LA’s $87M taxpayer money mystery deepens as nonprofit backed by mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman faces spending scrutiny

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Paige, J. (2026, October 16). LA’s $87M taxpayer money mystery deepens as nonprofit backed by mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman faces spending scrutiny. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/16/us-news/nonprofit-backed-by-mayoral-hopeful-nithya-raman-faces-spending-scrutiny/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-16 · by Jamie Paige

Quick Summary

The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA), a nonprofit involved in eviction defense programs backed by mayoral candidate Nithya Raman, saw its revenue increase from $17.6 million in 2019 to $58.6 million in 2024, while reported spending on housing and eviction defense dropped sharply. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto has raised concerns about the discrepancy, estimating that between $55 million and $87 million of taxpayer funds cannot be accounted for based on LAFLA’s public financial records. The investigation highlights potential mismanagement or lack of transparency in how city funds are being used through these programs.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA) faces scrutiny over missing millions in taxpayer funds as its revenue more than tripled from $17.6 million in 2019 to $58.6 million in 2024, while reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged from $17.6 million in 2022 to $4.4 million in 2024. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto demands a full audit after finding that between $55 million and $87 million of city and county funding cannot be reconciled with the nonprofit’s financial records, raising questions about years of taxpayer-funded contracts under mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman's eviction-defense program. LAFLA disputes these findings, insisting every dollar is accounted for. The controversy also involves Measure ULA funds, known as the "mansion tax," which further complicates the situation.

Written for “Nithya Raman Mansion Tax Scrutiny” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.25, but all 2 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 86224: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-17

Story

📰 Nithya Raman Mansion Tax Scrutiny
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 19% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 15 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles discuss the mystery surrounding $87 million in unaccounted funds at the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA), linked to mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman's eviction-defense program.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
19%
5 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 11081 article(s) · 31 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 31 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jamie Paige
24 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 An LA nonprofit bankrolled with millions in taxpayer funds through mayoral candidate Nithya Raman’s eviction-defense program more than tripled its revenue in five years, even as reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged, a California Post investigation found.
🔮 Nithya Raman was back in the hot seat Tuesday night over her pledge to fire LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, refusing to say when she’d pull the trigger as a top ally of Mayor Karen Bass blasted her for misleading voters.
🔮 Pressed about Bass’ warning that firing McDonnell ahead of the LA 2028 Olympics could be disastrous, Raman suggested waiting until 2030.
🔮 Nithya Raman has issued a word-salad denial on whether she will make controversial former District Attorney George Gascón head of the LAPD if she becomes mayor of Los Angeles.
🔮 A bombshell poll showing LA mayoral challenger Nithya Raman with a stunning 24-point lead over Karen Bass among Latino voters will loom large as the rivals face off in a high-stakes televised showdown Thursday night.
🔮 LA Mayor Karen Bass has blasted Nithya Raman as “incredibly irresponsible” and claimed she was “not ready for prime time” after the candidate called LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell a “fascist liar.”
🔮 LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell called Raman’s comments “disappointing,” saying that 52 police officers were injured during last year’s violent immigration protests. “I saw that, and I was disappointed that she would be associated with anything like that,” McDonnell told NBC Los Angeles.
🔮 Ed Choi, who posts as @etchaskej and has amassed nearly 800,000 followers across TikTok and Instagram, interviewed the Los Angeles mayoral hopeful in the video that erupted into controversy Monday night.
🔮 Los Angeles mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman is facing backlash over a social media campaign interview with an influencer where she appears to call LAPD police chief Jim McDonnell ”a fascist liar” with a red X across his face.
🔮 Nithya Raman has declared she’ll fire LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell if she’s elected mayor for not stopping ICE from arresting illegal immigrants last June – despite spending the afternoon sipping cocktails as mass protests first rocked Los Angeles.
Also by Jamie Paige
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 24 articles by Jamie Paige →

Topics

California Post IRS LAFLA Post The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles

Subjects

LAFLA ORG · 11× Feldstein Soto PERSON · 3× Nithya Raman PERSON · 2× Post ORG · 2× California Post ORG · 1× Hydee Feldstein Soto PERSON · 1× IRS ORG · 1× Stay Housed LA ORG · 1× The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles ORG · 1× the City of Los Angeles GPE · 1×

Narrative

An LA nonprofit bankrolled with millions in taxpayer funds through mayoral candidate Nithya Raman’s eviction-defense program more than tripled its revenue in five years, even as reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged, a California Post investigation found.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-17
🔮 An LA nonprofit bankrolled with millions in taxpayer funds through mayoral candidate Nithya Raman’s eviction-defense program more than tripled its revenue in five years, even as reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged, a California Post investigation found.

Claims (26 extracted, 5 hedged)

An LA nonprofit bankrolled with millions in taxpayer funds through mayoral candidate Nithya Raman’s eviction-defense program more than tripled its revenue in five years, even as reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged, a California Post investigation found. asserted
investigation → bankroll → years
The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA) saw its annual revenue soar from $17.6 million in 2019 to $58.6 million in 2024, while its net assets doubled to nearly $44 million, according to its IRS returns. uncertain
assets → see → returns
But City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto’s office found that LAFLA’s reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged from $17.6 million in 2022 to $4.4 million in 2024. asserted
spending → find → 2024
Feldstein Soto is now demanding a full audit, warning that $55 million to $87 million in city and county funding cannot be reconciled with the nonprofit’s public financial records. asserted
million → demand → records
LAFLA fiercely disputes the findings, insisting every dollar is accounted for. asserted
dollar → dispute → findings
The figures provide a closer look at the nonprofit’s finances a day after The Post reported on the City Attorney’s Oct. 9 findings, which raised questions about years of taxpayer-funded contracts. asserted
which → provide → contracts
“Taxpayers deserve transparency and accountability and to know that their money is being used as intended, in this case to protect vulnerable tenants at risk of unlawful detainers in the City of Los Angeles,” Feldstein Soto told The Post Thursday. asserted
Soto → deserve → Angeles
LAFLA helps operate Stay Housed LA, a city and county program providing free legal assistance to renters facing eviction. asserted
LAFLA → operate → eviction
The program is a signature achievement for Councilmember Nithya Raman, who is challenging Mayor Karen Bass in the Nov. 3 election and has made tenant protections a centerpiece of her campaign. asserted
protections → challenge → campaign
The council approved a $177 million tenant-protection contract with a 12-1 vote on March 10, following a closed-door briefing with Feldstein Soto, as previously reported by The Post. asserted
council → approve → Post
$106.6 million of that was earmarked for LAFLA over three years. asserted
million → earmark → years
“Graffiti contractors are required to provide more documentation just to get paid,” Councilmember Monica Rodriguez warned during the debate. asserted
Rodriguez → require → debate
The financial questions stretch back to LAFLA’s original $7 million eviction-defense contract in 2021, awarded without competitive bidding under a pandemic emergency exception. asserted
questions → stretch → exception
According to the City Attorney’s report, nine amendments and extensions eventually pushed that contract beyond $90 million, without the city obtaining or enforcing all the detailed financial reporting required under the original agreement. Of LAFLA’s $58.6 million in revenue in 2024, approximately $54.1 million came from government contracts, accounting for more than 92%. uncertain
million → accord → %
The nonprofit also reported $58.9 million in total expenses that year and nearly $44 million in net assets. asserted
nonprofit → report → assets
The latest publicly available federal tax return reviewed covers 2024. asserted
return → review → 2024
A 2025 Form 990 was not available, meaning the City Attorney’s analysis of tax-return spending focuses on earlier years. asserted
analysis → mean → years
City and county governments provided LAFLA approximately $103.8 million between 2020 and 2024, according to Feldstein Soto’s Oct. 9 report. uncertain
governments → provide → report
During those same five years, LAFLA’s tax returns reported $48.9 million in spending under housing and eviction defense, according to the City Attorney’s analysis. uncertain
returns → report → analysis
That spending peaked at $17.6 million in 2022, fell to $8.9 million in 2023 and dropped again to $4.4 million in 2024, the report states. asserted
report → peak → 2024
The City Attorney calculated a potential discrepancy of $54.9 million to $86.6 million between government funding and spending disclosed under the categories examined. asserted
Attorney → calculate → categories
LAFLA has pushed back against those conclusions. asserted
LAFLA → push → conclusions
Barbara Schultz, the nonprofit’s director of housing justice, previously called the City Attorney’s claims “inaccurate and misleading,” maintaining that the organization answered numerous requests for information and submitted monthly reports to the city’s Housing Department. She also said that attorney-client confidentiality prevents LAFLA from releasing certain information about the tenants it represents. uncertain
it → call → tenants
Housing Department officials have also defended the nonprofit, saying that it satisfied their requests for financial information. asserted
it → defend → information
Despite the ongoing dispute, LAFLA’s new $106.6 million city contract has been signed, allowing funding to move forward. Feldstein Soto maintains that additional documentation is still needed to reconcile the public funding with the nonprofit’s reported spending. asserted
documentation → sign → spending
Her report calls for a full audit but does not identify who will conduct it or when it will begin. asserted
it → call → it
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support