US justice department sues California over alleged noncitizen voting

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Levine, S. (2026, October 15). US justice department sues California over alleged noncitizen voting. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/15/justice-department-sues-california-midterms

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-15 · by Sam Levine

Quick Summary

The US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against California on Thursday to prevent the state from counting certain ballots cast in the midterm elections, alleging that some voters are noncitizens. The department previously provided Los Angeles county with a list of more than 20,000 names it claims belong to likely noncitizen voters and demanded confirmation of their citizenship status within two days. California officials, including Secretary of State Shirley Weber, rejected the demand as unsecure and unnecessary, asserting that it could cause public distrust in elections.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-15, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 15, 2026, the US Justice Department sued California in federal court, alleging that more than 20,000 noncitizens were unlawfully registered to vote. This follows a letter from Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter on October 14, which demanded California officials review a list of suspected noncitizens who had received mail-in ballots for the upcoming midterm elections within 48 hours. The Justice Department sent Los Angeles County a password-protected thumb drive containing the names compiled by the Department of Homeland Security. However, California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and LA County Clerk Dean Logan refused to comply due to security concerns and lack of details on how the list was created.

Written for “Justice Department Sues California Over Noncitizen Voting” on 2026-10-15, grounded in this article and the 5 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 83217: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-15

Story

📰 Justice Department Sues California Over Noncitizen Voting
Politics · 6 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News · 0.92 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles describe the US Department of Justice filing a lawsuit against California on the same day, October 15, 2026, regarding alleged noncitizen voting.”
New York Post · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 21% hedged 4 of 19 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the Trump administration filing a lawsuit against California on the same day, October 15, 2026, regarding suspected noncitizen voters on the state's voter rolls.”
Toronto Star · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles describe a legal action initiated by the Justice Department against California regarding noncitizens receiving mail ballots, with one article reporting on the threat of legal action and the subsequent lawsuit.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 24% hedged 4 of 17 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A discusses broader issues with California's voting system and mentions investigations by Team Trump, while Article B reports on a specific lawsuit filed by the US Justice Department against California.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 15 📰 publisher trust 68
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the Trump administration against California, one involving ICE enforcement and the other regarding alleged noncitizen voting.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 26 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a threat of legal action, while Article B reports on an actual lawsuit filed two days later.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 32 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A discusses California officials' refusal to comply with a DOJ request, while Article B reports on the DOJ suing California over alleged noncitizen voting, which appears to be a subsequent legal action rather than the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
3 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
68/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
6
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1336 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sam Levine
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The department asked officials to confirm the citizenship of anyone on the list and set aside ballots from those whose status could not be confirmed.
🔮 Voters could say they needed an overseas ballot because they were on active military service, living outside the US with an intent to return, or living outside the US and uncertain about their return.
🔮 Follow-up letters to each of those states weakened the claim, saying there only could be as many as 278,000 non-citizens on the rolls, including up to 15,903 in Nevada.
🔮 The reported meeting comes months ahead of the November midterm elections in which Democrats are favored to retake the US House, a development that would make Jeffries speaker.
🔮 In an unsigned statement, it described a “short-term social experiment” to examine how fake polling “could enter and spread through the political information ecosystem without independent verification”.
Also by Sam Levine
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

California DHS Los Angeles Nevada the Federal Government

Subjects

California GPE · 8× Nevada GPE · 3× DHS ORG · 2× Los Angeles GPE · 2× the Federal Government ORG · 2× Dean Logan PERSON · 1× Democrat NORP · 1× Shirley Weber PERSON · 1× The US Department of Justice ORG · 1× Weber PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Richard Hasen, an election law scholar at UCLA, described the justice department’s efforts in California as “a nice publicity stunt that gets attention for [the justice department] and reinforces the notion among the president’s most ardent supporters that California is not doing enough to combat voter fraud”.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-15
🔮 The department asked officials to confirm the citizenship of anyone on the list and set aside ballots from those whose status could not be confirmed.
2026-10-15 · The Guardian
US justice department sues California over alleged noncitizen voting · assertive framing

Claims (23 extracted, 3 hedged)

The US Department of Justice sued California on Thursday, seeking a court order to prevent the state from tabulating certain ballots cast in the midterm elections. asserted
Department → sue → elections
The suit came two days after the department made a specious demand to the state. asserted
department → come → state
On Tuesday, the department sent election officials in Los Angeles county a thumb drive with a handwritten password purporting to contain the names of noncitizens registered to vote. asserted
department → send → noncitizens
The department asked officials to confirm the citizenship of anyone on the list and set aside ballots from those whose status could not be confirmed. uncertain
status → ask → those
It gave the state 48 hours – an extremely narrow window – to take action. asserted
It → give → action
It did not provide details on how it came up with the names on the list. asserted
it → provide → list
In its lawsuit, filed in federal court in the central district of California, the justice department said it had provided the state with more than 20,000 names of likely noncitizens. asserted
it → file → noncitizens
The Los Angeles county clerk and recorder, Dean Logan, said his office would not review the list, in part because it didn’t consider the USB drive secure. asserted
drive → say → part
In a statement on Wednesday, the California secretary of state, Shirley Weber, a Democrat, said the justice department had not provided the list of voters to her office. asserted
department → say → office
“The [justice department’s] relentless efforts to unlawfully gain access to states’ protected voter data and purge voter rolls serve only to cause chaos and fuel public distrust in our elections,” Weber said. asserted
Weber → gain → elections
Justice department lawyers are asking the court to order the state not to count votes from those it had flagged. asserted
it → ask → those
“This Court should enjoin California from presently tabulating vote-by-mail ballots from likely noncitizens in the upcoming federal election until the voter’s citizenship status can be determined,” the lawsuit said. asserted
lawsuit → enjoin → election
“This Court should order California (1) to set aside vote-by-mail ballots from persons identified by the Federal Government likely to be noncitizens and (2) to independently – or in collaboration with the Federal Government – verify their citizenship status (beyond relying on unverified statements of citizenship necessary to registering) before tabulating their vote-by-mail ballot. uncertain
Court → order → ballot
The request to block tabulation comes amid concerns that Donald Trump and his allies will interfere in the counting of votes in the midterm elections, in which Republicans are expected to lose seats in Congress. asserted
Republicans → block → Congress
The Trump administration’s methodology for identifying noncitizens has come under scrutiny. asserted
methodology → identify → scrutiny
Earlier this year, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said there could be as many as 278,000 noncitizens on the rolls in four states, including more than 190,000 in California and about 16,000 in Nevada. uncertain
Department → say → Nevada
Officials at the DHS refused to share their methodology with Nevada election officials and later turned over just 185 names of people it had a strong belief were noncitizens. asserted
it → refuse → belief
When Nevada officials investigated, they found every one of those people was a citizen. asserted
one → investigate → people
Richard Hasen, an election law scholar at UCLA, described the justice department’s efforts in California as “a nice publicity stunt that gets attention for [the justice department] and reinforces the notion among the president’s most ardent supporters that California is not doing enough to combat voter fraud”. asserted
California → describe → fraud
“The Department of Justice has no standing to tell states and localities to go in and remove voters from voting rolls in the midst of an election. asserted
Department → have → election
In fact, the National Voter Registration Act bars systematic purges of ineligible voters in the 90-day period before the election,” he wrote in a blogpost. asserted
he → bar → blogpost
“The purpose of this provision, unsurprisingly, is to stop false positives, that is the removal of eligible voters who are mistakenly flagged as noncitizens. asserted
who → stop → noncitizens
A rushed process would almost certainly lead to disenfranchisement.” asserted
process → lead → disenfranchisement
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support