KP “unconstitutional, ultra vires, coram non judice, tainted with malice in law and fact, devoid of objective material, and of no legal effect” and to set aside the proclamation.
asserted
Gohar → urge → proclamation
Filed under Article 199 of the Constitution, the petition named the federation of Pakistan (through the secretaries of the Cabinet Division, law, interior, and defence ministries); the province of KP; KP Governor Faisal Karim Kundi; the KP Assembly speaker; and the secretary of the KP Home and Tribal Affairs Department as respondents.
asserted
petition → file → respondents
Sohail Afridi, who is no longer functioning as the province’s chief minister following the imposition of governor’s rule, was also named as a pro forma respondent.
asserted
who → function → respondent
Gohar challenged the “constitutionality, legality and vires” of the October 11 decision, the order deploying army troops to the province, and “all consequential and derivative executive orders, notifications, and bodies” constituted as a result.
asserted
Gohar → challenge → result
These included the establishment of the KP Advisory Council and the “arbitrary” detention and removal of Afridi as the lawful chief minister of KP, along with his provincial cabinet, which had been vested with full executive powers under Article 130 of the Constitution.
asserted
which → include → Constitution
Following the imposition of emergency and governor’s rule in the province, the federal government formed an 11-member technocratic KP Advisory Council.
asserted
government → follow → Council
The council will assist Governor Kundi, who is now in charge of running the province, in exercising the functions of the KP government on behalf of the federal government.
asserted
who → assist → government
The PHC was further requested to declare that Paragraph 2 of the proclamation — which transferred the legislative powers of the KP Assembly to Parliament in the absence of a prior resolution passed by the assembly, as required under Article 232(1) — was “void ab initio and an unconstitutional usurpation of provincial autonomy”.
asserted
which → request → autonomy
The petition also urged the PHC to restrain the federation from “tabling, entertaining, or enacting any provincial legislative business concerning Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Parliament”.
asserted
petition → urge → Parliament
The petitioner asked the court to declare the proclamation illegal and unconstitutional and to set aside, dissolve or permanently restrain all executive orders, notifications, actions and bodies created “pursuant to or under the colour of” the proclamation.
asserted
proclamation → ask → proclamation
These included the constitution of the 11-member KP Advisory Council, headed by Governor Kundi; the establishment of the Area Development Secretariat (ADS) across 12 districts of the province; and the removal of the KP advocate general and the purported appointment of a replacement.
asserted
These → include → replacement
The ADS was established to “restore law and order, safeguard the security of the citizens of Pakistan and ensure good governance and development” in Dera Ismail Khan, Tank, Lakki Marwat, Bannu, Bajaur, Mohmand, Khyber, Kurram, Orakzai, North Waziristan, South Waziristan (Upper) and South Waziristan (Lower).
asserted
ADS → establish → Khan
The petitioner also challenged the October 11 order deploying army troops under Article 245, asking the court to declare it unconstitutional on the grounds that it could not “supplant or bypass the civilian executive and constitutional administration” of the province and could not be invoked in the absence of a lawful requisition by the provincial government headed by Afridi.
uncertain
it → challenge → Afridi
Gohar sought directives requiring the respondents, including the federal government and the KP governor, to immediately disclose, produce and place before the PHC “the entire record and so-called ‘objective material’”, including Governor Kundi’s report and the federal cabinet’s summary, on which the emergency proclamation and subsequent orders were allegedly based.
uncertain
proclamation → seek → which
He also sought directives for the immediate release of Afridi and members of the KP cabinet and assembly from “unlawful executive or preventive detention”.
asserted
He → seek → detention
The petition further urged the court to direct the respondents to immediately produce Afridi before the PHC and restrain the state from placing him or any cabinet members in preventive detention or transferring them outside the court’s jurisdiction.
asserted
petition → urge → jurisdiction
The petition claimed that, by unilaterally bypassing the elected provincial assembly over an alleged question of internal disturbance, the impugned proclamation violated “the federal structure guaranteed under Article 1, the principles of democracy and provincial autonomy enshrined in the Objectives Resolution (Article 2A), and the legislative domain of the province recognised by Article 142 of the Constitution”.
asserted
proclamation → claim → Constitution
On these grounds, the proclamation was “ultra vires the proviso to Article 232(1) read with Article 1, 2A, and 142 of the Constitution” and liable to be set aside, it added.
asserted
it → read → Constitution
Gohar further contended that the proclamation made no mention of any “grave emergency” arising from a war or other external aggression, as required by the text of Article 232(1) — nor would such an assertion be supported by facts.
asserted
assertion → contend → facts
He maintained that neither the country nor KP faced a grave emergency from any ongoing war or external aggression, nor was there any known risk or threat of such.
asserted
country → maintain → such
The petition further contended that the reliance on “internal disturbances” in the province needed to be assessed against a demonstrable and objective criterion, which was “entirely absent” from the impugned proclamation.
asserted
which → contend → proclamation
“Despite an unfortunately high number of incidents of terrorist violence in Balochistan, no state of emergency has been declared or even contemplated,” the petition stated.
asserted
petition → declare → emergency
“This clearly demonstrates that the terrorism and security pretext in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is nothing but a colourable device, deployed in sheer violation of Article 25.”
asserted
pretext → demonstrate → Article
The petition alleged that this pretext had been used solely because the KP government was formed by the opposition and its demands regarding PTI founder Imran Khan were unacceptable to the federal government.
asserted
demands → allege → government
It added that the federal government’s claim was also belied by the fact that even at the height of terrorism between 2007 and 2015, “no emergency was ever imposed anywhere inside Pakistan”.
uncertain
emergency → add → Pakistan
Gohar also argued that the invocation of Article 234 was “without lawful authority, tainted with malice in law, and devoid of jurisdictional basis”.
asserted
invocation → argue → basis
NDM petition
Another petition challenging the imposition of emergency, filed by National Democratic Movement (NDM) central and provincial presidents Mohsin Dawar and Bushra Gohar, respectively, has also been fixed for hearing on October 20.
asserted
petition → challenge → October
The joint petition stated that the proclamation of emergency and governor’s rule was “purely and patently against the mandate of people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, hence, liable to be set at naught”.
asserted
proclamation → state → naught
The petitioners prayed that the court declare the proclamation issued by the president of Pakistan on October 11, 2026, to be without legal effect and jurisdiction.
asserted
proclamation → pray → effect
They also requested the court to set aside the directions, appointments and actions taken, as well as omissions made, pursuant to the proclamation, to ensure constitutional conformity.
asserted
They → request → conformity
They further sought interim relief, asking the court to suspend the operation of the impugned presidential proclamation until the final disposal of the writ petition.
asserted
They → seek → petition
The petitioners stated that the president of Pakistan was under a solemn constitutional duty, under Article 42 of the Constitution read with the Third Schedule, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and not allow personal interests to influence official conduct or decisions.
asserted
interests → state → conduct
They claimed that the KP governor, acting with mala fide intent and without jurisdiction, submitted a tailor-made report to the president of Pakistan.
asserted
governor → claim → Pakistan
…and 4 more, not listed.
The Aporia
