Police Department May Decline to Release Names of Officers Trained by ICE

Reason · collected 2026-09-14 · by Eugene Volokh
Read the original at Reason ↗

Summary

A Pennsylvania police department has affirmed its decision to withhold officers' names from training certificates related to ICE cooperation, citing potential risks to officer safety under the state’s Right-to-Know Law. Chief Wargo attests that releasing this information could lead to substantial and demonstrable harm due to current hostility towards immigration enforcement. The article details how public disclosure of such details might expose officers to threats similar to those faced by an ICE attorney whose personal information was maliciously published, leading to federal charges against the perpetrators.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
16%
4 of 25 hedged
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
91.4
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

In August 2023, the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records affirmed a decision by a police department to redact officers' names from training certificates related to its ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) partnership. The case, In the Matter of Darney v. Carroll Township Police Dep't, involved a request under Pennsylvania's Right-to-Know Law for details about the department’s 287(g) agreement with ICE. The police department argued that releasing officer names could result in threats, harassment, and interference with their personal lives, which are exempted under Section 708(b)(1)(ii) of the RTKL if they pose a substantial risk to individual security. To support this claim, the department provided credible evidence showing past instances where officers faced doxxing and physical harm due to their involvement in enforcing federal immigration laws.

Written for “ICE Training Controversy” on 2026-09-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.35 for article 8971 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-14

Story

📰 ICE Training Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Reason · 116 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
46 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Keene alleged that, from May 24 to June 27, 2025, at least four Google "AI Overviews" said false things about him: - Keene was "serving a life sentence without parole for multiple convictions." - He was "serving a life sentence without parole for the murders of three women." - He "was convicted of drug trafficking."
2026-09-14 · mixed framing · Federal Court Allows Libel-by-AI Claim (Brought by Protagonist of Apple TV's Black Bird Series) to Go Forward
🔮 affirming a police department's "redact[ing] officers' names from certain training certificates" released in response to a Right-to-Know Law request for a police department's "287(g) agreement" with ICE: Section 708(b)(1)(ii) of the RTKL exempts from disclosure a record that "would be reasonably likely to result in a substantial and demonstrable risk of physical harm to or the personal security of an individual."
2026-09-14 · assertive framing · Police Department May Decline to Release Names of Officers Trained by ICE
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent An excerpt from the long opinion today in Lewis-Williams v. S.F. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., decided by Judge Ryan Nelson, joined by Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Bridget Bade: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District seeks to overturn a jury verdict of $7,824,580 to six former employees for Title VII violations for failure to accommodate their sincere religious objections to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
2026-09-12 · assertive framing · Court Upholds $7.85M Verdict for Employees Fired for Refusing to Get COVID-19 Vaccine
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent I much enjoyed participating in this, and I expect many of our readers will much enjoy listening to it.
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · Geof Stone and I on "The State of Free Speech in 2026" (from the National Constitution Center)
🔮 [Nor do they] offer … facts that would suggest inevitable or likely exposure to the curriculum (or its harmful effects)….
2026-09-08 · mixed framing · "Jewish, Zionist" Teachers' and Parents' Lawsuit Over Allegedly Anti-Capitalist and Anti-Zionist School Curriculum Can Be Refiled, Ninth Circuit Rules
🔮 The court concluded that "The Big Board's refusal to comply with the orders was not expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment," so not renewing his license based solely on such refusal would have been constitutional:
2026-09-08 · assertive framing · Was D.C. Bar's Liquor License Denied Partly Based on Owner's Speech Criticizing Anti-Masking/Vax-Proof Requirement Speech?
🔮 Lambert … falsely stated that the Plaintiffs had conflicts of interest with her clients and/or her firm, that she would sue the Plaintiffs if they were to be engaged in these relationships, and implicitly that she would take legal action against the relationships themselves if they were to hire Plaintiffs.
2026-09-08 · mixed framing · Forensic Election Fraud Analysts Allege Defendants Defamed Them as "Retaliation for Plaintiffs' Refusal to Report False Findings of Election Fraud"
🔮 The court concluded that, even "assuming arguendo that there's a fair chance that the press defendants have violated the federal and state trade secrets provisions," the First Amendment would preclude the TRO:
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Judge's Opinion Denying TRO Against Arkansas Democrat-Gazette as to Publishing of Data Center Plans
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From the docket this morning; for more on the case, see here and here (the latter item notes the sealing, and expresses the now-realized hope that "the motion will be unsealed at some point soon"): Via email, Plaintiff has informed the Court that it will not be pursuing preliminary injunctive relief….
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Brief Update on the Entergy / Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Matter
🔮 Perhaps most analogously to alienation of affections, if Alan breaches his contract with Betty, and Cathy encouraged him to breach it, she will in many situations be liable for intentional interference with contract.
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Alienation of Affections as Complicity
More on this subject from Eugene Volokh
Oklahoma Judge's Ruling Contained AI Hallucinations
2026-09-14 · Reason · 54% similar
Brief Update on the Entergy / Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Matter
2026-09-06 · Reason · 53% similar
Prosecution for Forging Court Order, Purportedly from Chief Justice Roberts
2026-08-28 · Reason · 51% similar
All 46 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Agency Department ICE Right-to-Know Law the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records

Subjects

ICE ORG · 5× Department ORG · 3× Agency ORG · 2× DHS ORG · 1× Los Angeles GPE · 1× The Department of Homeland Security ORG · 1× Thomas] Wargo PERSON · 1× the Department of Justice ORG · 1× the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records ORG · 1× the United States Department of Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

The potential harm includes threats or physical confrontations directed toward the officers, harassment of their family members, interference with their personal lives, and efforts to impair their ability to carry out their official duties…. [T]he Department submitted credible evidence that threats, doxxing, and other forms of harassment have been directed toward law enforcement charged with enforcing existing federal immigration laws.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 affirming a police department's "redact[ing] officers' names from certain training certificates" released in response to a Right-to-Know Law request for a police department's "287(g) agreement" with ICE: Section 708(b)(1)(ii) of the RTKL exempts from disclosure a record that "would be reasonably likely to result in a substantial and demonstrable risk of physical harm to or the personal security of an individual."
2026-09-14 · Reason
Police Department May Decline to Release Names of Officers Trained by ICE · assertive framing

Claims (25 extracted, 4 hedged)

affirming a police department's "redact[ing] officers' names from certain training certificates" released in response to a Right-to-Know Law request for a police department's "287(g) agreement" with ICE: Section 708(b)(1)(ii) of the RTKL exempts from disclosure a record that "would be reasonably likely to result in a substantial and demonstrable risk of physical harm to or the personal security of an individual." asserted
that → affirm → individual
To establish that this exemption applies, an agency must show: (1) a "reasonable likelihood" of (2) "substantial and demonstrable risk" to a person's security. asserted
agency → establish → security
"Reasonably likely" has been interpreted as "requiring more than speculation." asserted
likely → interpret → speculation
Under the RTKL, one method an agency may use in meeting the burden of proof that a record is exempt is a testimonial affidavit, which if "found to be relevant and credible may provide sufficient evidence in support of a claimed exemption." uncertain
which → use → exemption
Such "affidavits must be detailed, nonconclusory, and submitted in good faith." asserted
affidavits → submit → faith
No evidence has been presented to show that the Department acted in bad faith, and therefore the averments in the Department's attestation should be accepted as true. asserted
averments → present → attestation
Here, [Chief of Police Thomas] Wargo Attests that the Department provided nine responsive training certificates. asserted
Department → attest → certificates
Further: 7. The Agency did not redact the fact that officers completed the training, the nature of the certification, the dates of certification, or other information demonstrating that the required training was completed…. asserted
training → redact → certification
Disclosure of the officers' names would do more than identify them as Agency employees or police officers. asserted
Disclosure → do → employees
It would specifically associate each named officer with ICE and immigration-enforcement activities under the 287(g) program. asserted
It → associate → program
Based upon my law-enforcement experience, training, knowledge of current conditions, and familiarity with threats directed toward law-enforcement personnel, publicly identifying the officers who completed 287(g) training would create a heightened risk to those officers and their families. asserted
who → base → officers
Immigration enforcement and cooperation with ICE are presently the subjects of significant public controversy, hostility, and organized opposition…. asserted
enforcement → organize → controversy
For example, in September 2025, the United States Department of Justice announced the arrest of an individual accused of maliciously publishing personal and identifying information concerning an ICE attorney. asserted
Department → announce → attorney
According to the federal criminal complaint described by the Department of Justice, the individual allegedly published the attorney's name, photograph, work location, and other identifying information and encouraged others to confront and harass the attorney. uncertain
individual → accord → attorney
Also in September 2025, federal prosecutors announced charges against individuals accused of publishing personal information concerning an ICE agent following immigration-enforcement activity in Los Angeles. asserted
prosecutors → announce → Angeles
The published information reportedly included information concerning the agent's identity and location and was allegedly disseminated for the purpose of intimidating, harassing, or interfering with the agent in the performance of official duties. uncertain
information → publish → duties
In another federal prosecution, individuals were charged with improperly accessing federal law-enforcement databases and obtaining sensitive personal information regarding law-enforcement personnel and other victims. asserted
individuals → charge → personnel
Federal prosecutors alleged that the defendants threatened to publish victims' personal information and used unlawfully obtained information to harass or extort them. asserted
defendants → allege → them
The Department of Homeland Security has also publicly warned of the danger created when the names, photographs, employment information, addresses, family information, and other identifying details of federal law-enforcement officers are collected and published online. asserted
names → warn → officers
DHS has stated that such disclosures have been accompanied by threats, harassment, intimidation, and efforts to target officers and their families….. asserted
disclosures → state → officers
Law-enforcement personnel publicly associated with immigration enforcement may be subjected to doxxing, swatting, stalking, harassment, threats, damage to property, or confrontations while on duty or off duty. uncertain
personnel → associate → duty
Doxxing involves the public disclosure or dissemination of identifying or personal information concerning an individual, often for the purpose of facilitating harassment, threats, intimidation, or physical targeting. 22. Swatting involves making a false emergency report for the purpose of causing an armed law-enforcement response to an individual's home or another location associated with that individual. 23. asserted
Swatting → involve → individual
The disclosure of the names requested here would make it easier for persons hostile to ICE or the 287(g) program to identify, research, locate, monitor, or target the participating officers and their family members….. 28. asserted
persons → request → officers
The potential harm includes threats or physical confrontations directed toward the officers, harassment of their family members, interference with their personal lives, and efforts to impair their ability to carry out their official duties…. [T]he Department submitted credible evidence that threats, doxxing, and other forms of harassment have been directed toward law enforcement charged with enforcing existing federal immigration laws. asserted
threats → include → laws
While there is a clear public interest in the training certifications of law enforcement, … the Department has met its burden of proving that the officers' names on the 287(g) certification records are exempt from disclosure under the RTKL because it poses a likelihood of a substantial and demonstrable risk to the personal security of those officers…. asserted
it → be → officers
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support
Terms · Privacy · beta v2.0.0
Articles to 14 Sep 2026