After Labor won government in 2022, a shout went up from various left-wing groups.
asserted
shout → win → groups
When, they asked, would Labor come to its senses and realise it needed to break its promise to deliver Scott Morrison’s stage 3 tax cuts?
asserted
it → ask → cuts
After all, they said, think of what that money could be spent on.
uncertain
money → say → what
Free dental care, tackling poverty by boosting JobSeeker, universal childcare, public housing, superannuation on paid parental leave – the list went on.
asserted
list → tackle → leave
Of course, not all of these could be funded by this one change.
uncertain
all → fund → change
Nonetheless, Labor’s failure to change the tax cuts became a proxy for everything it had not yet done.
asserted
it → change → everything
In the second year of their first term, Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers broke the promise and killed Morrison’s plan off.
asserted
Albanese → break → plan
A handful of those spending demands have by now been met, such as superannuation on paid parental leave.
asserted
handful → meet → leave
Most of that wishlist, though, remains unfulfilled.
asserted
Most → remain → wishlist
The first is that spending pressures on government these days are immense, a fact underlined – yet again – by the recent release of the federal government’s Intergenerational Report, with its focus on our ageing population.
asserted
pressures → underline → population
The second is that Labor didn’t just scrap those tax cuts, immensely generous to the rich.
asserted
Labor → scrap → rich
It restructured them.
asserted
It → restructure → them
There were still tax cuts, only they were weighted more towards the other end of the income spectrum.
asserted
they → be → spectrum
That meant the cost was roughly the same – with no money left over for the wishlist.
asserted
cost → mean → wishlist
Naturally, demand for those other plans hasn’t stopped.
asserted
demand → stop → plans
Instead, advocates found a new proxy: if only Labor would do something about negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount it would have all this lovely money.
asserted
it → find → money
Then Labor acted on those too, but with much the same result.
asserted
Labor → act → result
There was no money left over, at least not in the immediate future, because it had been returned to workers and businesses through – you guessed it – tax cuts.
asserted
you → be → cuts
Last week, new Greens leader David Shoebridge explained he would not support the government’s proposed savings on private health insurance rebates for older people:
asserted
he → explain → people
“It is plain offensive to see Labor looking for over a billion dollars in savings from cutting rebates to pensioners when they refuse to even consider taxing record gas export profits.
asserted
they → see → profits
We have a simple message for Labor today: tax gas multinationals, not pensioners, then you will get Greens support.”
asserted
you → have → support
Given the history of these things, as well as reports Labor was considering it before the fuel crisis made it politically unfeasible, you would expect this, too, will become law one day, though probably not soon.
asserted
this → give → it
But whenever it does happen, it is unlikely the left’s wishlist will suddenly be granted.
asserted
wishlist → happen → ?
In part, that will be because Labor will have to pay for its next round of income tax cuts – which have been hinted at ever since the budget.
asserted
which → have → budget
In that budget, Labor announced a new type of tax cut, a Working Australians Tax Offset, designed specifically for workers rather than those who earn income from assets.
asserted
who → announce → assets
Just after the budget, Chalmers said, “I would intend to make the most of that at some future point.”
asserted
I → say → point
Two weeks later, journalist Phillip Coorey asked if he should have been more open about specific tax cuts at the next election: “Chalmers acknowledged there would be scope to announce an increase” to the offset.
asserted
Chalmers → ask → offset
He has continued to speak of creating room in the budget for future tax cuts, including to journalist Samantha Maiden last week.
asserted
He → continue → Maiden
Those future tax cuts are an interesting – and largely missing – aspect of this year’s budget debate.
asserted
cuts → miss → debate
While there has been broad support for the government’s changes to housing taxes (if not the overall package), there has sometimes been an impression given in commentary that a chance at wider structural reform was missed.
asserted
chance → give → reform
This was always a little unfair: there is no reason ending tax breaks that destructively distort the economy, as this country’s housing tax breaks have for over two decades, should not count as significant reform.
asserted
breaks → be → reform
But it also skipped over the likelihood of the government reducing income tax before the next election, which would allow us to see the budget changes within a different context.
asserted
us → skip → context
That skipping was entirely reasonable: none of us can simply assume the government will do something it has not explicitly promised.
asserted
it → skip → something
Which raises the question Coorey pointed to, of whether the government should have announced such tax cuts around the budget.
asserted
government → raise → budget
The first is that they would have been inflationary, destroying any chance Labor had of convincing voters it was not to blame for ongoing price problems.
asserted
it → destroy → problems
The second is that, politically, Labor would benefit more from their impact closer to the election.
asserted
Labor → benefit → election
In a speech last week, Chalmers pointed out just how much had changed since last year, when house prices were “surging” and interest rates had been cut.
asserted
rates → point → year
And he looked a year ahead, with expected changes equally dramatic: inflation moderating, rates coming down again and real incomes rising.
asserted
incomes → look → changes
With Labor MPs obviously nervous right now – and increasingly speaking to the media about their concerns – there is good reason for Chalmers to remind his colleagues that things may feel very different in a year.
uncertain
things → speak → year
It is not only that the political atmospherics might have changed.
uncertain
atmospherics → change → ?
…and 8 more, not listed.
The Aporia
