California pours $369M in wildfire recovery funds into low-income housing — but reserves none for fire victims

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Paige, J. (2026, October 19). California pours $369M in wildfire recovery funds into low-income housing — but reserves none for fire victims. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/18/us-news/california-pours-369m-in-wildfire-recovery-funds-into-low-income-housing-but-reserves-none-for-fire-victims/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-19 · by Jamie Paige

Quick Summary

California allocated nearly $369 million in federal wildfire recovery funds to low-income housing developers without setting aside any portion specifically for fire victims who need help rebuilding their homes. This allocation came despite thousands of people still struggling after the devastating 2018 wildfires, which killed 103 individuals and damaged over 24,000 structures. One affected resident, Mickey Schechter, lost his home in the Woolsey Fire but has received no direct assistance from these funds and remains displaced in a guesthouse he cannot afford to rebuild.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-19, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

California allocated nearly $369 million in federal wildfire recovery funds intended for victims of the 2018 Camp Fire and Woolsey Fire towards low-income housing projects without setting aside any money specifically to aid actual fire survivors. This decision came despite thousands of Californians still struggling to rebuild their homes after these devastating fires, which killed 103 people and damaged or destroyed over 24,000 structures. One notable victim is motivational speaker Mickey Schechter, who remains in a cramped guesthouse that survived the Woolsey Fire, unable to afford the estimated $2 million needed to rebuild his home. The use of federal funds for low-income housing has sparked outrage among those directly affected by the wildfires.

Written for “California Wildfire Aid Controversy” on 2026-10-19, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 89832 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-19

Story

📰 California Wildfire Aid Controversy
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 20 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the same specific revelation regarding California using federal wildfire aid intended for victims on low-income housing, citing a report by The California Post.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
50
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
5 of 50 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 11584 article(s) · 32 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 32 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jamie Paige
25 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Nearly eight years later, he is still living in a cramped, 350-square-foot guesthouse that survived the blaze, unable to afford the estimated $2 million it would now cost to rebuild his home.
🔮 An LA nonprofit bankrolled with millions in taxpayer funds through mayoral candidate Nithya Raman’s eviction-defense program more than tripled its revenue in five years, even as reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged, a California Post investigation found.
🔮 Nithya Raman was back in the hot seat Tuesday night over her pledge to fire LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, refusing to say when she’d pull the trigger as a top ally of Mayor Karen Bass blasted her for misleading voters.
🔮 Pressed about Bass’ warning that firing McDonnell ahead of the LA 2028 Olympics could be disastrous, Raman suggested waiting until 2030.
🔮 Nithya Raman has issued a word-salad denial on whether she will make controversial former District Attorney George Gascón head of the LAPD if she becomes mayor of Los Angeles.
🔮 A bombshell poll showing LA mayoral challenger Nithya Raman with a stunning 24-point lead over Karen Bass among Latino voters will loom large as the rivals face off in a high-stakes televised showdown Thursday night.
🔮 LA Mayor Karen Bass has blasted Nithya Raman as “incredibly irresponsible” and claimed she was “not ready for prime time” after the candidate called LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell a “fascist liar.”
🔮 LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell called Raman’s comments “disappointing,” saying that 52 police officers were injured during last year’s violent immigration protests. “I saw that, and I was disappointed that she would be associated with anything like that,” McDonnell told NBC Los Angeles.
🔮 Ed Choi, who posts as @etchaskej and has amassed nearly 800,000 followers across TikTok and Instagram, interviewed the Los Angeles mayoral hopeful in the video that erupted into controversy Monday night.
🔮 Los Angeles mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman is facing backlash over a social media campaign interview with an influencer where she appears to call LAPD police chief Jim McDonnell ”a fascist liar” with a red X across his face.
Also by Jamie Paige
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 25 articles by Jamie Paige →

Topics

California California Post HCD the Camp Fire the Woolsey Fire

Subjects

California GPE · 5× Schechter PERSON · 5× HCD ORG · 2× National CORE ORG · 2× California Post ORG · 1× Californians NORP · 1× Cornell ORG · 1× Los Angeles GPE · 1× Mickey Schechter PERSON · 1× the California Post ORG · 1×

Narrative

The federal government allocated more than $1 billion to California to help communities recover from the 2018 wildfires, including the Camp Fire that killed 85 people in Paradise and the Woolsey Fire that devastated communities north of Los Angeles.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-19
🔮 Nearly eight years later, he is still living in a cramped, 350-square-foot guesthouse that survived the blaze, unable to afford the estimated $2 million it would now cost to rebuild his home.

Claims (50 extracted, 5 hedged)

California funneled nearly $369 million in federal aid intended for victims of its deadliest wildfire year to low-income housing developers — without requiring them to house a single wildfire survivor, a California Post investigation found. asserted
investigation → funnel → survivor
The staggering sum was awarded to developers while thousands of Californians struggled to rebuild their lives after the devastating 2018 fires, which killed 103 people and damaged or destroyed more than 24,000 structures. asserted
which → award → structures
Among them is motivational speaker and comedian, Mickey Schechter, 62, who lost his Cornell home and $60,000 in plumbing tools when the Woolsey Fire tore through the Santa Monica Mountains, destroying 37 homes in his community. asserted
Fire → lose → community
Nearly eight years later, he is still living in a cramped, 350-square-foot guesthouse that survived the blaze, unable to afford the estimated $2 million it would now cost to rebuild his home. asserted
it → live → home
Schechter was furious when told where a large chunk of the federal cash had gone. asserted
chunk → tell → cash
“That’s our money. asserted
That → ’ → ?
We’re the ones that suffer for it. asserted
that → ’re → it
That’s bulls—t. asserted
That → ’ → ?
I’m pissed,” Schechter told the California Post. asserted
Schechter → ’m → Post
“Now I wanna know how can I possibly get money from that grant?” he said. uncertain
he → know → grant
“That’s not your money. asserted
That → ’ → ?
That’s our money.” asserted
That → ’ → ?
The federal government allocated more than $1 billion to California to help communities recover from the 2018 wildfires, including the Camp Fire that killed 85 people in Paradise and the Woolsey Fire that devastated communities north of Los Angeles. asserted
that → allocate → Angeles
The Woolsey Fire killed three people, destroyed 1,643 structures and caused more than $6 billion in damage. asserted
Fire → kill → damage
The $1,017,399,000 allocation from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was intended to cover recovery costs not paid by insurance or other assistance. asserted
allocation → intend → insurance
California’s Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) oversees the money, dividing it between helping homeowners rebuild and financing affordable rental housing in fire-ravaged communities. asserted
homeowners → oversee → communities
Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters Of the $222.4 million earmarked for homeowners, just $38 million had been spent rebuilding 110 homes by the end of 2023, according to state records. uncertain
million → download → records
The Camp Fire alone destroyed 14,000 homes. asserted
Fire → destroy → homes
Developers, meanwhile, were awarded $368.7 million for low-income housing projects, without any requirement to house wildfire survivors. asserted
Developers → award → survivors
In one funding round last year, the state awarded $146.9 million to 14 developments from Santa Cruz to Covina, with a combined price tag of $632 million, roughly $754,000 per apartment. asserted
state → award → apartment
HCD could not provide a count of how many, if any, wildfire survivors live in the apartments. uncertain
survivors → provide → apartments
Meanwhile, Schechter says he has been left facing a financial nightmare. asserted
he → say → nightmare
He said the county charged roughly $178,000 for debris cleanup, while he has spent another $300,000 maintaining the property. asserted
he → say → property
Insurance paid just $450,000 for his $750,000 home, which he estimates would now cost $2 million to rebuild. asserted
he → pay → million
But state rebuilding aid was restricted to low and moderate income homeowners, with insurance payouts reducing eligibility. asserted
payouts → restrict → eligibility
Schechter says never received the help he needed. asserted
he → receive → help
The Woolsey Fire recovery program provides a stark example of how developers secured millions as survivors like Schechter struggled to rebuild. asserted
survivors → provide → Schechter
In July 2024, California offered $26.7 million in Woolsey Fire recovery funds. asserted
California → offer → funds
Only one developer applied. asserted
developer → apply → ?
Rancho Cucamonga nonprofit National CORE proposed an 81-unit apartment complex in Agoura Hills, scoring just 90 points, barely above the 88-point minimum and the lowest among projects funded that round. asserted
CORE → propose → projects
Others scored as high as 117. asserted
Others → score → 117
National CORE secured nearly the entire pot, $26.1 million, despite no requirement to house a single Woolsey Fire survivor. asserted
CORE → secure → survivor
The project’s location has also raised questions about evacuation routes in the fire-prone Santa Monica Mountains. asserted
location → raise → Mountains
The apartments are just miles away from last week’s Bryson Fire that sent residents scrambling to evacuate, reigniting fears that adding more housing along one of only two major escape routes could turn an already dangerous bottleneck into a death trap. “They are building apartments on the only way we can get out of here,” Schechter told the California Post. uncertain
Schechter → send → Post
“During the Woolsey Fire, people were sitting in their cars for two hours trying to get out. asserted
people → sit → hours
“With all these extra people, people will die.” asserted
people → die → people
The project shrank to 54 units after officials denied a density bonus, but its $26.1 million award remained untouched, including $484,000 in federal disaster aid. asserted
award → shrink → aid
Agoura Hills officials said they had no say in the project or its multimillion-dollar funding award. asserted
they → say → project
“The City did not have any role in selecting the project, the site, or the funding amount,” Community Development Director Robby Nesovic told the California Post. asserted
Nesovic → have → Post
HCD defended the spending, arguing that new apartments replace homes lost to the fires. asserted
apartments → defend → fires
…and 10 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support