Two Indian nationals among 28 charged with election fraud in California

Read the original at The Hindu ↗
Cite

Two Indian nationals among 28 charged with election fraud in California. (2026, October 20). The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/two-indian-nationals-among-28-charged-with-election-fraud-in-california/article71603104.ece

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Hindu · collected 2026-10-20 · by PTI

Quick Summary

The U.S. Department of Justice has charged 28 green card holders, including two Indian nationals—Amandeep Kaur and Kamlesh Shah—with election fraud in California. The charges stem from fraudulent voter registration and casting ballots in the November 2024 elections, which are felonies carrying up to five years in prison. Among those charged, eleven individuals were arrested during early morning raids under "Operation Protect the Vote," aimed at combating electoral fraud.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On October 19, 2026, federal authorities arrested 28 foreign nationals in California as part of "Operation Protect the Vote," a sweep targeting noncitizen voters ahead of the midterm elections. The Justice Department charged these lawful permanent residents with election crimes such as making false statements on naturalization applications and submitting fraudulent voter registrations. Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter emphasized that the DOJ will not tolerate noncitizens voting in federal elections, contrasting this stance with California officials who argue compliance with the demands would be unlawful without specific information from the federal government.

Attorney General Rob Bonta countered by stating these arrests represent an extremely small percentage of registered voters and do not indicate widespread voter fraud. Meanwhile, the Public Interest Legal Foundation documented how sanctuary city policies exacerbate the issue of noncitizen voting in California, underscoring concerns over electoral integrity ahead of the November elections.

Written for “California Noncitizen Voting Arrests” on 2026-10-20, grounded in this article and the 6 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 92304 · logged 2026-10-20

Story

📰 California Noncitizen Voting Arrests
Politics · 7 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 32 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses California officials refusing a DOJ request related to noncitizen voter records, while Article B reports on specific charges and arrests in an election fraud case involving Indian nationals.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 24% hedged 4 of 17 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses general election issues and lack of Voter ID laws, while Article B reports on a specific prosecution and arrest related to election fraud involving Indian nationals.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 21% hedged 4 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different events: one is a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against California for failing to review suspected noncitizen voters, while the other reports on specific arrests and charges of election fraud involving individuals.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 68
“The articles describe different events related to election fraud but do not refer to the same specific incident, time, or place.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the Justice Department related to voter registration issues but do not describe the same specific incident.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different legal actions by the Justice Department, one involving a lawsuit against California for voter information, and the other involving charges of election fraud.”
Times of India
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 3 of 12 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles describe different individuals charged with election fraud in separate states.”
New York Post
⚖️ Centre 🔴 13% hedged 2 of 15 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different events: one about ballots stolen from a post office, and another about individuals charged with voter fraud.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 18% hedged 2 of 11 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses a threat by the Trump administration against California officials if noncitizens vote, while Article B reports on specific charges and arrests of individuals for election fraud.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 15% hedged 3 of 20 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A describes a warning letter from the DOJ to California officials, while Article B reports on specific arrests and charges of election fraud against individuals.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
11
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
1 of 11 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
95/100
The Hindu's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
7
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Hindu · 345 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article, beyond the feed's “ PTI”.

Topics

California Indian U.S. the Justice Department the United States

Subjects

the Justice Department ORG · 4× U.S. GPE · 3× California GPE · 2× Indian NORP · 2× the United States GPE · 2× Amandeep Kaur PERSON · 1× Kamlesh Shah PERSON · 1× Sacramento GPE · 1× Shah PERSON · 1× the U.S. Department of Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

Ms. Kaur, a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes, who is seeking to become a U.S. citizen, fraudulently registered to vote in December 2022 and voted in the November 2024 US election, it said. “All 28 foreign nationals charged are lawful permanent residents (LPRs), or 'green card' holders.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20

Claims (11 extracted, 1 hedged)

Two Indian nationals are among 28 green card holders charged with election fraud in California, the U.S. Department of Justice said in a statement on Monday. asserted
Department → charge → Monday
According to the Justice Department, Amandeep Kaur (30) and Kamlesh Shah (67) have been charged with fraudulently registering as voters and casting their ballots in the November 2024 U.S. elections. uncertain
Kaur → accord → elections
It said of the 28 persons charged with election fraud, 11 have been arrested in early morning raids across the state under ‘Operation Protect the Vote’ to combat and root out fraud in U.S. elections and uphold electoral integrity. asserted
11 → say → integrity
It was not immediately clear whether the two Indian nationals were among those arrested. asserted
nationals → arrest → those
Mr. Shah is a resident of Sacramento and fraudulently registered to vote on the day of the November 2024 general election and voted that day, the Justice Department said. asserted
Department → register → election
Ms. Kaur, a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes, who is seeking to become a U.S. citizen, fraudulently registered to vote in December 2022 and voted in the November 2024 US election, it said. “All 28 foreign nationals charged are lawful permanent residents (LPRs), or 'green card' holders. asserted
nationals → seek → election
Although LPRs have legal immigration status in the United States, they are not US citizens and are not permitted to vote in US elections,” the Justice Department said. asserted
Department → have → elections
The criminal charges include making false statements in a naturalisation application and some of the defendants also are charged with fraudulent voter registration. asserted
some → include → registration
Both charges are felonies that carry a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. asserted
that → carry → prison
“Each of the 28 defendants charged today appears on the list of more than 20,000 likely noncitizen registrants we provided to California election officials last week,” Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter told reporters in Los Angeles. asserted
McCotter → charge → Angeles
Before Monday (October 19, 2026), the Justice Department had charged about 90 people for various types of election misconduct so far this year, including 50 who are alleged to have voted as noncitizens. asserted
who → charge → noncitizens
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support